Cases

MEMORANDUM BUCKWALTER, SENIOR JUDGE Currently pending before the Court is Defendant Local 32BJ, Service Employees International Union’s (“Union’”s) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint. For the following reasons, the Motions is denied. I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND According to the allegations in the Amended Complaint Complaint, Plaintiff Vincent Danao “is Of the

MEMORANDUM OPINION STARK, U.S. District Judge: I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Thornton Carroll (“Plaintiff’) filed this action on October 28, 2011, alleging employment discrimination, violations of his civil rights, and defamation. (D.I.2) The Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331. In addition, Plaintiff asserts jurisdiction by reason of diversity of the par

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF EEOC’S RESPONSES TO DEFENDANT ABM JANITORIAL SERVICES NORTHERN CALIFORNIA’S FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS GARY S. AUSTIN, United States Magistrate Judge. On July 27, 2009, Defendants ABM Industries, Inc., ABM Janitorial Services, Inc., and ABM Janitorial Northern California (“ABM”) filed the instant motion. Defendant’s seek an order to compel P

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE THERESA A. GOLDNER, United States Magistrate Judge. Background On September 28, 2007, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) commenced this civil action *590against defendants ABM Industries, Incorporated and ABM Janitorial Services, Inc. (Doc. 1). The complai

GRUENDER, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. Because I would affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment to ABMK in all respects, I concur in part and dissent in part. I concur in Parts I and II.A of the Court’s opinion. I also agree with the Court’s determination in Part II.B that under the four-factor test set out in Baker v. Stuart Broadc

765 F.Supp.2d 1138 (2010) Francisca SANDOVAL, Ines Hernandez, Miriam Pacheco, Eva Reyes, Arminda Gomez, Nidia Guerrero, Lucila Marquez, Maria Perez, Azucena Garcia, Estela Laureano, and Marlene Giron, Plaintiffs, v. AMERICAN BUILDING MAINTENANCE INDUSTRIES, Inc., also known as ABM Industries, Incorporated d/b/a ABM Janitorial Services, and American Building Maintenance Co. of Kentucky, Defendants. Civil No. 06-1772 (JRT/JSM)

652 F.Supp.2d 791 (2009) REALTIME DATA, LLC d/b/a IXO, Plaintiff, v. PACKETEER, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 6:08cv144. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Tyler Division. August 24, 2009. *792 Patricia A. Martone, Anthony A. Pastor, Ching-Lee Fukuda, Edgar D. Kwee, Jennifer N. Scarpati, Jordan S. Adler, Karim

ORDER JANIE S. MAYERON, United States Magistrate Judge. The above matter came on before the undersigned upon plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel and for Sanctions [Docket No. 84] and defendants’ Motion to Compel [Docket No. 102], Justin Cummins, Esq. appeared on behalf of plaintiffs; Jacqueline Mrachek, Esq. and Nancy Brasel, Esq. appeared on behalf of defendants. The Court, upon all o

552 F.Supp.2d 867 (2008) Francisca SANDOVAL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. AMERICAN BUILDING MAINTNANCE INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil No. 06-1772 (RHK/JSM). United States District Court, D. Minnesota. May 6, 2008. *870 Brendan D Cummins, Justin D Cummins, Kelly A Jeanetta, M William O'Brien, Miller O'Brien Cummins, PLLP, M

OPINION and ORDER ROBERT L. MILLER, JR., District Judge. Trinity Health seeks reconsideration of Magistrate Judge Christopher A. Nuechterlein’s December 16, 2014 order granting the EEOC’s request to enforce an administrative subpoena. Trinity Health objects to having to comply with Subpoena No. IN-14-34S based on its arguments that (a) the information sought by the EEOC is irrelevant to the Com

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 13-3302 YAROSLAV S. SKLYARSKY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MEANS-KNAUS PARTNERS, L.P., Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

ROVNER, Circuit Judge. For thirteen years Yaroslav SMyarsky worked as a custodian at a Chicago office building. His employer changed several times during that period, and in April 2010 he began working for Harvard Maintenance when that company was awarded the building’s contract for janitorial services. Almost immediately Harvard supervisors began disciplining Sklyarsky. He comp

James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *1146THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss State Law Claims, filed March 17, 2017 (Doc. 14)("Motion"). The Court held hearings on June 12, 2017 and January 19, 2018. The primary issues are: (i) whether the federal enclave doctrine applies to st

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 08-2271 ___________ Francisca Sandoval; Ines Hernandez; * Miriam Pacheco; Eva Reyes; Arminda * Gomez; Nidia Guerrero; Lucila * Marquez; Maria Perez; Azucena * Garcia; Estela Laureano; Marlene * Giron, *

107 F.Supp.2d 251 (2000) Emilio PACE, Plaintiff, v. PARIS MAINTENANCE COMPANY, Pembrook Management Company, Corporate Property Investors, and Joseph Galea, Defendants. No. 98 Civ. 1470 RWS. United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 12, 2000. *252 *253 Thomas S. Rosenthal, New York City