Cases

650 F.3d 350 (2011) Luisa PEREZ; Elvin Francisco Gonza Osovio, Individually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. MOUNTAIRE FARMS, INCORPORATED, a Delaware Corporation; Mountaire Farms of Delaware, Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation, Defendants-Appellants, and Ray Barrientos; Maria Gomez; Juana Miguel; Gibran Moya Rivera; Gloria Paneto Castro; Shitwa Perez Lopez; Jose Antonio Santiag Lugo; Maritza Alcover

Case: 19-10197 Date Filed: 07/14/2020 Page: 1 of 23 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 19-10197 ________________________ Agency No. A043-024-298 C

Case: 19-10197 Date Filed: 08/26/2020 Page: 1 of 23 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 19-10197 ________________________ Agency No. A043-024-298 C

PREGERSON, Circuit Judge, dissenting: I dissent. This is but one of a multitude of similar sad cases by which our government’s deportation of undocumented parents results in the deportation of their American-born citizen children, and effectively denies those children their birthrights. See Cerrillo-Perez v. INS, 809 F.2d 1419, 1426-27 (9th Cir.1987) (Requiring the government to conduct individualized a

PREGERSON, Circuit Judge, dissenting: I dissent. This is but one of a multitude of similar sad cases by which our government’s deportation of undocumented parents results in the deportation of their American-born citizen children, and effectively denies those children their birthrights. See Cerrillo-Perez v. INS, 809 F.2d 1419, 1426-27 (9th Cir.1987) (Requiring the government to conduct individualized a

OPINION Opinion by Justice Benavides By eight issues, appellant Rodrigo Martinez, Jr. appeals his conviction for theft of property in an aggregate amount of $200,000 or more, a first-degree felony. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. §§ 31.03, 31.09 (Act of 2011, 82nd Leg., ch, 1234 (amended 2015)) (current version at Tex Penal Code Ann. § 31.03(e)(7) (West, Westlaw through 2015 R.S.)).

ORDER ON PLAN H358 XAVIER RODRIGUEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This Order addresses Plaintiffs’ statutory and constitutional claims against Plan H358, enacted by the 83rd Texas Legislature in 2013. The following Plaintiffs assert claims against Plan H358: The Texas Latino Redistricting Task Force1 (limited to HD90), MALC,2 th

Filed 5/9/18 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, E060438 v. (Super.Ct.No. FVI901482) JOSE LUIS PEREZ et al.,

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 15-30309 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 3:98-cr-00572- MO-8 JOSE LUIS HERNANDEZ-MARTINEZ, AKA Efigenio Aispuro-Aispuro, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 15-30310

Filed 4/12/18 Opinion on remand from Supreme Court CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, E060438 v. (Super.Ct.No. FVI901482) JOSE LUIS PEREZ et al.,

Filed 11/3/17 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, E060438 v. (Super.Ct.No. FVI901482) JOSE LUIS PEREZ et al.,

Filed 10/25/17 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, E060438 v. (Super.Ct.No. FVI901482) JOSE LUIS PEREZ et al., OPINION Defendants and Appellants

352 S.W.3d 751 (2011) Jerry PEREZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 04-10-00122-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio. August 24, 2011. *754 Jesus Guillen, Law Office of Jesus Guillen, Laredo, TX, for Appellant. Isidro R. Alaniz, District Attorney-Webb County, Clarissa Canales, Assistant District Attorn

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 13-50014 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:07-cr-01172- DDP-32 JAVIER PEREZ, AKA Ranger, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 15-50241 Plaintiff-Appellee,

BERZON, Circuit Judge: These consolidated appeals were brought by defendants seeking to reduce their sentences for drug-related crimes. They invoke 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), which allows a court to reduce in certain circumstances a previously imposed sentence, and contend that the Supreme Court's recent interpretat

WOLF, District Judge (concurring dubitante). I concur in the judgment in this case, including the decision to order a new trial for the defendant Eduardo Ocampo Hoyos. I also concur generally in the court’s thorough opinion. I write separately, however, to amplify one point relating to the admission of Ocampo Hoyos’ Colombian identification card and to differ respectfully concerning the characterization of

McCONNELL, Circuit Judge. This case requires us to determine whether a prior California conviction for possession of a weapon was a “firearms offense” within the meaning of the Sentencing Guidelines, § U.S.S.G. 2L1.2(b)(l)(A), where the state statute under which the defendant was convicted encompassed a wide variety of weapons, including many that are not firearms, but the pol

NUMBER 13-24-00035-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL 278, EDUARDO RODRIGUEZ, ESTEBAN J. CAVAZOS, JERRY CASTILLO, DAVID L. MAYS JR., AVERY SANTOS, ANDREW SITTERLY JR., MIGUEL F. CARRANCO, MICHAEL DE LA CRUZ, HECTOR CARRILLO, DAVID ROBERTS, RONNIE FLORES, CONNOR HAMILTON, ISRAEL LOPEZ, CHRIS HERNANDEZ, CHRISTIAN SANCHEZ, AND JOSE A. MARTIN

OPINION AND ORDER BESOSA, District Judge. On April 30, 2008, a jury convicted Daniel Perez-Melendez (“Perez-Melendez”) and Angel Rivera-Rios (“Rivera-Rios”) of aiding and abetting each other to possess with intent to distribute five kilograms or more of cocaine in violation of 21 USC § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A) and 18 USC § 2. Subsequently, on May 6, 2008, Perez-Melendez filed a motion for a judgment of acquitta

PER CURIAM: Aaron Camacho Perez appeals the dismissal of his complaint, challenging a determination of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) that he was statutorily ineligible to adjust status under the Cuban Adjustment Act of 1966. We reverse and remand. I. BACKGROUND