Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Robert M. Dow, Jr., United States District Judge This case is on appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, Case No. 12-31336 (JPC). On July 10, 2015, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order (“Order”) confirming the amended joint Chapter 11 plan of reorganization for Dvorkin Holdings, LLC (“Debtor”), which was proposed

2022 IL App (1st) 201368 FIRST DISTRICT SIXTH DIVISION April 15, 2022 No. 1-20-1368 ALEX DVORKIN, Individually and as a Member of ) Appeal from the Aldi Development, LLC, and ALDI ) Circuit Court of DEV

RIPPLE, Circuit Judge. Daniel Dvorkin was convicted on five counts of using, or causing another person to use, a facility of interstate commerce with the intent to commit a murder for hire, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1958, and on one count of soliciting another to commit a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 373. He timely appealed his convictions on various grounds.

Ortega v 669 Meeker Ave., LLC (2021 NY Slip Op 00570) Ortega v 669 Meeker Ave., LLC 2021 NY Slip Op 00570 Decided on February 3, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Burea

ORDER James R. Sacca, U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge The issue before the Court is what does “interest at the legal rate” mean under Section 726(a)(5) of the Bankruptcy Code for purposes of a distribution on unsecured claims in a Chapter 7 case if the estate has sufficient assets to pay post-petition interest on those claims. Does the phrase mean interest at the federal judgment rate or does it mean the appl

Honorable Thomas M. Durkin, United States District Judge Appellant Generation Capital I, LLC ("Generation Capital")1 has appealed the *23bankruptcy court's order (1) disallowing its claim in its entirety as a discovery sanction, and (2) the subsequent confirmation of debtor John W. Fliss's Chapter 13 Plan. This Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION Andrew B. Altenburg, Jr., United States Bankruptcy Judge I. INTRODUCTION This matter is before the court on the motion of the City of Millville (the “City”) for summary judgment. Through its adversary proceeding complaint, the Debtor, GGI Properties, LLC (“GGI”), seeks to avoid the transfer of a parcel of real estate located in the City, after the City, pursuant to

*191¶38 (dissenting) — I respectfully dissent from Part II of the majority opinion. Despite recognizing that the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), 9 U.S.C. §§ 1-16, “ £signals[s] the broadest permissible exercise of Congress’ Commerce Clause power’ ” (majority at 183) (quoting Citizens Bank v. Alafabco, Inc., 539 U.S. 52, 56, 123 S. Ct. 2037, 156 L. Ed. 2d 46 (2003)), the strong policy of both

Chambers, J. ¶70 (dissenting) — The majority incorrectly frames the issue, answers the wrong question, and ignores *820the nature of the homeowners’ claims. The issue before us is whether a claim for breach of implied warranty, established by Washington statute after consultation with the stakeholders, imposed on Washington state builders, to protect condominium purchasers

159 P.3d 460 (2007) SATOMI OWNERS ASSOCIATION, a Washington nonprofit corporation, Respondent, v. SATOMI, LLC, a Washington limited liability company, Appellant. No. 56265-7-I. Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1. June 11, 2007. *462 Stellman Keehnel, Rogelio Omar Riojas, DLA Piper U.S. LLP, Anthony Todaro, Peterson Young

Bekkerman v Mount Carmel Cemetery Assn. (2018 NY Slip Op 05742) Bekkerman v Mount Carmel Cemetery Assn. 2018 NY Slip Op 05742 Decided on August 15, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State

ROVNER, Circuit Judge. Paldo Sign and Display Company (“Pal-do Sign”) filed suit under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (the “Act”), 47 U.S.C. § 227(b)(1)(C), against Wagener Equities, Inc. and Daniel Wagener, seeking statutory damages after Paldo Sign received an unsolicited facsimile advertisement promoting Wagener Equities’ services. After the district court certified a

2023 IL 128575 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS (Docket No. 128575) ALEC PINKSTON, Appellee, v. THE CITY OF CHICAGO, Appellant. Opinion filed November 30, 2023. JUSTICE HOLDER WHITE delivered the judgment of th

Justice PATTERSON delivered the opinion of the Court. In this case, the Court considers a question of law certified by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit pursuant to Rule 2:12A-1. The Third Circuit’s inquiry is whether, under New Jersey law, a tax sale certificate purchaser holds a tax lien. Construing the plain language of several provisions of the

Case: 23-1428 Document: 51 Page: 1 Filed: 07/07/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ EGENERA, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2023-1428 ______________________ Appeal from the United Sta

Lau, J. ¶1 Richard and Marnie Fox appeal the trial court’s order denying their motion for a writ of mandamus *260 seeking to compel Skagit County to issue a building permit. The Foxes argue the trial court erred when it ruled that the well on their property, despite being exempt from the water permit re

OPINION AND ORDER JED S. RAKOFF, United States District Judge. The present dispute marks the latest phase in the 32-year long litigation between plaintiff Olin Corporation (“Olin”) and its insurer, defendant Insurance Company of North America (“INA”), a litigation that has occupied the substantial attention of four successive federal district judges, two of whom are now deceased (though presumably from other

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 24a0223p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ ROBERT HOLMAN, │ Plaintiff-Appellant,

USCA4 Appeal: 24-4051 Doc: 95 Filed: 01/21/2026 Pg: 1 of 23 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-4037 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. NELSON EVANS, Defendant – Appellant.

USCA4 Appeal: 24-4103 Doc: 92 Filed: 01/21/2026 Pg: 1 of 23 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-4037 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. NELSON EVANS, Defendant – Appellant.