Cases

OPINION OF THE COURT SCIRICA, Circuit Judge. Nearly fifty years ago, this court adopted what has become known as the “first-filed” rule. We concluded that “[i]n all cases of federal concurrent jurisdiction, the court which first has possession of the subject must decide it.” Crosley Corp. v. Hazeltine Corp., 122 F.2d 925, 929 (3d C

MEMORANDUM DALZELL, District Judge. Teresa De Luca (“De Luca”) brings this suit against her former employer, the Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania (“Penn” or “the University”), alleging violations of the Family and Medical Leave Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 2601 et seq. (“FMLA”). De Luca specifically alleges that Penn interfered with her rights under the FMLA and retaliated against her for

Karen LeCraft Henderson, Circuit Judge: Law professor Kemit Mawakana was denied tenure and terminated by his employer, the University of the District of Columbia. He sued the University's Board of Trustees, claiming the University discriminated against him based on race and violated both the terms and spirit of its contract with him. The district court granted the University's motion fo

MEMORANDUM OPINION BERYL A. HOWELL, United States District Judge The plaintiff, Nancy Shinabargar, proceeding pro se, brings this lawsuit against the Board of Trustees of the University of the District of Columbia (“UDC”), where the plaintiff formerly attended law school, and ten UDC employees, including the Dean and Associate Dean of the Law School, five professors, the Director of Public Safety, w

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D2024-1429 _____________________________ ATLANTIC COAST CONFERENCE, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY BOARD OF TRUSTEES, Respondent. _____________________________ Petition for Writ of Certiorari—Original Jurisdiction. November 4, 2024 LEWIS, J. Pe

OPINION OF THE COURT SMITH, Circuit Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This case results from efforts by the University of Pennsylvania (“Penn”) to hire a coach for its women’s crew program. Appellee Andrew Medcalf, a male, applied for the position of Women’s Crew Coach. Penn interviewed several females for the position, but did not interview Medcalf or any other males; Barbara Kirch, a female, wa

ORDER AND OPINION GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT DONALD M. MIDDLEBROOKS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Defendant Florida Atlantic University Board of Trustees’ (“FAU”) Motion for Summary Judgment (“Motion”), filed June 23, 2016. (DE 113). Plaintiff Holly Hargett (“Hargett”) filed a Response on July 28, 2016 (DE 134), to which FAU replied on August 2

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT THOMAS L. LUDINGTON, United States District Judge Plaintiff Sara J. Kubik brought suit against the Central Michigan University Board of Trustees (“CMU”) and several members of the faculty and university administration on June 5, 2015. ECF No. 1. Plaintiff contends that CMU refused to reappoint her as a tenure-track professor in the Journal

RIPPLE, Circuit Judge. Patrick Novak brought this action against Southern Illinois University (“the University”) and three of its professors, alleging that he had been terminated from the University’s doctoral program in Curriculum and Instruction on the basis of his post-traumatic stress disorder, in violation of section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act and Title II of the America

ORDER ELIZABETH A. KOVACHEVICH, District Judge. This cause is before the Court on: *1310Dkts. 24-26 Defendants motion for summary judgment Dkt. 27 Plaintiffs response in opposition Dkt. 30 Defendant’s reply Plaintiff Michel

Case: 22-10145 Document: 00516793373 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/20/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED June

855 F.Supp. 750 (1994) Janet M. SMITHGALL v. TRUSTEES OF the UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA and Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania. Civ. A. No. 92-4502. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. May 26, 1994. *751 Glennis L. Clark, Allentown, PA, Geoffrey R. Johnson, Sprague, Higgins, Creamer & Sprague, Philadelphi

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT STATE OF ALASKA, Office of the  Governor, Petitioner, No. 07-70174 v. Agency Nos. EEOC; UNITED STATES OF  11A40004 & AMERICA, 11A40005 Respondents, OPINION MARGARET G. WARD, Intervenor.

452 F.Supp.2d 504 (2006) Michael Anthony CREWS, Plaintiff, v. THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendant. No. 03 Civ. 8096(RWS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 29, 2006. *505 *506 *507 Vincent I. Eke-Nweke

315 F.3d 1005 Howard LOCKRIDGE, Appellee,v.BOARD OF TRUSTEES, OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS, a Public Body Corporate; Dr. B. Allan Sugg, in his official capacity as President of the University of Arkansas; Dr. Steven Jones, Chancellor, Phillips Community College of the University of Arkansas, Appellants.State of Missouri; State of South Dakota, Amici on Behalf of Appellants. No. 01-1472.

MEMORANDUM Matthew W. Brann, United States District Judge Today, litigation over ten years in the making comes to a close. On June 2, 2006, Joan Y. Summy-Long, Ph.D., sued The Pennsylvania State University and various other players for allegedly discriminating against her on the basis of sex and then retaliating against her when she attempted to redress her concerns. Her federal com

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-2806 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VILLAGE AT HAMILTON POINTE LLC, d/b/a Hamilton Pointe Health and Rehabilitation Center; d/b/a Hamilton Pointe Assisted Living Center; d/b/a The Cottages at Hamilton Pointe and TENDER LOV

139 F.Supp.2d 198 (2001) Dr. Roberto VIZCARRONDO v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO, et al. No. CIV. 99-1225(DRD). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. March 21, 2001. *199 *200 Jorge A. Antongiorgi, Henry O. Freese-Souffront, Ruben T. Nigaglioni, McConnell Valdes,

DALE HARTLEY * NO. 2022-CA-0840 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL UNIVERSITY OF HOLY * CROSS FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* APPEAL FROM CIV

DALE HARTLEY * NO. 2022-CA-0840 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL UNIVERSITY OF HOLY * CROSS FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* APPEAL FROM CIV