Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
6 opinions for “EDITHA FREEMAN”
In re Alice D.public domain
*610Matthew M. Lupoli was appointed guardian of the person and property of Alice D. (hereinafter Alice) and of the property of Keishma S. (hereinafter Keishma). In this capacity, Lupoli sold, at separate public auctions, a parcel of real property situated in Jamaica, Queens, and owned by Keishma and a parcel of real property situated in Woodhaven, Queens, and owned by Alice. In both instances, Lupo
In re Alice D.public domain
*610Matthew M. Lupoli was appointed guardian of the person and property of Alice D. (hereinafter Alice) and of the property of Keishma S. (hereinafter Keishma). In this capacity, Lupoli sold, at separate public auctions, a parcel of real property situated in Jamaica, Queens, and owned by Keishma and a parcel of real property situated in Woodhaven, Queens, and owned by Alice. In both instances, Lupo
People v. Sebbypublic domain
Illinois Official Reports Appellate Court People v. Sebby, 2015 IL App (3d) 130214 Appellate Court THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Caption MONTANA SEBBY, Defendant-Appellant. District & No. Third District Docket No. 3-13-0214 Filed April 27, 2015 Rehearing denied May 20, 2015 Decision Under Appeal from the Circuit Court of
People v. Sebbypublic domain
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to the Illinois Official Reports accuracy and integrity of this
Commonwealth v. Wattspublic domain
179 Pa. Superior Ct. 398 (1955) Commonwealth v. Watts, Appellant. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued March 31, 1955. September 30, 1955. *399 Before RHODES, P.J., ROSS, GUNTHER, WRIGHT, WOODSIDE, and ERVIN, JJ. (HIRT, J., absent). Stephen J. McEwen, with him Francis R. Lord, for appellant. Ernes
Lincoln Rapid Transit Co. v. Rundlepublic domain
Maxwell, Ch. J. This is an action of ejectment brought in the district court of Lancaster county by the defendant in error against the plaintiff in error to recover possession of lots 7, 8, and 9 in block 38, in Dawson’s addition to Lincoln. The answer of the defendant below is in substance a judgment in the United States circuit court. On the trial of the cause the jury returned a verdict in favor of Rundle, and for $100 da