Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA J.Q.R., by his parent and next friend NATIA ROGERS Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-02477 (CJN) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GOVERNMENT, et al., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION J.Q.R., a minor, alleges that he was falsely arrested while attending school at De

Reversed and remanded with instructions by published opinion. Judge WILLIAMS wrote the opinion, in which Judge LUTTIG and Judge GREGORY joined. OPINION WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge: The Maryland Stadium Authority (Stadium Authority) and the University System of Maryland (the University) filed a lawsuit against Ellerbe Becket, Inc., an architectural and engineering firm, in Maryland state co

407 F.3d 255 MARYLAND STADIUM AUTHORITY; University System Of Maryland, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.ELLERBE BECKET INCORPORATED, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant-Appellee.Maryland Stadium Authority; University System Of Maryland, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.Ellerbe Becket Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant-Appellee. No. 04-1743. No. 04-2083. Unite

OPINION AND ORDER FUTEY, Judge. The Court issued a final judgment and injunction in this matter on July 8, 2010. On August 4, 2010, intervenor B.L. Harbert-Brasfield & Gorrie, JV (“Harbert-Gorrie”) filed an appeal with the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and then, in this Court, a motion for stay of the injunction pending that appeal. Harbert-Gorrie argues that this C

645 F.3d 1377 (2011) TURNER CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and McCarthy/Hunt, JV, Defendant, and B.L. Harbert-Brasfield & Gorrie, JV, Defendant-Appellant. No. 2010-5146. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. July 14, 2011. *1379 Scott M. McCaleb, Wiley Rein, LLP, of

OPINION AND ORDER FUTEY, Judge. This is a post-award bid protest related to a contract for the replacement of Fort Ben-ning’s Martin Army Community Hospital (“the Hospital”). The United States Army *563Corps of Engineers (“the Army”) awarded that contract to Turner Construction Company (“Turner”) on September 28, 2009. Turner’s two rival

686 A.2d 537 (1996) Kevin SMITH, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. Nos. 93-CF-1359, 94-CO-1133, 94-CO-1672. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued October 3, 1995. Decided November 27, 1996. *539 Jody Goodman, appointed by the court, Washington, DC, for appellant. E. Vaughn Dunnigan, Assistant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) NICOLE RENA MCCREA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 16-cv-0808 (TSC) ) DISTRI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________ ) RANDY BROWN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 16-0947-EGS

KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, United States District Judge Plaintiff Gene Ryan ("Ryan") is an employee of the District of Columbia Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department ("FEMS" or "the Department"). Ryan claims that he uncovered "widespread waste, fraud, and negligence within [FEMS]" while acting as the Department's EMS Oversight Officer, and that shortly after he publicly disclosed what he perceived to be the Department's interna

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) GENE RYAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 14-cv-0294 (KBJ)

MEMORANDUM OPINION BERYL A. HOWELL, United States District Judge Plaintiffs are nineteen African-American current and former employees of the District of Columbia Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department (“DCFEMS”), Along with twenty-five of their colleagues, the current plaintiffs sought to initiate a class action • against DCFEMS on behalf of themselves and all African-American firefighters a

OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND RELATED EVIDENTIARY MOTIONS CAMERON McGOWAN CURRIE, District Judge. This matter is before the court on two motions for summary judgment and two related evidentiary motions. For reasons set forth below: (1) the motion to dismiss or for summary judgment filed by Defendants The University of South Carolina (“USC”), USC’s former Athletic Director, Eric Hym

EASTERLY, Associate Judge, dissenting: This is not a public duty doctrine case— at least not as the public duty doctrine has ever been conceived by this court. As its name suggests, the ostensible goal in applying this doctrine, at least at first, was to discern whether the District had an actionable duty of care when its agents were alleged to have acted negligently. But there should be no question that the Dis

HAYNSWORTH, Circuit Judge. In this action by the United States and E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company against the members of the South Carolina Tax Commission, the plaintiffs seek an injunction against the collection of South Carolina sales and use taxes upon the use of purchased materials at the Savannah River Project, a facility of the United States, producing, under the direc

535 F.3d 300 (2008) SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF DISABILITIES AND SPECIAL NEEDS; South Carolina State Budget And Control Board And Control Board-Insurance Reserve Fund, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. HOOVER UNIVERSAL, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellant. South Carolina Department of Mental Health; South Carolina State Budget and Control Board and Control Board-Insurance Reserve Fund, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Hoover Universal, Incorporated, De

900 S.W.2d 117 (1995) G.M. WALLS, Jr., Appellant, v. FIRST STATE BANK OF MIAMI, et al., Appellees. No. 07-94-0184-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Amarillo. May 30, 1995. Rehearing Overruled June 26, 1995. *118 Miles O'Loughlin, J.A. Martindale, Pampa, Edwards Terry Baiamonte & Edwards, William R. Edwards, III,

USCA4 Appeal: 22-2075 Doc: 38 Filed: 06/11/2024 Pg: 1 of 17 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-2075 ANGELA SINGLETON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MARYLAND TECHNOLOGY AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,

RANDOLPH D. MOSS, United States District Judge This case presents a single issue: Whether Defendant National Railroad Passenger Corporation ("Amtrak") is subject to the False Claims Act ("FCA"), 31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq. Plaintiff Kathleen Harasek, a former Amtrak employee, alleges that her supervisor retal

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA KATHLEEN A. HARASEK, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 17-2017 (RDM) NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION d/b/a/ AMTRAK, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION This case presents a single issue: Whether Defendant National Railroad Passenger C