Cases

106 B.R. 272 (1989) In re Donald Wayne DOYLE, Debtor. Donald Wayne DOYLE, Plaintiff, v. HIGHER EDUCATION ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT of EDUCATION, and Bank IV Wichita, N.A., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 88-09011, Adv. No. 88-0934. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama. October 4, 1989. Amy A. Slayden, Huntsville, Ala., for plaintiff. Richa

Appellate Case: 22-3286 Document: 105-1 Date Filed: 11/12/2024 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS November 12, 2024

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE EDWARD SCOT HUSBANDS § § No. 349, 2019 Appellant Below, § Appellant § Court Below: Superior Court § of the State of Delaware v. § § C.A. No.: N18A-0

OPINION AND ORDER CAMILLE L. VELEZ-RIVE, United States Magistrate Judge. INTRODUCTION The present case is yet another in a long line of cases that swamp the federal docket every four (4) years following gubernatorial elections held in Puerto Rico, where the incumbent party is defeated. Plaintiffs are four (4) career employees of the Puerto Rico Department of Education, Josefina Arroyo

476 F.Supp.2d 1356 (2007) Anthony T. LEE, et al., Plaintiffs, United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor and Amicus Curiae, National Education Association, Inc., Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. LEE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, Russell County Board of Education, Tallapoosa County Board of Education, Alexander City Board of Education, Auburn City Board of Education, Opelika City Board of Education, Phenix City Board of Education, Roanoke City Bo

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 22-499 Filed: March 24, 2023 JAMES DOYLE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. Roger J. Marzulla and Nancie G. Marzulla, Marzulla Law, LLC, Washington, D.C., for Plaintiffs. Paul G. Freeborne and Elizabeth McGurk, Trial Attorneys, Todd Kim, Assistant Attorney General, Environmen

OPINION SIMANDLE, Chief Judge: I. INTRODUCTION This matter comes before the Court on the motion of Defendants the New Jersey Department of Education and Peter Shul-man (“Department of Education” and “Shulman”) to dismiss [Docket Item 6] Plaintiff Anthony Wright’s Complaint alleging gender, race, and age discrimination [Docket Item 1]. Plaintiff, an employee at the Department of Education

Opinion filed March 9, 2023 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-21-00046-CR __________ TOMMY DOYLE CHAMBLISS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 32nd District Court Nolan County, Texa

OPINION OF THE COURT Alice Schlesinger, J. This CPLR article 78 proceeding presents the challenging issue of determining the precise reach of the decision by the Court of Appeals in Matter of Frasier v Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of N.Y. (71 NY2d 763 [1988]). Other significant issues are also raised. The predicate facts are as follows. Petitioner Leslie Kahn be

Jack B. Weinstein, Senior United States District Judge: Table of Contents I. Introduction...298 II. Claims...298 III. Background...299 A. Challenged Rule...299 B. Factual Allegations...300 IV. Motion to Dismiss Standard...301 V. Analysis...301

DISSENTING STATEMENT BY LIU, J. Petitioner David Buckley Doyle was convicted of vehicular manslaughter, driving under the influence of alcohol and drugs causing great bodily injury, and fleeing the scene of an accident involving great bodily injury or death. He was sentenced to 11 years in prison. His sole claim on appeal is that he was not fully advised of his constitutional right to a jury trial before waiving that right and proce

Filed 11/10/16 (review dismissed 1/31/18; reposted with Supreme Court order and statement) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, E064557 v. (Super.Ct.No. INF1

41 A.3d 222 (2012) The SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA, Petitioner v. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Respondent. Walter D. Palmer Leadership Learning Partners Charter School, Petitioner v. Department of Education, Respondent. Nos. 360 C.D. 2011, 498 C.D. 2011 Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Argued February 15, 2012. Decided April 3, 2012.

OPINION AND ORDER JESSE M. FURMAN, District Judge: This case presents a question that appears to be of first impression: whether someone who performs community service as a condition of an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal (“ACD”) of criminal charges qualifies as an “employee” for purposes of the Fair Labor Standards Act (the “FLSA” or “Act”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. Plaintiffs

08/25/2020 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE February 25, 2020 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. DOYLE WAYNE MASON, JR. Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No. 109267 Steven W. Sword, Judge No. E2019-00174-CCA-R3-CD The De

DUNCAN, J. This case involves four plaintiffs, each of whom retired from employment with the City of Medford (the city) and each of whom attempted to elect to continue the health insurance coverage that the city had provided to them as employees. But the city’s health insurance plan that applied to plaintiffs at the time of their retirement did not provide coverage for retirees. Although plaintiffs each had the option to enrol

MILLER J. *948While driving under the influence of alcohol and drugs, defendant and appellant *625David Buckley Doyle swerved into oncoming traffic and hit Mark Joseph Norton (the victim) who was riding a motor scooter. The victim died immediately. Defendant drove a

Boggs, Judge. On May 16, 2011, the Supreme Court of Georgia held the 2008 Georgia Charter Schools Commission Act, OCGA § 20-2-2080 et seq., unconstitutional because it violated the “special schools” provision of the Georgia Constitution, Ga. Const. of 1983, Art. VIII, Sec. V, Par. VII (a). Gwinnett County School Dist. v. Cox, 289 Ga. 265 (710 SE2d 773) *692(2

675 F.3d 187 (2012) SECRETARY OF LABOR, Appellant v. James DOYLE; Cynthia Holloway; Michael Garnett; Mark MacCariella; PITWU Health and Welfare; Tim Foster; Freedman & Lorry; Dante Georeno; Neil S. Goldstein, Esq.; Franklin Militello; The Mckeough Company; Union Privilege Care, Inc.; David Weinstein. No. 10-3598. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued April 2

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel.  JON H. OBERG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KENTUCKY HIGHER EDUCATION STUDENT LOAN CORPORATION; PENNSYLVANIA HIGHER EDUCATION ASSISTANCE AGENCY; VERMONT STUDENT ASSISTANCE CORPORATION; ARKANSAS STUDENT LOAN AUTHORITY, Defendants-Appellees, and NELNET, INC.; SLM CORPORATION;  No. 10-2320 PANHAN