Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge. This case involves a dispute between the Office of Federal Contract Compliance *74 Programs and United Space Alliance, LLC. OFCCP, an agency within the Department of Labor, is responsible for ensuring that federal contractors

567 F.Supp. 1457 (1983) Harvey PRIDGEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Elma Speight FARMER, et al., Defendants. No. 83-35-CIV-8. United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Wilson Division. July 25, 1983. *1458 Robert A. Singer, John H. Small, Brooks, Pierce, McLendon, Humphrey & Leonard, Greensboro, N.C., Charles L. McLawhorn

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DAVID LAZARUS, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:20-cv-1787-RCL KARIZAD, LLC and WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION On December 27, 2019, David Lazarus filed a complaint in District of Columbia Superior Court against two entities, Karizad, LLC (“Karizad”) and Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB (“Wilmington”), seeking legal and equitable relief for their alleged wrongful foreclosure of his home. Complaint

McClendon, j. |2In this appeal, Royce Toney, the former Sheriff of Ouachita Parish, challenges a declaratory opinion of the Louisiana Board of Ethics (Ethics Board), finding that Sheriff Toney could not use his campaign funds to pay legal fees that he incurred in connection with the defense of criminal charges against him contained in a federal indictment. For the reasons that follow, we affirm. FACTUAL

Memorandum Opinion KEITH STARRETT, District Judge. For the reasons, provided below, the Court finds that Hattiesburg, Mississippi’s current ward plan does not dilute the voting or political power of African-American citizens in violation of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. I. Background Hattiesburg, Mississippi, has a “mayor-council” form of

(2008) HORNBECK OFFSHORE TRANSPORTATION, LLC, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Civil Action No. 07-1030 (RCL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. July 1, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge. Now before the Court comes defendant United States of America's motion [11] to dismiss for

487 F.Supp. 1049 (1980) Wit CARSON, Plaintiff, and Paces Ferry Action Committee, Inc., Intervenor Plaintiff, v. William H. ALVORD, Robert P. Boblett, D. P. Boothe, Jr., Ernest V. Buckman, Robert T. Cross, Victor A. Lalli, Royce N. Sanner, Craig R. Stapleton, Ridgeley P. Ware, as Trustees of IDS Realty Trust, A Business Trust Created under the laws of Massachusetts, Moon Landrieu, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, and Ernest Barr

OPINION This appeal concerns the requirements of Texas Health Safety Code, section 752.003, a statute mandating safety procedures to be used when work is done near high voltage electrical lines. The trial court granted summary judgment for E.B. Hicks, a cotton farmer in Gaines County, Texas, on the ground that Hicks was not a person responsible for an activity in proximity to overhead electrical lines. Plain

Tax Refund Suit; STARS Structured Transaction Between BB & T Bank and Bar-clays Bank; Availability of Foreign Tax Credits From Payment of United Kingdom Taxes; Deductions for Interest and Transaction Costs; Economic Substance Doctrine Applied to Trust and Loan Components of Transaction; Assessment of Penalties. OPINION AND ORDER WHEELER, Judge. In this tax refund case, t

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2023-CA-01126-SCT IN RE VALIDATION OF UP TO $27,600,000 TRUST CERTIFICATES EVIDENCING PROPORTIONAL INTERESTS IN A LEASE BY THE SIMPSON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT: THOMAS FLOYD, RAY FLOYD, LEE McCOY, AND JASON McCOY v. SIMPSON COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/22/2023 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. GERALD MARION MARTIN TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: WESLA ANN LEECH-SULLIVAN

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 10-192T (Filed: September 20, 2013) *********************************** * * SALEM FINANCIAL, INC., * Tax Refund Suit; STARS Structured * Transaction Between BB&T Bank and Plaintiff, * Barclays Bank; Availability of Foreign

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 10-192T (Filed: September 20, 2013) *********************************** * * SALEM FINANCIAL, INC., * Tax Refund Suit; STARS Structured * Transaction Between BB&T Bank and Plaintiff, * Barclays Bank; Availability of Foreign

Opinion for the Court filed by Chief Judge WALD. WALD, Chief Judge: Appellant, a veteran with a long history of psychiatric treatment, appeals from a district court judgment dismissing his various claims for relief stemming from the unauthorized release by the Veterans’ Administration (“VA”) of his private medical records. We affirm the dismissal of Doe

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge WILLIAMS. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge: Edward Spannaus filed this Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) suit, 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(B) (1982), to compel the Federal Bureau of Investigation to disclose certain material he requested in two separate letters nearly eight years earlier. The District Court dismissed his suit

SPOTTSWOOD W. ROBINSON, III, Chief Judge, concurring: I join in the court’s judgment and, save on one point, in its opinion. Though I agree on affirmance, I have difficulty with the court’s position on the relationship of the discretionary function exemption to neurologic testing in airman medical certification procedures. I thus write to elucidate my approach to questions of application of the exemption, an

This is a Workmen's Compensation case. In response to special issues the jury found the claimant, Barbara C. Bradshaw, was totally disabled for a period of 260 weeks. Judgment was entered in accordance with the jury findings, payable in a lump sum. Appellee was an employee of the Methodist *Page 833 Hospital in Lubbock, Texas, and alleged she was injured on January 6, 1960 while in the course of her employment. She alleged she received injuries to

HATCHETT, Circuit Judge: In this employment discrimination case, we review the district court’s finding that appellee, Western Electric Company, Inc., rebutted appellants’ prima facie cases under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1981 (West 1981) and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e-17 (West 1981). We also review the di

ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV