Cases

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1334 CHRISTOPHER LIGHTFOOT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GEORGIA-PACIFIC WOOD PRODUCTS, LLC; GEORGIA-PACIFIC LLC, individually and as successor-in-interest to Georgia-Pacific Corporation; WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY, Defendants - Appellees,

671 F.Supp.2d 785 (2009) Earl Clyde KELLY, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. GEORGIA-PACIFIC LLC, and Georgia Pacific Wood Products LLC, Defendants. No. 7:08-CV-197-D. United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Southern Division. September 30, 2009. *787 Daniel K. Bryson, Scott C. Harri

OPINION THACKER, Circuit Judge: Bianca Ellis, Mark Sroka, and Jaqueline Sroka (collectively, the “Appellants”) appeal the district court’s order dismissing their putative class action complaint. They claim that Louisiana-Pacific Corp. (“LP” or the “Appellee”) negligently designed and manufactured Trimboard, a composite building product designed and marke

411 B.R. 889 (2009) In the Matter of SCANWARE, INC., Debtor. Rayonier Wood Products, L.L.C., Plaintiff v. Scanware, Inc. and Finscan, Oy, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 08-35848-rld. Adversary No. 08-6030. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia, Statesboro Division. February 25, 2009. *891 James B. Durham, Durham, McHugh &a;

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeals of -- ) ) Dick Pacific Construction Co., Ltd. ) ASBCA Nos. 57675, 57806, 58149 ) 58150,58151,58174 ) Under Contract No. W9128A-07-C-0004 ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: John W. Ralls, Esq.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ LEXMARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant v. IMPRESSION PRODUCTS, INC., Defendant-Appellant QUALITY CARTRIDGES, INC., JOHN DOES, 1-20, BLUE TRADING LLC, EXPRINT INTERNATIONAL, INC., LD PRODUCTS, INC., PRINTRONIC CORPORATION, TESEN DEVELOPMENT (HONG KONG) CO. LTD., BENIGNO ADEVA AND HIS

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ LEXMARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant v. IMPRESSION PRODUCTS, INC., Defendant-Appellant QUALITY CARTRIDGES, INC., JOHN DOES, 1-20, BLUE TRADING LLC, EXPRINT INTERNATIONAL, INC., LD PRODUCTS, INC., PRINTRONIC CORPORATION, TESEN DEVELOPMENT (HONG KONG) CO. LTD., BENIGNO ADEVA AND HIS

DECISION AND ORDER ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Bristol Village, Inc. (“Bristol” or “Plaintiff’) brought this action against defendant Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (“LPC”), concerning a dispute that a product called “TrimBoard” did not function properly on Plaintiffs property. LPC previously manufactured TrimBoard, which is a hardboard prod

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT In re: Google Play Store Antitrust No. 24-6256 Litigation D.C. Nos. ______________________________ 3:21-md-02981-JD _ 3:20-cv-05671-JD EPIC GAMES, INC., a Maryland Corporation, OPINION Plaintiff - Appellee, v. GOOGLE LLC; GOOGL

APPOINTMENT OF PRETRIAL JUDGE IN THE FOLLOWING MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION CASE: Pursuant to Administrative Rule 13, the cases listed on Appendix A, attached hereto and incorporated herein for all purposes, and tag-along cases if any, are transferred to Judge Tracy Christopher of the 295th District Court of Harris County. Justice CASTILLO not sitting. APPENDIX A Amended Appendix A, Part I and

OPINION AND ORDER SEIBEL, District Judge. Before the Court is the appeal of Grocery Haulers, Inc. (“GHI” or “Appellant”) from the Bankruptcy Court’s Order (“Final Order”)1 denying GHI’s motion seeking a ruling that the automatic stay does not bar litigation that GHI sought to bring in New Jersey district court against the Debtors or, in the alternative, that good cause existed to

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO. 99 This Order relates to the cases listed in Appendix 1 Richard Mark Gergel, United States District Court Judge Before the Court is Defendant’s Omnibus Motion for Summary Judgment, (Dkt. No. 1564).1 For the reasons stated below, the motion is GRANTED IN PART.2 I, Background

398 F.Supp.2d 563 (2005) In re SILICA PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. No. MDL 1553. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Corpus Christi Division. June 30, 2005. *564 *565 *566 John R. Fabry, Liaison Counsel, for all plaintiffs. Darrell Lee Barger, Liaiso

*455CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO. 100 This Order relates to the cases listed in Appendix 1 Richard Mark Gergel, United States District Court Judge Before the Court is Defendant’s Omnibus Motion for Summary Judgment, (Dkt. *456No. 1564).1 For the r

[Regarding Application of the Court's Prior Rulings on Manifestation, Incidental Damages (Lost Time), and Unjust Enrichment to All Remaining Jurisdictions in Dispute (MDL Order No. 131 Issues) ] JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION... 274 LEGAL STANDARDS... 275 DISCUSSION... 275 A. Manifestation... 276

Notice: This opinion is subject to correction before publication in the PACIFIC REPORTER. Readers are requested to bring errors to the attention of the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, 303 K Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99501, phone (907) 264-0608, fax (907) 264-0878, email corrections@appellate.courts.state.ak.us. THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA ALASKA TRUSTEE, LLC and ) STEPHEN ROUTH, )

WESLEY, Circuit Judge. Congress has delegated exclusive authority over broadcasting licensure matters to the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC” or “Commission”). That authority includes wide discretion in granting, revoking, conditioning, and extending licenses in furtherance of the public interest. This case arises in part because of the FCC’s inordinate delay in exercising t

SECOND AMENDED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MARCIA A. CRONE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Pending before the court are Defendant Firestone Polymers, LLC’s (“Firestone”) Motions for Summary Judgment (# s 59-66). Having considered the motions, the submissions of the parties, the pleadings, and the applicable law, the court finds that Firestone’s motions should be granted in part and denied in part.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER1 JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ Renewed Motion for Class Certification, filed January 13, 2014 (Doe. 116). The Court held a multi-part class certification heating, which took place on: (i) May 8 and 9, 2014; (ii) March 13 and 14, 2014; (iii) June 30, 2014; and (iv) July 14, 2014

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER KEITH STARRETT, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Motion for Summary Judgment [46] of the Defendants Vicksburg Healthcare, LLC d/b/a River Region Medical Center (“RRMC”) and Darlene White. Having considered the parties’ submissions, the record, and the applicable law, the Court finds that the motion should be granted. J.