Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Dowling v. Broderick”
People v. Broderickpublic domain
People v Broderick (2021 NY Slip Op 05975) People v Broderick 2021 NY Slip Op 05975 Decided on November 3, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciar
Broderick v. Amber Ct. Assisted Livingpublic domain
Broderick v Amber Ct. Assisted Living (2021 NY Slip Op 06981) Broderick v Amber Ct. Assisted Living 2021 NY Slip Op 06981 Decided on December 15, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State La
Matter of Solomon v. Broderickpublic domain
Matter of Solomon v Broderick 2026 NY Slip Op 04510 July 22, 2026 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. In the Matter of Jeffrey L. Solomon, appellant, v Paul F. Broderick, etc., respondent. Supreme Court of the Stat
People ex rel. Broderick v. Goldfoglepublic domain
Dowling, J.: As the constitutionality of chapter 897 of the Laws of 1923, amending the Tax Law and known as the Moneyed Capital Tax Law, is attacked by the relators, respondents, in this and the two following cases, it is requisite that this question should be dealt with at the outset, before considering the state of facts in each particular case which is claimed to justify the imposition of the tax provided by that statute.
Broderick v. Police Commissioner of Bostonpublic domain
368 Mass. 33 (1975) 330 N.E.2d 199 CHESTER J. BRODERICK & others vs. POLICE COMMISSIONER OF BOSTON. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Suffolk. February 6, 1975. June 4, 1975. Present: TAURO, C.J., REARDON, QUIRICO, BRAUCHER, & HENNESSEY, JJ. Frank J. McGee, Jr. (Vincent A. Harrington, Jr., with him) for the
Broderick v. Crippenpublic domain
Judgment reversed on the law and facts, with costs, and judgment directed in favor of the plaintiff for the relief demanded in the complaint, with costs, on the authority of White v. Bevilacqua (273JST. Y, 282). Certain findings of fact and conclusions of law disapproved and reversed and new findings and conclusions made. All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an action to recover assessment on bank stock, the amount previously cont
Broderick v. Windolphpublic domain
Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with ten dollars costs. Present — Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Dowling, Smith and Page, JJ.
Broderick v. Raisler Sprinkler Co.public domain
Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with ten dollars costs. Present — Dowling, P. J., Finch, McAvoy, Martin and Proskauer, JJ.
People ex rel. Broderick v. Goldfoglepublic domain
Preference granted for May 26, 1925. Present — Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Merrell, MeAvoy, and Burr, JJ. [See ante, pp. 677, 702, 706, 710, 713, 715, 715, 719, respectively.]
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on Dwelle v. Allen (151 App. Div. 717). Present—Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
Miolan v. Milmar Food Group, LLCpublic domain
Miolan v Milmar Food Group, LLC (2024 NY Slip Op 03886) Miolan v Milmar Food Group, LLC 2024 NY Slip Op 03886 Decided on July 24, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judici
Miller v. Fuentespublic domain
Miller v Fuentes (2025 NY Slip Op 03564) Miller v Fuentes 2025 NY Slip Op 03564 Decided on June 11, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorre
People v. Mendezpublic domain
People v Mendez (2023 NY Slip Op 00884) People v Mendez 2023 NY Slip Op 00884 Decided on February 15, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
21st Mtge. Corp. v. Akterpublic domain
21st Mtge. Corp. v Akter (2025 NY Slip Op 00413) 21st Mtge. Corp. v Akter 2025 NY Slip Op 00413 Decided on January 29, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 4
Bank of N.Y. Mellon Corp. v. Kamalpublic domain
Bank of N.Y. Mellon Corp. v Kamal (2025 NY Slip Op 04862) Bank of N.Y. Mellon Corp. v Kamal 2025 NY Slip Op 04862 Decided on September 10, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
Nationstar Mtge., LLC v. Ghanesspublic domain
Nationstar Mtge., LLC v Ghaness (2023 NY Slip Op 02523) Nationstar Mtge., LLC v Ghaness 2023 NY Slip Op 02523 Decided on May 10, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judicia
U.S. Bank N.A. v. Logan Estates, LLCpublic domain
U.S. Bank N.A. v Logan Estates, LLC (2023 NY Slip Op 00687) U.S. Bank N.A. v Logan Estates, LLC 2023 NY Slip Op 00687 Decided on February 8, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuan
Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. O'Connorpublic domain
Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v O'Connor (2024 NY Slip Op 00406) Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v O'Connor 2024 NY Slip Op 00406 Decided on January 31, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bure
Mediavilla v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
MEMORANDUM & ORDER VERNON S. BRODERICK, United States District Judge: Jose Mediavilla, a participant in several Occupy Wall Street protests that took place in downtown Manhattan in 2011 and 2012, filed a complaint asserting that his rights were violated in connection with his arrests on November 5, 2011 and November 12, 2011 by members of the New York City Police Department. Before me is the motion for
Dittmer v. County of Suffolkpublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER THIS SUMMARY ORDER WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REPORTER AND MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENTIAL AUTHORITY TO THIS OR ANY OTHER COURT, BUT MAY BE CALLED TO THE ATTENTION OF THIS OR ANY OTHER COURT IN A SUBSEQUENT STAGE OF THIS CASE, IN A RELATED CASE, OR IN ANY CASE FOR PURPOSES OF COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL OR RES JUDICATA. At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit,