Cases

315 S.W.3d 673 (2010) COMCAST CABLE OF PLANO, INC., Appellant, v. CITY OF PLANO, Texas, Appellee. No. 05-09-00754-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. June 24, 2010. *675 Elizann Carroll, Richard Law Group, Dallas, TX, Robert G. Scott, Davis, Wright, Tremaine, LLP, Washington, DC, for Appellant. William David Dunn, Shery

578 F.3d 279 (2009) Linda SANDERS-BURNS, Individually and as an heir of the Estate of Anthony Demille Sanders, deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF PLANO; Joseph Cabezuela, Police Officer, Defendants-Appellees. No. 08-40459. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. August 7, 2009. *281 Michael R. Dezsi (argued), Paul W

594 F.3d 366 (2010) Linda SANDERS-BURNS, Individually and as an heir of the Estate of Anthony Demille Sanders, deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF PLANO; Joseph Cabezuela, Police Officer, Defendants-Appellees. No. 08-40459. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. January 11, 2010. *369 Michael R. Dezsi (argued), Paul

540 F.Supp.2d 717 (2008) AMERICAN COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, LLC d/b/a Star Community Newspapers, Plaintiff, v. The CITY OF PLANO, Defendant. No. 4:06cv295. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Sherman Division. February 8, 2008. *718 John Randolph Thompson, III, Bridget Alison Blinn, J. Frank Kinsel, Jr., Cantey & Hanger, Fo

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER AMOS L. MAZZANT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Pending before the Court is Defendant James Hemen’s Motion for New Trial (Dkt. #115). Having considered the motion, the response, and the relevant documents, the Court is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. *631BACKGROUND T

*331JAMES E. GRAVES, JR., Circuit Judge, dissenting: Under cover of darkness, at approximately five o’clock in the morning, a police officer walked through an alleyway to the door of Holley’s attached, rear-entry garage.1 The officer brought along a drug-detection dog who allegedly “alerted to the presence of the odor of an il

ACCEPTED 15-24-00114-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 10/2/2025 11:45 AM NO. 15-24-00114-CV

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 20a0371p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, Attorney General │ Daniel Cameron, ex rel. DANVILLE CHRI

Justice HECHT delivered the opinion of the Court. An electric utility sued two regional public transportation authorities, which are governmental entities, to condemn an easement across their land for use in constructing a transmission line approved by the Public Utility Commission (“PUC”). A divided court of appeals upheld the authorities’ assertion of governmental immunity and dismissed the case.1

205 P.3d 299 (2009) Representative Wes KELLER; Representative Mike Kelly; Senator Fred Dyson; Senator Tom Wagoner; and Representative Bob Lynn, Appellants, v. Senator Hollis FRENCH; Senator Kim Elton; Stephen E. Branchflower; Alaska Legislative Council; Senator Lyda Green; Senate Judiciary Committee; Dianne Kiesel; Annette Kreitzer; Janice Mason; Nicki Neal; Michael Nizich; Kristina Perry; and Brad Thompson, Appellees. No. S

JAMES L. DENNIS, Circuit Judge: The defendants, James Romans, Bajune Moseby, Kevin Harden, and Terrance Booker, were convicted by a jury of conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute 1,000 kilograms or more of marijuana, 21 U.S.C. § 846. The district court sentenced Romans to life imprisonment; Moseby to 293 months’ imprisonment; Harden to 360 months’ imprisonment; and Booker to 280 months’ imprisonment. For the fol

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND FINAL JUDGMENT RODNEY. GILSTRAP, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Iris Connex filed suit against eighteen manufacturers of smartphones and tablets, claiming each infringed the Plaintiffs only asset, U.S. Patent No. 6,177,950, which is entitled “Multifunction*832al portable telephone.”

REVERSE AND REMAND and Opinion Filed November 29, 2021 In The Court of Appeals Stith Avatrict of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-01480-CV PRO-FIRE & SPRINKLER, L.L.C. AND JAMES C. LANKFORD, Appellants V. THE LAW COMPANY, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the 95th District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-18762 OPINION Before Justices Myers, Osborne, and Carlyle Opinion by Justice Osborne In this restricted appeal, appellants Pro-Fire & Sprinkler, L.L.C. and Jam

OSCN Found Document:DRUMMOND v. OKLAHOMA STATEWIDE VIRTUAL CHARTER SCHOOL BOARD Previous Case Top Of Index This Point in Index Citationize Next Case Print Only

OSCN Found Document:DRUMMOND v. OKLAHOMA STATEWIDE VIRTUAL CHARTER SCHOOL BOARD Previous Case Top Of Index This Point in Index Citationize Next Case Print Only

(2008) FREE MARKET FOUNDATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. David A. REISMAN, et al., Defendants. Case No. A-08-CA-116-SS. United States District Court, W.D. Texas, Austin Division. August 21, 2008. ORDER SAM SPARKS, District Judge. BE IT REMEMBERED on the 8th day of August 2008 the Court held a hearing in the above-styled cause, and the par

(2008) HIGHLAND VILLAGE PARENTS GROUP, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION; Janice W. Brown, in Her Official Capacity as Division Administrator of the United States Federal Highway Administration, Texas Division; J. Richard Capka in His Official Capacity as Administrator of the United States Federal Highway Administration; United States Department of Transportation; Mary E. Peters, in Her Official Capacity as Secretary of T

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 17a0207p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT PETER CARL BORMUTH, ┐ Plaintiff-Appellant, │

295 S.W.3d 287 (2009) Pastor Rick BARR and Philemon Homes, Inc., Petitioners, v. CITY OF SINTON, Respondent. No. 06-0074. Supreme Court of Texas. Argued March 22, 2007. Decided June 19, 2009. *289 James C. Ho (argued), Mark Whitburn, Scott H. Mellon, Michael Sean Royall, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Dallas, TX

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1591 NANCY LUND; LIESA MONTAG-SIEGEL; ROBERT VOELKER, Plaintiffs - Appellees, v. ROWAN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, Defendant - Appellant. ---------------------------- STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA; STATE OF ALABAMA; STATE OF ARIZONA; STATE OF ARKANSAS; STATE OF FLORIDA; STATE OF INDIAN