Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Dowling v. Schumacher”
Eric Schumacher v. City of Roswellpublic domain
Barnes, Presiding Judge. Eric Schumacher and Mike Nyden are property owners in the City of Roswell who brought this lawsuit challenging the City's adoption of a new zoning ordinance called the Unified Development Code (the "Code") on procedural due process and other grounds. The trial court granted the City's motion for judgment on the pleadings and dismissed all of the plaintiffs' clai
Levberg v. Schumacherpublic domain
Dowling, J.: Plaintiff, a blacksmith, was employed by defendant, a wagonmaker, and in the course of his duties was required to put iron tires on wheels. This was done by taking the heated tires out of the fire, placing them on the wheel, throwing several pails of water thereupon, passing a bar in the wheel, and then raising and carrying it to a receptacle in the floor of the shop, at either side of which were posts with projec
Schumacher v. Schumacherpublic domain
Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present — Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Smith, Page and Greenbaum, JJ.
Schumacher v. O'Malleypublic domain
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Smith, Merrell and Greenbaum, JJ.
Schumacher v. Bomeislerpublic domain
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Scott, Dowling and Smith, JJ.
Levberg v. Schumacherpublic domain
Motion granted. Present—Clarke, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Smith, JJ.
Levberg v. Schumacherpublic domain
—Application granted. Order signed. Present—Clarke, P. J., McLaughlin, Dowling, Smith and Davis, JJ.
Schumacher v. O'Malleypublic domain
Motion for stay granted. Settle order on notice. Present — Dowling, Laughlin, Smith, Merrell and Greenbaum, JJ.
Schumacher v. the Sumner Tele. Co.public domain
Corporations: NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS: INDIVIDUAL LIABILITY: 1 BURDEN OF PROOF. The statute providing for individual liability of incorporators, because of failure to substantially comply with the statutory requirements regarding incorporation, does not apply to parties who, without attempting to incorporate or without assuming any corporate functions, adopt a trade name calling themselves a company; and in a suit upon a note executed in the name of the co
Florida East Coast Railroad v. Schumacherpublic domain
Per Curiam. — In an action for personal injuries to the wife caused by the running of a railroad train the verdict and judgment awarded $800.00, .to the husband for expenses incurred on account of the injury to the wife and' also $8200.00, to the wife. It is conceded that the latter amount included punitive damages, and this is as signed and urged as error. The statute authorizes the recovery of compensation “for a
Pinto v. Pintopublic domain
Pinto v Pinto (2022 NY Slip Op 05728) Pinto v Pinto 2022 NY Slip Op 05728 Decided on October 12, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
U.S. Bank N.A. v. Rauffpublic domain
U.S. Bank N.A. v Rauff (2022 NY Slip Op 03269) U.S. Bank N.A. v Rauff 2022 NY Slip Op 03269 Decided on May 18, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judi
U.S. Bank N.A. v. Henrypublic domain
U.S. Bank N.A. v Henry (2023 NY Slip Op 04391) U.S. Bank N.A. v Henry 2023 NY Slip Op 04391 Decided on August 23, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.</
Rattner v. Fesslerpublic domain
Rattner v Fessler (2022 NY Slip Op 01058) Rattner v Fessler 2022 NY Slip Op 01058 Decided on February 16, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary
Transcan Sys., Inc. v. Seldat Distrib., Inc.public domain
Transcan Sys., Inc. v Seldat Distrib., Inc. (2022 NY Slip Op 05881) Transcan Sys., Inc. v Seldat Distrib., Inc. 2022 NY Slip Op 05881 Decided on October 19, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reportin
United States v. Domingopublic domain
UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS WASHINGTON, D.C. Before K.J. BRUBAKER, M.C. HOLIFIELD, A.Y. MARKS Appellate Military Judges UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JOSE D. DOMINGO SENIOR CHIEF ELECTRICIAN'S MATE (E -8), U.S. NAVY NMCCA 20140
Wesley v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.public domain
EDWARD R. ARDINI, JR., JUDGE This appeal involves the validity of a real estate foreclosure sale. The Wesleys, plaintiffs below, appeal judgments entered by the Circuit Court of Jackson County granting summary judgment in favor of the defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells Fargo") and Kozeny & McCubbin, L.C. ("K&M"). Wells Fargo cross-appeals the denial of its request for attorneys' fees. For the reasons stated below, w
FOURTH DIVISION DILLARD, P. J., BROWN and PADGETT, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules September 9, 2024
Harris v. One Hope United, Inc.public domain
Illinois Official Reports Supreme Court Harris v. One Hope United, Inc., 2015 IL 117200 Caption in Supreme ROBERT F. HARRIS, Appellee, v. ONE HOPE UNITED, INC., Court: et al., Appellants. Docket No. 117200 Filed March 19, 2015 Decision Under Appeal from the Appellate Court for the First District; heard in that Review court on appeal f
Rogelio Leos v. Statepublic domain
NUMBER 13-02-241-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBUR