⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Duvall v. Arizona Department of Child Safety”

Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2013-05-17 · Published · cited 2× · 232 Ariz. 221; 303 P.3d 532; 660 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 34; 2013 WL 2152101; 2013 Ariz. App. LEXIS 98
FILED BY CLERK IN THE COURT OF APPEALS MAY 17 2013 STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION TWO COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION TWO ROOSEVELT ARTHUR WILLIAMS, ) 2 CA-SA 2012-0070
Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso) · 2024-12-04 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS THE STATE OF TEXAS, § No. 08-23-00303-CR Appellant, § Appeal from the v. § 229th Judicial District Court REYNALDO ALBERTO
Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso) · 2024-09-27 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS THE STATE OF TEXAS, § No. 08-23-00303-CR Appellant, § Appeal from the v. §
Michigan Court of Appeals · 2023-03-23 · Published · cited 0×
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, FOR PUBLICATION March 23, 2023 Plaintiff-Appellee, 9:
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-04-17 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00197-CV 4929353 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEX
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019-07-16 · Published · cited 84× · 930 F.3d 264
Reversed and remanded by published opinion. Judges Motz and Keenan wrote the majority opinion, in which Chief Judge Gregory, and Judges King, Wynn, Floyd, Thacker, and Harris joined. Judge Keenan wrote a concurring opinion, in which Judges Motz and Thacker joined. Judge Wilkinson wrote a dissenting opinion, in which Judges Niemeyer, Agee, Richardson, Quattlebaum, and Senior Judge Duncan joined. Judge Wilkinson wrote a specially diss
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-11-30 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-15-00409-CV 8019009 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 11/30/2015 4:14:06 PM
District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2016-04-25 · Published · cited 7× · 182 F. Supp. 3d 320; 2016 WL 1650774
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Thomas D. Schroeder, United States District Judge TABLE OF CONTENTS I.FINDINGS OF FACT... 332 A. North Carolina Voting Laws... 332 1. Voter ID... 332 2. Early Voting... 332 3. Out-of-Precinct Provisional Voting... 334
South Dakota Supreme Court · 2011-08-31 · Published · cited 4× · 2011 S.D. 51; 804 N.W.2d 618; 2011 SD 51; 2011 S.D. LEXIS 110; 2011 WL 3849864
#25330, #25333-a-JKM 2011 S.D. 51 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA * * * * MARK DAVIS and BONNIE DAVIS, as individuals and as parents and natural guardians of CHARLIE DAVIS, CARL DAVIS, JOEY DAVIS, and SELENA DAVIS; KAY EBEN, as an individual and as parent and natural guardian of GRACE EBEN and KENDRA EBEN; DAN GRANT and JANE GRANT, as individuals and as parent
Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008-10-28 · Published · cited 111× · 957 A.2d 407; 289 Conn. 135
Opinion PALMER, J. The issue presented by this case is whether the state statutory prohibition against same sex marriage violates the constitution of Connecticut. The plaintiffs, eight same sex couples, commenced this action, claiming that the state statutory prohibition against same sex marriage violates their rights to substantive due process and eq
Supreme Court of Florida · 2017-01-31 · Published · cited 8× · 209 So. 3d 1199; 42 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 79; 2017 Fla. LEXIS 231
Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC15-2180 ____________ JEAN CHARLES, JR., etc., et al., Appellants, vs. SOUTHERN BAPTIST HOSPITAL OF FLORIDA, INC., etc., et al., Appellees. [January 31, 2017] PARIENTE, J.
District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2001-10-02 · Published · cited 6× · 169 F. Supp. 2d 1260; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17110; 2001 WL 1284790
169 F.Supp.2d 1260 (2001) Douglas McCRAY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF DOTHAN, et al., Defendants. No. Civ.A. 99-D-55-S. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Southern Division. October 2, 2001. *1261 *1262 *1263 *1264<
Ohio Supreme Court · 2002-09-04 · Published · cited 160× · 2002 Ohio 4210; 96 Ohio St. 3d 266
[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 96 Ohio St.3d 266.] WALLACE ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. OHIO DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, DIVISION OF STATE FIRE MARSHAL, APPELLEE. [Cite as Wallace v. Ohio Dept. of Commerce, Div. of State Fire Marshal, 2002-Ohio-4210.] Torts—Negligence—State may not raise the “public-duty rule” in an action in the Court of Claims alleging negligent inspection by the Ohio Department of
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993-02-09 · Published · cited 0× · 985 F.2d 549; 1993 WL 27912
NIES, Chief Judge. Edward L. Harris appeals the final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB or the Board), MSPB No. AT0831910870I-1, affirming on February 27, 1992, the determination of the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) that he elected to provide a survivor annuity for his spouse which election is irrevocable under the Civil Service Retirement System Spouse Equity Act. 53 M.S.P.R. 177. We affirm.
Idaho Supreme Court · 1987-07-24 · Published · cited 54× · 743 P.2d 70; 113 Idaho 202; 1987 Ida. LEXIS 340
743 P.2d 70 (1987) 113 Idaho 202 Steven Dean RANSOM and Debra Jean Ransom, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF GARDEN CITY, Defendant-Respondent, and Jim Duane Inama and John Austin Bergan, Defendants. No. 16430. Supreme Court of Idaho. July 24, 1987. *71 Ringert, Clark, Harrington, Reid, Christenson &am;
Richardson v. Relfpublic domain
Supreme Court of Alabama · 2018-05-04 · Published · cited 0× · 265 So. 3d 236
MAIN, Justice. Ed Richardson and Reginald Eggleston, individually and in their official capacities as interim superintendent of the Alabama Department of Education and chief administrative officer of the Alabama State Board of Education, respectively, and Gordon Stone, individually and in his official capacity as mayor of the Town of Pike Road (hereinafter collectively referred to as "the defendants"), appeal from an injunction ent
Richardson v. Relfpublic domain
Supreme Court of Alabama · 2018-05-04 · Published · cited 0× · 265 So. 3d 236
MAIN, Justice. Ed Richardson and Reginald Eggleston, individually and in their official capacities as interim superintendent of the Alabama Department of Education and chief administrative officer of the Alabama State Board of Education, respectively, and Gordon Stone, individually and in his official capacity as mayor of the Town of Pike Road (hereinafter collectively referred to as "the defendants"), appeal from an injunction ent
Santana v. Cowenpublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2019-02-14 · Published · cited 1× · 361 F. Supp. 3d 115
YOUNG, D.J. I. INTRODUCTION César Santana ("Santana") petitions this Court for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pet. Writ Habeas Corpus ("Pet."), ECF No. 1. Brad Cowen ("Cowen"), Superintendent of Massachusetts Correctional Institution ("MCI") Norfolk, opposes Santana's