Cases

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Larry E. Patterson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for relief judgment, filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Patterson’s info

ORDER AND REASONS HELEN G. BERRIGAN, District Judge. Currently pending before the Court is Omega Protein Inc.’s (“Omega”) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Rec. Doc. 23. Plaintiff Ed Patterson opposes. Rec. Doc. 27. Having considered the record, the law, and the submissions of counsel, the motion will be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. I. Background

*********** The undersigned reviewed the prior Opinion and Award, based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Phillips. The appealing party has shown good ground to reconsider the evidence; receive further evidence; rehear the parties or their representatives; and having reviewed the competent evidence of record, the Full Commission reverses the Opinion and Award of Deputy Commissioner Phillips and enters the following Op

684 S.E.2d 838 (2009) 55 Va. App. 175 Henry Ray DUNCAN, Jr., s/k/a Henry Ray Duncan, II v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia. Record No. 2397-08-3. Court of Appeals of Virginia, Salem. November 17, 2009. J. Patterson Rogers, 3rd, for appellant. Kathleen B. Martin, Senior Assistant Attorney General (William C. Mims, Attorney General, on brief),

PER CURIAM: Pearl B. Matthews appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Matthews v. Patterson, No. 5:05-cv-00842-BO (E.D.N.C. June 14, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the cour

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: In these consolidated cases, Erwin B. Patterson, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s orders cumulatively dismissing all defendants from this civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: In these consolidated cases, Erwin B. Patterson, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s orders cumulatively dismissing all defendants from this civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

DUNCAN, J. In this dissolution case, husband appeals the trial court’s division of the parties’ marital property.1 Husband argues that the trial court erred by concluding that the parties’ separation agreement controlled the division of their property at dissolution. Specifically, he argues: (1) the parties did not intend the separation agreement to control the division of their property at dissolu

544 S.E.2d 735 (2001) 247 Ga. App. 555 GUNTER v. PATTERSON BANK. No. A00A2163. Court of Appeals of Georgia. January 16, 2001. *736 Fred R. Kopp, Alma, for appellant. Fendig, McLemore, Taylor, Whitworth & Durham, Philip R. Taylor, Brunswick, Beth M. Duncan, for appellee. MIKELL, Judge.

219 S.W.3d 514 (2007) Lewie BYERS and Forrest Williams, Appellants, v. Jerry PATTERSON, Commissioner of the General Land Office, Texas General Land Office, Chevron USA, Inc., Goldston Oil Corp., Samson Lone Star Limited Partnership, Oxy USA, Inc., Jack Phillips, Gail Mizer, Lee Wallace, Virginia Wallace, Harold Neff & Associates, Inc., Dorice Baker, Bank of America, N.A., Henry Bell, John Allen Bell, Maryhelen Boice, J.R. Brewer, W.M. Burney,

936 P.2d 863 (1997) 1997-NMCA-028 123 N.M. 181 Donald D. DUNCAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Thomas K. CAMPBELL II; Thomas E. Lilley; Arnold N. Miller; W.F. Roberts, Jr.; Joe W. Jernigan; and Miller, Roberts & Jernigan, Defendants-Appellees. No. 17142. Court of Appeals of New Mexico. February 24, 1997. Certiorari

566 F.3d 138 (2009) IOTA XI CHAPTER OF SIGMA CHI FRATERNITY, George Mason University; Ryan Duckwitz, Consul, Iota Xi Chapter of Sigma Chi Fraternity; Justin Pietro, Pro Consul, Iota Xi Chapter of Sigma Chi Fraternity, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Pamela PATTERSON, Associate Dean of Students, individually and in her official capacity; Michele Goubadia, Associate Director for Student Activities, Greek Life, individually and in her official capacity; G

900 F.Supp. 547 (1995) David D. DUNCAN, Sr., Walter J. Patterson, Robert M. Sullivan and Charles V. DeGeorge, as Trustees of the Teamsters Health Services and Insurance Plan of Local 404, Plaintiffs, v. Robert M. SANTANIELLO, Jay A. Posnik and Savino J. Basile, Individually and as They are Partners d/b/a Santaniello, Posnik, Basile and Rideout, and Edward J. Partyka, Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. David D. DUNCAN, Sr., Michael

879 S.W.2d 836 (1994) Donald G. THRAILKILL, For Himself and as Next of Kin to Pamela A. Thrailkill, Deceased, Plaintiff/Appellant/Appellee, v. James K. PATTERSON, Rushton E. Patterson, and Rushton E. Patterson, Jr., d/b/a Patterson Gynecology & Obstetrics, A Partnership, Defendants/Appellees/Appellants. Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Jackson. June 27, 1994. Duncan E. Ragsdale, M

429 S.E.2d 215 (1993) Terry Lee PATTERSON v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. Record No. 921044. Supreme Court of Virginia. April 16, 1993. *216 William S. Sands, Jr., Fairfax (Howard A. Spier, Fort Lauderdale, FL, McChesney, Duncan & Dale, Fairfax, Sams, Spier & Hastings, Fort Lauderdale, FL, on briefs), for appellant. Jo

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Isaac Patterson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Patterson v. Muse, No. 2

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, United States District Judge This is an excessive force case brought under the Fourth Amendment. Before the court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 95.) On September 3, 2015, the United States Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation to grant the motion, and notice was served on the parties in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). (Doc. 118.) Pla

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT VIRGINIA DUNCAN; PATRICK No. 23-55805 LOVETTE; DAVID MARGUGLIO; CHRISTOPHER WADDELL; D.C. No. CALIFORNIA RIFLE & PISTOL 3:17-cv-01017- ASSOCIATION, INC., a California BEN-JLB corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees, ORDER v. ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California,

43 B.R. 833 (1984) In re Malcolm E. DUNCAN and Genita P. Duncan, Debtors. In re Marion GEORGE, d/b/a Marion George Janitorial, Debtor. Bankruptcy Nos. 3-83-00161, 3-83-00216. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Alaska. August 10, 1984. *834 M. Jane Pettigrew of Yerbich & Stanley, Anchorage, Alaska, for Malcolm E. Duncan and Genita

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT VIRGINIA DUNCAN; PATRICK No. 23-55805 LOVETTE; DAVID MARGUGLIO; CHRISTOPHER WADDELL; D.C. No. CALIFORNIA RIFLE & PISTOL 3:17-cv-01017- ASSOCIATION, INC., a California BEN-JLB corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees, OPINION v. ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California,