Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR REARGUMENT, RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT FREDERICK P. STAMP, JR., District Judge. I. Background1 This action arose out of a longstanding dispute between the plaintiff, James P. McGee (“McGee”), and one of the fifteen named defendants, James Dunn (“D

DECISION AND ORDER DAVID G. LARIMER, District Judge. INTRODUCTION These seven cases, which have been consolidated for all purposes under Rule 42(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, *371have been brought by participants and beneficiaries of the Savings and Investment Plan (“SIP”) of Eastman Kodak Company (“Koda

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge, dissenting: When a three-judge court is forced into the unwanted position of fashioning interim redistricting plans, the focus should be on practicality, balance, and moderation, albeit with unbending adherence to the Voting Rights Act (“VRA”) and the Constitution. The judges in the majority, with the purest of intentions, have instead produced a runaway plan that imposes an extrem

WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge. Miguel Perez, an inmate at Lawrence Correctional Center, brought an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against various prison officials alleging cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment. According to his pro se complaint, prison officials were deliberately indifferent to his severe hand injury, delaying his receipt of medically necessar

340 S.W.3d 444 (2011) CMH HOMES, et al., Petitioners, v. Adam PEREZ, Respondent. No. 10-0688. Supreme Court of Texas. Argued February 3, 2011. Decided May 27, 2011. *446 Brendan K. McBride, The McBride Law Firm, Rio Grande City, David L. Rumley, Wigington Rumley Dunn LLP, Corpus Christi, and Baldemar Gutierrez, L

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT OREGON RESTAURANT AND No. 13-35765 LODGING ASSOCIATION, a non-profit Oregon corporation; WASHINGTON D.C. No. RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION, a non- 3:12-cv-01261- profit Washington corporation; MO ALASKA CABARET, HOTEL, RESTAURANT & RETAILERS ASSOCIATION, a non-profit Alaska corporation; NATIONAL RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION, a non- profit Illinois

328 S.W.3d 592 (2010) CMH HOMES, INC.; Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance Company, Inc.; Bruce Robin Moore, Jr., Appellants, v. Adam PEREZ, Appellee. No. 04-10-00259-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio. July 28, 2010. Augustin Rivera Jr., Dunn, Weathered, Coffey, Rivera & Kasperitis, Jorge C. Rangel, Attorney at Law, Corpus Christi, TX, Scott A. Brister, Lin

NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557- 1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us SJC-13454 COMMONWEALTH vs. WARREN W. DUNN. Plymouth. January

248 F.Supp.2d 106 (2003) Robert J. STACK, Plaintiff v. Lourdes PEREZ, et al., Defendants No. 3-.01-CV-260 (EBB). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. February 26, 2003. *108 James S. Brewer, Erin I. O'Neil-Baker, West Hartford, CT, John T. Forrest, Law Offices of John T. Forrest, LLC, Hartford, CT, for plaintiff.

COWART, Judge. The owner-payee of a negotiable promissory note sued the makers-payors, alleging that the makers-payors had defaulted in *272payment of the note and also alleging that the original note had been lost or destroyed. In addition to other matters of defense, the makers-payors claimed that, procedurally, the plaintiff, as owner-payee of the lost or destroyed not

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

Myron H. Thompson, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE In this long-standing lawsuit, the court previously found that the Alabama Department of Corrections (ADOC) has failed to provide adequate mental-health care to inmates in its custody in violation of the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution. See Braggs v. Dunn ,

USCA11 Case: 21-10670 Document: 49-1 Date Filed: 01/30/2024 Page: 1 of 55 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-10670 ____________________ MARQUES A. JOHNSON,

USCA11 Case: 21-10670 Document: 42-1 Date Filed: 10/02/2023 Page: 1 of 55 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-10670 ____________________ MARQUES A. JOHNSON,

Filed 9/6/23 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Yolo) ---- THE PEOPLE, C095414 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. CR20202968) v. FERMIN PEREZ-ROBLE

Filed 9/18/23 (unmodified opinion attached) CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION * IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Yolo) ---- THE PEOPLE, C095414 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. CR202

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-1171 ROCK HEMP CORP., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ADAM DUNN, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 21-2130 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Christopher Mateo Perez

Gray H. Miller, United States District Judge Pending before the court is a motion for summary judgment filed by defendant National Coupling Company, Inc. d/b/a Hunting Energy Services ("NCC").1 Dkt. 31. *756Additionally, plaintiff Byron Dunn filed numerous objections to evidence in his response to t

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 19-1538 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. RAFAEL PÉREZ-RODRÍGUEZ, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Pedro A. Delgado-Hernández, U.S. District Judge]