Cases

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 07a0163p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Petitioner-Appellan

OPINION MERRITT, Circuit Judge. Todd Dunham is serving a 299-month prison sentence for conspiracy to distribute marijuana, cocaine and heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846 and being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). In this appeal, he challenges the District Court’s denial of his motion under 28 U.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

CCA 20150467. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the assigned issue, and the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.

ORDER Darren Dunham falsified income tax returns for customers of his return-preparation business so that they would receive the earned income tax credit. He then kept part of the refund checks as his fee and gave the remainder to his customers. Dunham continued the scheme for more than two years — even after he had pleaded guilty to five counts of aiding the preparation and filing of false returns, 26 U.S.C. § 7206(2). All told he pr

PER CURIAM: Leroy Dunham, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582 (West 2000 & Supp.2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Dunham, No. 1:95-er-00234-BEL (D.Md. Apr. 18, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and lega

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

5(&200(1'(' )25 )8//7(;7 38%/,&$7,21 3XUVXDQW WR 6L[WK &LUFXLW 5XOH  (/(&7521,& &,7$7,21  )(' $SS 3 WK &LU )LOH 1DPH DS 81,7('67$7(6&28572)$33($/6 )257+(6,;7+&,5&8,7 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 81,7(' 67$7(6 2) $0(5,&$ ; 3ODLQWLII$SSHOOHH    1RV Y

161 F.Supp.2d 609 (2001) UNITED STATES of America v. Stanley L. DUNHAM, Jr. No. AMD 01-0106. United States District Court, D. Maryland. September 4, 2001. *610 Kathryn Frey Balter, Baltimore, MD, for defendant. Lisa M. Griffin, Office of U.S. Attorney, Baltimore, MD, for U.S. MEMORANDUM DAVIS, Distr

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

301 F.Supp. 700 (1969) Carroll DUNHAM, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, v. SECOND NATIONAL BANK OF NEW HAVEN, Third-Party Defendant. Civ. No. 11572. United States District Court D. Connecticut. May 9, 1969. *701 Arthur C. Williams, Williams, Smith & Runyon, Bridgeport, Conn.

RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO IMPLEAD THE SECOND NATIONAL BANK OF NEW HAVEN ZAMPANO, District Judge. This is an action for refund of tax paid pursuant to a penalty assessment under the provisions of 26 U.S.C. §§ 6671(a) and 6672. The assessment arose out of the failure of J. A. Otterbein, Inc., a bankrupt corporation, to pay $10,987.89 in taxes withheld from the wages of its employees. The penalty asses

[PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FEB 07 2001 ___________________________

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Bonnie Ann DUNHAM, a.k.a., Bonnie Ann McDuffee, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Respondent-Appellee, v. Bonnie Ann Dunham, a.k.a., Bonnie Ann McDuffee, Petitioner-Appellant. Nos. 00-10543

PER CURIAM. This is an appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky denying the appellant’s motion to vacate his sentence under Section 2255, Title 28, U.S.C. The appellant, Sidney Dunham, was convicted on three counts of an indictment charging the unlawful sale and possession of mari

BACKGROUND McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge: In this appeal we are called upon to review police conduct at the dimly-lit intersection of common sense and Fourth Amendment jurisprudence. An anonymous tipster called 911 to complain that men with guns were in a certain car (perfectly described) on Plymouth Avenue and that the men had taken a shot at the tipster a week earlier. Police officers dr

OPINION KEITH, Circuit Judge. Defendants-Appellants Todd Allen Dun-ham (“Dunham”) and Arturo Alderete-Monsivais (“Alderete-Monsivais”) were participants in a drug conspiracy that imported large quantities of marijuana and cocaine from the Republic of Mexico to drug dealers in the Lansing, Michigan area. The drugs were then distributed to numerous locatio

886 F.2d 1312 U.S.v.Dunham* NO. 89-2343 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. SEP 11, 1989 1 Appeal From: E.D.Tex. 2