Cases

369 S.E.2d 673 (1988) Henry E. I. duPONT, et al. v. V. R. SHACKELFORD, Jr., et al. Record No. 850443. Supreme Court of Virginia. June 10, 1988. *674 Morris L. Weisberg, Robert W. Wooldridge, Marvin Comisky, Philadelphia, Pa., Taras M. Wochok, Paoli, Pa., Blank, Rome, Comisky & McCauley, Philadelphia, Pa., on briefs, for appel

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STATE OF DELAWARE : ID No. 2210012695 : v. : : ROBERT W. DRAPER, : : Defendant. : Submitted: November 11, 2024 Decided: January 9, 2025

Botsford, J. After he left a voicemail message for a probation officer in which he implied that he could cause harm to her young daughter, the defendant, Kenneth G. Hamilton, was charged by complaint and subsequently convicted by a jury of threatening to commit a crime, in violation of G. L. c. 275, § 2, *424and intimidating a witness, in violation of G. L. c. 268, § 13B.

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER RESERVING RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION PENDING A SUMMARY TRIAL Clark Waddoups, United' States District Judge Sixty-seven plaintiffs1 have sued Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo & Company (“Wells Fargo”) for engaging in various unauthorized and fraudulent activities using them p

17 A.3d 873 (2011) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. James Melvin SMITH, Appellant. No. 591 CAP. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted July 1, 2010. Decided March 29, 2011. *879 Cristi A. Charpentier, Billy Horatio Nolas, Defender Association of Philadelphia, *880 M

963 F.Supp. 1361 (1997) Brenda POKOL, Plaintiff, v. E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND CO., INC., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 96-626(AJL). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. March 20, 1997. *1362 *1363 James P. Madden, Klausner & Hunter, Somerville, NJ, for Plaintiff. St

616 S.W.2d 543 (1981) Juanita Sue CARTER, Appellant, v. James L. CARTER, Respondent. No. WD 31462. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. May 4, 1981. *544 Ralph E. Pratt, Independence, for appellant. Joe L. Anderson, Kansas City, for respondent. Before KENNEDY, P. J., and SHANGLER and SOMERVILLE, JJ. K

34 Mass. App. Ct. 744 (1993) 616 N.E.2d 118 W. OLIVER TRIPP COMPANY vs. AMERICAN HOECHST CORPORATION. No. 91-P-953. Appeals Court of Massachusetts, Norfolk. December 17, 1992. July 14, 1993. Present: KASS, JACOBS, & GREENBERG, JJ. Floyd H. Anderson for the plaintiff. Thomas J. Dougherty (Edm

31 F.Supp.2d 226 (1998) M.R. (VEGA ALTA), INC.; Santa Cruz, Inc.; Gomera (Dorado), Inc., and Monte Rey S.E., Plaintiffs, v. CARIBE GENERAL ELECTRIC PRODUCTS, INC.; General Electric Company; West Company of Puerto Rico, Inc.; The West Company, Inc.; Motorola Electronica de Puerto Rico, Inc.; Motorola International Development Corporation; Unisys Corporation; Harman Automotive Puerto Rico, Inc., and Harman Industries, Inc., Defendants.

WASSERSTROM, Judge. Relator Litton Business Systems, Inc., filed application for a writ to prohibit the respondent trial judge from enforcing his order requiring relator to answer certain interrogatories. This court issued its preliminary rule of prohibition on September 4, 1974. The underlying litigation before respondent was instituted by a petition of Litton Industries Credit Corporation against Broadw

797 F.Supp. 1196 (1992) Fred WERNER and Paul Oberkircher, as Trustee of the Radiology Medical Associates Money Purchase Pension Trust, Plaintiffs, v. SATTERLEE, STEPHENS, BURKE & BURKE, as Successor to Satterlee & Stephens, Defendant. No. 89 Civ. 5130 (CSH). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 28, 1992. *1197

345 A.2d 465 (1975) UNITED STATES, Appellant, v. Alan Duane SEDGWICK, Appellee. No. 8125. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued January 16, 1975. Decided September 30, 1975. Stay Denied December 15, 1975. *466 Edward D. Ross, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., with whom Earl J. Silbert, U. S. Atty.,

ACCEPTED 15-25-00022-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 9/26/2025 10:33 PM No. 15-25-00022-CV CHRIST

ACCEPTED 03-14-00706-CV 4055487 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

We are constrained to modify the challenged order by the deletion of the provision enjoining appellants from "operating" their "quarry property and business * * *, or any part or branch" thereof, "in such manner as to cause, by blasting of stone, the houses of complainants, or any of them, or any part or parts of their houses, to vibrate * * *." At the outset, it would seem that an injunction against any and all vibration, irrespective of ensuing damage to respondents, plainly goes bey

190 Va. 339 (1950) WALTER RUSSELL BURTON AND GRACE E. BURTON v. DAVID DIXON RUSSELL. Record No. 3553. Supreme Court of Virginia. January 16, 1950. William Old, for the plaintiffs in error. Rooke & Merhige, for the defendant in error. Present, All the Justices. 1. Where the award of an infant's custody is in question, courts exercise e

SOMERVILLE, J. The bill is filed by the City of Demopolis, a municipal corporation, to restrain the continuance of a fence erected by John 0-. Webb, one of the defendants, across Arch street, a highway in said town, said obstruction being alleged to be a public nuisance, and sought to be abated as such. The bill further seeks to restrain the alleged unlawful collection of wharfage by the said Webb and his co-defendants, at a stea

Mr. Justice Cardozo delivered the opinion of the Court. On April 9, 1931, James M. Kiley was shot to death at a gasoline station at Somerville, Massachusetts. Three men, Garrick, Donnellon and the petitioner Snyder, joined in the murder and in the attempted robbery that led to it. Garrick confessed to his part in the crime and became a witness for the state. Donnellon and Snyder were tried together and sentence

MARSHALL, Circuit Justice. William Brown, a citizen of Virginia, and Boyd Miller, a British subject, entered into partnership, and carried on trade and commerce, by the name of “William Brown & Co.” During the partnership, William Brown purchased a house and lot in Lynchburg, with the funds and for the benefit of the company, but took the conveyance to himself. Some time in the year 1811, William Brown departed this life, h

HEAL, J. On January 3, 1889, Yon. L. Thompson, then engaged in the book, stationery and printing business in Anniston, Ala., sold and conveyed to his mother, C. A. Thompson, the bulk of his stock of goods, and assigned the residue of his assets to J. H. Nunnelee, as trustee for the benefit of his creditors. The recited consideration of the deed to his mother was its acceptance by her in payment of an indebtedness of $8,977.20, bo