Cases

In re Louisiana State Board of Dentistry; — Defendant; Applying for Writ of Cer-tiorari and/or Review, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. L, No. 99 — 2343; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 99-CA-2706. Denied.

h JONES, Judge. Defendant/appellant, the Louisiana State Board of Dentistry (Board), appeals the decision of the district court finding that the imposition of a civil penalty against the plaintiff, Teri Dyer, in the amount of $5,000 for each offense of unauthorized practice of dentistry was improper. The district court also vacated the Board’s assessment of costs, attorney’s fees and interest against Ms. Dyer. After reviewing

PER CURIAM: _JjWRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Petitioner has not demonstrated that he sought review in the court(s) below before filing in this Court nor shown the “extraordinary circumstances” that would justify bypassing that level of review. La.S.Ct.R. X § 5(b).

In re Dyer, Michael;—Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. G, No. 09-80-79. Rehearing denied. JOHNSON, J., would grant.

77 So.3d 947 (2012) STATE of Louisiana v. Michael DYER. No. 2011-KP-1758. Supreme Court of Louisiana. January 11, 2012. Rehearing denied. JOHNSON, J., would grant.

Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. K, No. 513-048; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2016-K-1208 | iDenied.

PER CURIAM. | j Granted. The ruling of the trial court granting the defendant’s motion for a special jury instruction regarding surveillance videos is reversed and this case is remanded for further proceedings. This matter involves a shooting in front of a seafood market located in a strip mall. Following the shooting, investigating officers sought to review surveillance videos from eight area businesses, in

|T JOHNSON, J., dissents and assigns reasons. The United States Supreme Court’s his-torie decision in Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. -; 130 S.Ct. 2011, 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010) held that “for a juvenile offender who did not commit homicide, the Eighth Amendment forbids the sentence of life without parole.” Graham, 560 U.S. at -, 130 S.Ct. at 2030. Prior to Graham, the United States was t

In re Lester R. Dryer, III;—Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. K, No. 513-048 |,Writ granted. HUGHES, J., additionally concurs and assigns reasons.

In re Lester Dyer; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or -Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. K, No. 513-048; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2013-K-1571. Denied.

In re Lester R. Dyer, III; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedí*650al Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. K, No. 513-048; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2014-K-1337. Denied.

In re Dyer, Austin; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. M, No. 98-4147; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 09-WR-629. Denied.

48 So.3d 289 (2010) STATE of Louisiana v. Austin DYER. No. 2009-KP-2460. Supreme Court of Louisiana. October 29, 2010. Denied.

In re Dyer, Austin; — Defendant; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. M, No. 98^147; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 07-KH-635. Denied.

998 So.2d 92 (2009) STATE of Louisiana v. Austin DYER. No. 2007-KP-2453. Supreme Court of Louisiana. January 16, 2009. Denied.

In re Dyer, Lester R.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial *389Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. K, No. 513-048; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2013-K-0132. Denied.

In re Dyer, Ivory; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. H, No. 05-10-0382; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2011 KW 0869. Granted for the sole purpose of remanding the case to the district court and ordering it to rule on the merits of relator’s pro se motion for bond reduction. See State v. Melon, 95-2209 (La.9/22/95), 660 So.2d 466

933 So.2d 788 (2006) STATE of Louisiana v. James Thomas and Percy DYER. No. 2006-KK-0619. Supreme Court of Louisiana. July 11, 2006. *789 PER CURIAM. The state's application for review is granted, the decision of the court of appeal is reversed, the judgment of the district court denying the motions to quash filed by respo

In re Dyer, Teri; Dyer, Johnny; — Plaintiffs); Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. F, No. 2000-19923; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No(s). 2004-C-0598, 2004-C-0904. Denied.

36 So.3d 242 (2010) STATE ex rel. Kenny A. DYER v. STATE of Louisiana. No. 2009-KH-1764. Supreme Court of Louisiana. May 28, 2010. Denied.