Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Doyle v. United States”
Doyle v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 22-499 Filed: March 24, 2023 JAMES DOYLE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. Roger J. Marzulla and Nancie G. Marzulla, Marzulla Law, LLC, Washington, D.C., for Plaintiffs. Paul G. Freeborne and Elizabeth McGurk, Trial Attorneys, Todd Kim, Assistant Attorney General, Environmen
Doyle v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Doyle v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Doyle v. United Statespublic domain
Fifth Amendment Takings, Breach of Contract, Ripe Claims, Statute of Limitations OPINION FIRESTONE, Senior Judge. Pending before the court is a motion filed by defendant the United States (“the government”) to dismiss the above-captioned case pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”) for lack o
Doyle v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 7th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Doyle v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Doyle v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Doyle v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied. Same case below, 438 Fed. Appx. 288.
Doyle v. United Statespublic domain
(Reported below: 678 F. 3d 429); (483 Fed. Appx. 998); (487 Fed. Appx. 953); (478 Fed. Appx. 321); (472 Fed. Appx. 401); (481 Fed. Appx. 250). C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Doyle v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER GEORGE W. MILLER, Judge. On January 5, 2009, plaintiff Cynthia D. Doyle, appearing pro se, filed her Complaint (docket entry 1) (“Compl.”) seeking a credit or offset from the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) for overpayment of federal taxes for the 2002 taxable year. Defendant filed a motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to
Doyle v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 7th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Doyle v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 7th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Doyle v. United Statespublic domain
538 U.S. 955 DOYLEv.UNITED STATES. No. 02-9219. Supreme Court of United States. March 31, 2003. 1 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. 2 C. A.
Doyle v. United Statespublic domain
541 U.S. 951 DOYLEv.UNITED STATES. No. 03-8783. Supreme Court of United States. March 22, 2004. 1 C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Doyle v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 7th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Doyle v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 7th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
United States v. Doylepublic domain
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before GASTON, STEPHENS, and HOUTZ Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Jason S. DOYLE Lieutenant Commander (O-4), U.S. Navy
Doyle v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Doyle v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Doyle v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.