Cases

SUAREZ, J. This appeal is taken from a declaratory judgment finding the City of Miami Charter precludes the appellant, City Commissioner Michelle Spence-Jones, from seeking reelection for a third consecutive term. On appeal, as below, the parties dispute the effect of the charter provision stating, “[N]o mayor or city commissioner elected and qualified for two consecutive full terms shall be eligible for reelection in the next

Notice: This opinion is subject to correction before publication in the PACIFIC REPORTER. Readers are requested to bring errors to the attention of the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, 303 K Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99501, phone (907) 264-0608, fax (907) 264-0878, email corrections@akcourts.us. THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA NICHOLAS RYAN DUNN, ) ) Supreme Court No. S-16685

Dismissed.

Dismissed.

Johnson, J., dissenting in part: I dissent from that portion of the majority opinion that holds that a district court — part of the judicial branch of our government — has the authority (jurisdiction) to convict a person of a crime when the prosecutor — part of the executive branch of our government — has failed to charge that person with any crime under Kansas law. The executive branch is charged with enforcing the laws, includ

PER CURIAM. This controversy arises on a motion for appeal from a judgment, based on a jury verdict, settling a boundary dispute. The parties are adjoining property owners, and the judgment confirmed the boundary established by their respective deeds. Appellants claim title by adverse possession and estoppel. They contend they were entitled to a directed verdict and that the instructions were erroneous.</

PER CURIAM. DISMISSED. See Simmons v. Agency for Health Care Admin., 950 So.2d 431 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007); Rowell v. Dept. of Law Enforcement, 700 So.2d 1242 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997); see generally Bondi v. Tucker, 93 So.3d 1106 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012). THOMAS, CLARK, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

JONES, Justice I. Nature op the Case Linda Dunn (“Linda”) appeals from a district court’s judgment affirming the Idaho State Tax Commission’s (the “Commission”) deficiency determination. The Commission issued a deficiency against Linda after determining that her one-half community interest in her husband’s, Barry Dunn

15 So.3d 302 (2009) Eric ALEXANDER, Raymond Weber, Tamara Alexander, Robert J. Alexander, and Toya Alexander, Plaintiffs-Appellees v. Othell DUNN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 44,272-CA. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. June 3, 2009. Rehearing Denied June 18, 2009. *303 William A. Jones, Jr., for Appella

Chappell, J. Relator, hereinafter called plaintiff, filed a petition in the district court for Lancaster County against respondent, hereinafter called defendant, alleging that plaintiff was unlawfully deprived of his liberty and praying for a writ of habeas corpus and discharge from unlawful imprisonment, namely, solitary confinement in the Nebraska State Penitentiary. Plaintiff’s petition alleged in substan

626 S.E.2d 174 (2006) 277 Ga. App. 209 DUNN v. The STATE. No. A05A2188. Court of Appeals of Georgia. January 11, 2006. James T. Jones, Jr., Thomson, for appellant. Dennis C. Sanders, District Attorney, William P. Doupé, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee. RUFFIN, Chief Judge. A jury found Chad Dunn guilty of posses

OPINION BY JUDGE ROBERT J. HUMPHREYS *584This appeal essentially calls for us to ascertain the legislative intent of that portion of Code § 18.2-248 with respect to the impact on the sentencing range of a prior conviction for a similar offense as an accommodation. Following a bench trial on May 31, 2017, the Circuit Court of He

271 S.W.3d 867 (2008) D'Juana DUNN, Individually and as Next Friend for J.D., Appellant, v. CLAIRMONT TYLER, LP and Colonial Tyler Care Center, LP, Appellees. No. 12-07-00287-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Tyler. November 26, 2008. *868 Marisa Schouten, Blake Bailey, for appellant. Gregory D. Smith, Rosemary Sage Jones, fo

WIENER, Circuit Judge: The sole issue presented by this appeal from the United States Tax Court (the “Tax Court”) is the fair market value of a block of common stock in Dunn Equipment, Inc. (“Dunn Equipment” or the “Corporation”) owned by the late Beatrice Ellen Jones Dunn (the “Decedent”) on the date of her death (the “valuation date”) for purposes of calculating the estate tax

JjJudge MAX N. TOBIAS, JR. Allstate Insurance Company (“Allstate”) has filed this appeal to address the manner in which the trial court calculated the plaintiffs damages. After reviewing the record, we amend the judgment and affirm the judgment as amended. The plaintiff, Leonard Dunn, sustained personal injuries after he was involved in a car accident with the defendant, Claire Builodeau. Mr. Dunn filed s

The opinion of the court was delivered by Burch, C. J.: Because of the method adopted in framing the original opinion, it seems the rock-bottom basis of the decision has not been clearly apprehended. After stating the facts the court said we must look to the statute to ascertain what kind of insurance policy a motor carrier must furnish. The court then identified the controlling statute an

PER CURIAM: After considering the parties’ briefs and entertaining oral argument, we affirm the district court’s judgment. For the reasons stated in the court’s May 26, 2005 order granting appellee summary judgment, the record is insufficient to make out a claim under either count of appellant’s complaint. AFFIRMED.

In re Alphonso, Chris;—Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. I, No. 441,489; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 99 CA 1128. ' Denied.

The opinion of the court was delivered by Burch, C. J.: The action was one by the personal representatives of Edward S. Dunn, deceased, to recover from C. H. Jones damages consequent on Dunn’s .death, which resulted from injuries inflicted by Jones in negligent operation of a motor truck. Damages were also claimed for injury to Dunn’s property in the same accident. Joined with the action against Jones was ano

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GETTLEMAN, District Judge. Plaintiffs Thomas Dunn (“Dunn”) and Denny Robinson (“Robinson”), individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, filed a four-count putative class action against defendant City of Chicago (“City”) pursuant to *37042 U.S.C. § 1983 on October 21,2004. Plaintiffs allege th