Cases

Appellate Case: 23-1192 Document: 010111086158 Date Filed: 07/29/2024 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS July 29, 2024

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE GRANTING “MOTION TO LIFT AUTOMATIC STAY TO PERMIT ARBITRATION OF CLAIMS” COMBINED WITH RELATED OR-DERS AND NOTICE OF THE EN-TRY THEREOF David S. Kennedy, UNITED STATES CHIEF BANKRUPTCY JUDGE INTRODUCTION This core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B) and (G) arises out of a “Mo*866tion To Lift Automa

411 B.R. 386 (2009) In re Jesus Armando PEREZ, Debtor. Charles F. McVay, United States Trustee Region 19, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. Jesus Armando Perez, Defendant, Appellant. Civil Action No. 07-cv-02301-MSK. United States District Court, D. Colorado. May 20, 2009. *389 Alison Elizabeth Goldenberg, James Snyder, U.S. Department

997 F.Supp. 172 (1998) John L. WHITEHOUSE v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. No. CIV.A. 97-10317-RGS. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. March 9, 1998. *173 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT STEARNS, District Judge. John L. Whitehouse is an attorney who represe

13 F.Supp.2d 705 (1998) McDONALD'S CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. C.B. MANAGEMENT CO., INC., an Ohio corporation doing business in Ohio, Defendant. No. 97 C 6176. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. April 1, 1998. *706 Eric A. Oesterle, Alan H. Silberman, Sonnenschein, Nath & Ros

Gershengorn, J. The plaintiff, Joseph Lorenc (“Lorenc”) brought this action in Middlesex Superior Court against his former employer, the defendant Be Free, Inc. (“Be Free”), and two of Be Free’s executives, the defendants Gordon Hoffstein (“Hoffstein”) and Stephen Joseph (“Joseph”). The Counts contained in Lorenc’s Verified Complaint are as follows: Count I: Breach of Stock Option Contract

374 B.R. 800 (2007) In re Jesus Armando PEREZ, Debtor. Charles F. McVay, United States Trustee Region 19, Plaintiff, v. Jesus Armando Perez, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 05-31631-SBB, Adversary No. 06-01202-SBB. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado. September 7, 2007. *801 *802 Alison

ACCEPTED 04-14-00829-cv 04-14-00829-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXA

477 F.Supp. 1093 (1979) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. TRACINDA INVESTMENT CORPORATION and Kirk Kerkorian, Defendants. No. CV 79-0174-AAH (SX). United States District Court, C. D. California. September 14, 1979. *1094 *1095 *1096 Alan L. Marx, Denn

ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

OPINION OP THE COURT. BRATTON, J. F. J. Beck was elected alderman from the Fifth ward of the city of Roswell at the regular election held during April, 1920, and J. C. Gilbert was elected alderman from said ward at the regular election held during April, 1922. Thereafter Beck moved out of said municipality and ceased to be a resident thereof, and' Gilbert moved

ACCEPTED 01-15-00867-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS

Bocees, J. The learned judge, who decided this case at Special Term, shows very clearly in his opinion, written on that occasion, that the action was well brought by the plaintiff.* Her husband never *249had possession of the premises in right of his wife, nor did he evre acquire the right of possession as tenant by the curtesy, for the re

ACCEPTED 01-15-00867-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 11/24/2015 10:18:56 AM

258 F.Supp.2d 576 (2003) In Re ENRON CORPORATION SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE & "ERISA LITIGATION" This Document Relates to: All Cases Mark Newby, et al., Plaintiffs v. Enron Corporation, et al., Defendants The Regents of The University of California, et al., Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. Kenneth L. Lay, et al., Defendants. No. MD-1446, CIV.A.H-01-3624.

Mr. Justice HUNT delivered the opinion of the court. The claim of Federal jurisdiction over this action.is based upon article 4, section 1, of the Constitution of the United States. It is there declared that “ full faith and credit shall be given in each State to the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of every other State; and the Congress may, by gene

235 F.Supp.2d 549 (2002) In re ENRON CORPORATION SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE & ERISA LITIGATION. This Document Relates to All Cases. Mark Newby, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Enron Corporation, et al., Defendants. The Regents of the University of California, et al., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. Kenneth L. Lay, et al., Defendants. MDL No. 1446 Civil Action No. H-01-36