Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Dry Creek Construction, LLC”
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN JUDGMENT RENDERED MARCH 31, 2023 NO. 03-21-00204-CV Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and Vulcan Construction Materials LLC, Appellants v. Friends of Dry Comal Creek, Stop 3009 Vulcan Quarry, Jeffrey Reeh, Terry Olson, Mike Olson, and Comal Indepen
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN JUDGMENT RENDERED SEPTEMBER 29, 2022 NO. 03-21-00204-CV Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and Vulcan Construction Materials LLC, Appellants v. Friends of Dry Comal Creek, Stop 3009 Vulcan Quarry, Jeffrey Reeh, Terry Olson, Mike Olson, and Comal Independent
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-21-00204-CV Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and Vulcan Construction Materials LLC, Appellants v. Friends of Dry Comal Creek, Stop 3009 Vulcan Quarry, Jeffrey Reeh, Terry Olson, Mike Olson, and Comal Independent School District, Appellees FROM THE 353RD
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-21-00204-CV Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and Vulcan Construction Materials LLC, Appellants v. Friends of Dry Comal Creek, Stop 3009 Vulcan Quarry, Jeffrey Reeh, Terry Olson, Mike Olson, and Comal Independent School District, Appellees FROM THE 353RD DISTRICT
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-21-00204-CV Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and Vulcan Construction Materials LLC, Appellants v. Friends of Dry Comal Creek, Stop 3009 Vulcan Quarry, Jeffrey Reeh, Terry Olson, Mike Olson, and Comal Independent School District, Appellees FROM THE 353RD DISTRICT
BES Construction, LLCpublic domain
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of - ) ) BES Construction, LLC ) ASBCA No. 62175 ) Under Contract No. FA4418-12-C-0023 ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Todd A. Jones, Esq. Raleigh, NC
Clallam County v. Dry Creek Coalitionpublic domain
Quinn-Brintnall, J. ¶1 — In 2007, after completing a required Growth Management Act1 (GMA) review, Clallam County (County) adopted Resolution No. 77 providing that its comprehensive plan (Plan) and urban growth areas (UGA) remained compliant with the GMA and needed no amendments. Futurewise appealed to the Western Washington Growth Management Hearings Board (Growth Board).2
217 P.3d 1282 (2009) DRY CREEK PARTNERS, LLC, an Idaho Limited Liability Company, Plaintiff-Appellants, v. ADA COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, ex rel. STATE of Idaho, and John Does I through X, Defendants-Respondents. No. 35641. Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, August 2009 Term. October 2, 2009. *1284 Mimura Law Offices, PLLC, Meridian, for
Clallam County v. Dry Creek Coalitionpublic domain
255 P.3d 709 (2011) 161 Wash.App. 366 CLALLAM COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, Respondent, v. DRY CREEK COALITION, a Washington nonprofit corporation; and Futurewise, a Washington nonprofit corporation, Appellants, Western Washington Growth Management Hearings Board, an administrative agency, Respondent. No. 39601-7-II. Court of Appeals of Washingt
Casey Voigt v. Coyote Creek Mining Co., LLCpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 18-2705 ___________________________ Casey Voigt; Julie Voigt lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiffs - Appellants v. Coyote Creek Mining Company, LLC, a North Dakota Corporation lllll
Casey Voigt v. Coyote Creek Mining Co., LLCpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 18-2705 ___________________________ Casey Voigt; Julie Voigt lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiffs - Appellants v. Coyote Creek Mining Company, LLC, a North Dakota Corporation
Jones Creek Investors, LLC v. Columbia Countypublic domain
*1282 ORDER LISA GODBEY WOOD, Chief Judge. Plaintiff Jones Creek Investors alleges that activities occurring upstream from its pond, Willow Lake, have inundated Willow Lake with sediment, which in turn causes the golf course it operates to become flooded with murky water every time it rains. While Jones Creek Investors initially broug
HOWARD W. BRILL, Chief Justice liThe Illinois Bayou begins on the south slopes of the Ozarks in the Boston Mountains. Its four forks merge and provide Class II/III whitewater canoeing. On its downstream route through Pope County, it passes near the communities of Hector, Scottsville, and Dover before joining Lake Dardarielle in the Arkansas River. Although ideal for canoeing and bass fishing, the wate
Thomas Creek Lumber v. Dept. of Forestrypublic domain
No. 503 September 27, 2023 309 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON THOMAS CREEK LUMBER AND LOG CO., an Oregon corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF OREGON, Oregon Department of Forestry, Defendant-Respondent. Marion County Circuit Court 15CV32928; A167397 Audrey J. Broyles, Judge.
Power Dry of Chicago, Inc. v. Beanpublic domain
2022 IL App (2d) 210043 No. 2-21-0043 Opinion filed February 28, 2022 ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS SECOND DISTRICT ______________________________________________________________________________ POWER DRY OF CHICAGO, INC.
Patterson v. T. L. Wallace Construction, Inc.public domain
*327 ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI KING, Justice, for the Court: ¶ 1. Carl Patterson Jr. sustained serious injuries in a single-vehicle motorcycle accident. He sued T. L. Wallace Construction, Inc. (T. L. Wallace) and Turtle Creek Development, Inc. (Turtle Creek) for damages. T. L. Wallace and Turtle Creek both filed motions for summary judgment. The
Thomas Creek Lumber v. Dept. of Forestrypublic domain
309 Argued and submitted March 1, affirmed September 27, 2023 THOMAS CREEK LUMBER AND LOG CO., an Oregon corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF OREGON, Oregon Department of Forestry, Defendant-Respondent. Marion County Circuit Court 15CV32928; A167397
Voigt v. Coyote Creek Mining Co.public domain
Charles S. Miller, Jr., Magistrate Judge Before the court are two motions. One is defendant's motion for summary judgment of dismissal, which is supported by amicus briefs from the State of North Dakota and the Lignite Energy Council ("LEC").1 The other is plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment as to certain issues of liability. The court previously denied defendant's motion to
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE KEVIN COOK AND NICHOLE COOK ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2021-0522-SG ) DEEP HOLE CREEK ASSOCIATES, a ) Delaware partnership, DEEP HOLE ) CREEK ASSOCIATES, INC., a ) Delaware corporation, LAURENCE L. ) BURKE and SUZANNE T. WAT
Opinion FYBEL, J.— INTRODUCTION Navigators Specialty Insurance Company (Navigators) issued commercial general liability (CGL) insurance policies (the Policies) to Moorefield Construction, Inc. (Moorefield), a licensed general contractor. In this appeal, we address the meaning, scope, and application of two standard provisions of