Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

2 opinions for “Duquesne-Duquesne v. Hanberry”

Higgins v. Hermespublic domain

New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976-07-13 · Published · cited 21× · 552 P.2d 1227; 89 N.M. 379

SUTIN, Judge (specially concurring). I concur in the result. A. Allegations of damage to the body and mind are general, not special, damages. The opinion does not meet the challenge of defendant. Defendant claims that Dr. Salazar’s testimony on clinical psychology was inadmissible because the complaint did not

read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · find the judge →

Kasel v. Remington Arms Co.public domain

California Court of Appeal · 1972-04-04 · Published · cited 82× · 24 Cal. App. 3d 711; 101 Cal. Rptr. 314; 1972 Cal. App. LEXIS 1164

Opinion REPPY, J. This is an appeal from a judgment on a jury verdict for defendant and respondent, Remington Arms Company, Inc., a Delaware corporation, having its home office in Connecticut (hereinafter, Remington), and against plaintiff and appellant Edward W. Kasel (hereinafter, plaintiff), in an action for personal injuries and damages arising out of the explosion of a 12-gauge shotgun shell.

read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · company profile: Remington Arms Co. → · find the judge →