Cases

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, vacated in part, and remanded by published opinion. Judge Motz wrote the opinion, in which Judge Wynn and Senior Judge Shedd joined. DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judge: BMG Rights Management (US) LLC (“BMG”), which owns copyrights in musical compositions, filed' this suit alleging copyri

TYSON, Judge. *231 Cheryl Christine Poage appeals the trial court's order granting summary judgment to Ira and Gail Cox ("the Coxes") and Schoenen Pool and Spa, LLC, ("Schoenen"). We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

OPINION AND ORDER RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge: . Plaintiff Keith Thomas Cox, proceeding pro se, brings this Section 1983 action against Defendants Brian Fischer, former Commissioner of the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervsion (“DOCCS”), DOCCS Senior Parole Officer Murphy, Parole Officer Campbell, and Edgecombe Residential Treatment Facility Correction Off

KEITH, J., delivered the opinion of the court in which BATCHELDER and SUTTON, JJ., joined. SUTTON, J. (pp. 492-95), delivered a separate concurring opinion. OPINION DAMON J. KEITH, Circuit Judge. Defendant Jeffrey Duane Cox (“Cox”) was convicted of seven counts of Sexual Exploitation of a Child and/or Attempted Sexual Exploita

12/21/2017 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE April 26, 2017 Session MARLON DUANE KISER v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Hamilton County No. 274423 Don W. Poole, Judge ___________________________________

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 19–1740 Filed February 14, 2020 IOWA SUPREME COURT ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD, Complainant, vs. DUANE J. GOEDKEN, Respondent. On review of the report of the Iowa Supreme Court Grievance Commission. In an attorney disciplinary action, the grievance commission recommends suspension for multiple violations of ethical rules. LICENSE SUSPENDED. Tara van

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Dec 31 2018, 9:44 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK the defense of res judicata, collateral Indiana Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 19–1740 Filed February 14, 2020 IOWA SUPREME COURT ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD, Complainant, vs. DUANE J. GOEDKEN, Respondent. On review of the report of the Iowa Supreme Court Grievance Commission. In an attorney disciplinary action, the grievance commission recommends suspension for multiple violations of ethical rules. LICENSE SUSPENDED. Tara van

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 09-1-00055-9, Frederick W. Fleming, J., entered January 22,2010. Affirmed by unpublished opinion per Cox, J., concurred in by Dwyer, C.J., and Grosse, J.

./ I-;:. LJ 0 This document contains some pages that are of poor quality at the time of imaging. RECEIVED IN 0 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS NOV 30 2Ui5 n THE STATE OF TEXAS

The opinion of the court was delivered by Nuss, C.J.: Duane Wahl appeals from a Court of Appeals decision affirming the district court’s summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief under K.S.A. 60-1507. The lower courts relied on different rationales, but both concluded that procedural bars required summary denial. We hol

709 N.W.2d 152 (2005) 268 Mich. App. 440 PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jeffery Duane COX, Defendant-Appellant. Docket No. 250773. Court of Appeals of Michigan. Submitted August 3, 2005, at Lansing. Decided October 18, 2005, at 9:05 a.m. Released for Publication January 6, 2006.

MICHAEL A. WOLFF, Judge, dissenting. This is a close case and I appreciate the principal opinion’s attempt to clarify the law as to what it means to operate a vehicle. But, on balance, I agree with Judge White’s analysis. No one wants a person in Cox’s condition to drive. That means it should be lawful for him to get in his car, run the engine for heat or air-conditioning, and stay put. The

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Jan 30 2020, 9:51 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK Indiana Supreme Court the defense of res judicata, collateral Court

Per Curiam. {¶ 1} In 1996, a client retained respondent, Duane E. Cox of Cleveland, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0002250, to represent him for claims arising out of an automobile accident. In 1997, after the client rejected a settlement offer by the defendant’s insurance company, respondent filed a complaint on behalf of the client in the Cleveland Municipal Court. {¶ 2} In 1998, following the filing o

587 F.3d 8 (2009) JIA DUAN DONG, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. No. 08-2083. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Submitted May 7, 2009. Decided November 6, 2009. *9 Theodore N. Cox on brief for petitioner. Manuel A. Palau, Trial Attorney, Office of Immigration

BEAM, Circuit Judge. Manuel de Llano (“de Llano”), formerly an employee of North Dakota State University (“NDSU”), filed this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit against several NDSU administrators (collectively, the defendants), alleging that his termination as a tenured physics professor violated his First Amendment and procedural due process rights. The district court

97 Cal.Rptr.2d 647 (2000) 23 Cal.4th 665 2 P.3d 1189 The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Julius Lamar COX, Defendant and Appellant. In re Julius Lamar Cox on Habeas Corpus. No. S070959. Supreme Court of California. July 10, 2000. As Modified on Denial of Rehearing August 9, 2000.

MEMORANDUM OPINION STARK, United States District Judge: Pending before the Court are motions to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction filed by Defendants Bright House Networks, LLC (“BHN”) and Cox Communications, Inc. (“Cox”).1 (C.A. No. 16-693 D.I. 20; C.A. No. 16-695 D.I. 19)2 For the reasons below, the Court will grant both motions.

285 F.Supp.2d 936 (2003) ROOFERS LOCAL 149 SECURITY TRUST FUND, Roofers Local 149 Pension Fund, Roofers Local 149 Vacation-Holiday Fund, Roofing Industry Promotion Fund, and Roofers Local 149 Joint Apprenticeship Fund, Plaintiffs, v. DUANE SMELSER ROOFING COMPANY, David Smelser, Stacey Smelser, and David Smelser Roofing Company, Inc., Defendants. No. CIV.01-40252. United States District Court, E.D. Mic