⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Dowling v. Broderick”

People v. Broderickpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021-11-03 · Published · cited 4× · 153 N.Y.S.3d 899; 199 A.D.3d 696; 2021 NY Slip Op 05975
People v Broderick (2021 NY Slip Op 05975) People v Broderick 2021 NY Slip Op 05975 Decided on November 3, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciar
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021-12-15 · Published · cited 3× · 200 A.D.3d 840; 155 N.Y.S.3d 340; 2021 NY Slip Op 06981
Broderick v Amber Ct. Assisted Living (2021 NY Slip Op 06981) Broderick v Amber Ct. Assisted Living 2021 NY Slip Op 06981 Decided on December 15, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State La
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026-07-22 · Published · cited 0× · 2026 NY Slip Op 04510
Matter of Solomon v Broderick 2026 NY Slip Op 04510 July 22, 2026 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. In the Matter of Jeffrey L. Solomon, appellant, v Paul F. Broderick, etc., respondent. Supreme Court of the Stat
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925-07-06 · Published · cited 7× · 213 A.D. 677; 211 N.Y.S. 85; 1925 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8569
Dowling, J.: As the constitutionality of chapter 897 of the Laws of 1923, amending the Tax Law and known as the Moneyed Capital Tax Law, is attacked by the relators, respondents, in this and the two following cases, it is requisite that this question should be dealt with at the outset, before considering the state of facts in each particular case which is claimed to justify the imposition of the tax provided by that statute.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975-06-04 · Published · cited 51× · 330 N.E.2d 199; 368 Mass. 33; 1975 Mass. LEXIS 963
368 Mass. 33 (1975) 330 N.E.2d 199 CHESTER J. BRODERICK & others vs. POLICE COMMISSIONER OF BOSTON. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Suffolk. February 6, 1975. June 4, 1975. Present: TAURO, C.J., REARDON, QUIRICO, BRAUCHER, & HENNESSEY, JJ. Frank J. McGee, Jr. (Vincent A. Harrington, Jr., with him) for the
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938-05-04 · Published · cited 0× · 254 A.D. 806; 5 N.Y.S.2d 511; 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7683
Judgment reversed on the law and facts, with costs, and judgment directed in favor of the plaintiff for the relief demanded in the complaint, with costs, on the authority of White v. Bevilacqua (273JST. Y, 282). Certain findings of fact and conclusions of law disapproved and reversed and new findings and conclusions made. All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an action to recover assessment on bank stock, the amount previously cont
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921-11-15 · Published · cited 0× · 199 A.D. 927
Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with ten dollars costs. Present — Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Dowling, Smith and Page, JJ.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928-10-15 · Published · cited 0× · 224 A.D. 823
Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with ten dollars costs. Present — Dowling, P. J., Finch, McAvoy, Martin and Proskauer, JJ.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925-04-15 · Published · cited 0× · 213 A.D. 864
Preference granted for May 26, 1925. Present — Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Merrell, MeAvoy, and Burr, JJ. [See ante, pp. 677, 702, 706, 710, 713, 715, 715, 719, respectively.]
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914-04-15 · Published · cited 0× · 163 A.D. 850
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on Dwelle v. Allen (151 App. Div. 717). Present—Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024-07-24 · Published · cited 0× · 2024 NY Slip Op 03886
Miolan v Milmar Food Group, LLC (2024 NY Slip Op 03886) Miolan v Milmar Food Group, LLC 2024 NY Slip Op 03886 Decided on July 24, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judici
Miller v. Fuentespublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025-06-11 · Published · cited 0× · 2025 NY Slip Op 03564
Miller v Fuentes (2025 NY Slip Op 03564) Miller v Fuentes 2025 NY Slip Op 03564 Decided on June 11, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorre
People v. Mendezpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023-02-15 · Published · cited 3× · 213 A.D.3d 868; 183 N.Y.S.3d 553; 2023 NY Slip Op 00884
People v Mendez (2023 NY Slip Op 00884) People v Mendez 2023 NY Slip Op 00884 Decided on February 15, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025-01-29 · Published · cited 0× · 2025 NY Slip Op 00413
21st Mtge. Corp. v Akter (2025 NY Slip Op 00413) 21st Mtge. Corp. v Akter 2025 NY Slip Op 00413 Decided on January 29, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 4
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025-09-10 · Published · cited 0× · 2025 NY Slip Op 04862
Bank of N.Y. Mellon Corp. v Kamal (2025 NY Slip Op 04862) Bank of N.Y. Mellon Corp. v Kamal 2025 NY Slip Op 04862 Decided on September 10, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023-05-10 · Published · cited 1× · 189 N.Y.S.3d 561; 216 A.D.3d 791; 2023 NY Slip Op 02523
Nationstar Mtge., LLC v Ghaness (2023 NY Slip Op 02523) Nationstar Mtge., LLC v Ghaness 2023 NY Slip Op 02523 Decided on May 10, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judicia
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023-02-08 · Published · cited 2× · 213 A.D.3d 792; 184 N.Y.S.3d 87; 2023 NY Slip Op 00687
U.S. Bank N.A. v Logan Estates, LLC (2023 NY Slip Op 00687) U.S. Bank N.A. v Logan Estates, LLC 2023 NY Slip Op 00687 Decided on February 8, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuan
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024-01-31 · Published · cited 0× · 2024 NY Slip Op 00406
Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v O'Connor (2024 NY Slip Op 00406) Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v O'Connor 2024 NY Slip Op 00406 Decided on January 31, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bure
District Court, S.D. New York · 2016-09-29 · Published · cited 21× · 259 F. Supp. 3d 82
MEMORANDUM & ORDER VERNON S. BRODERICK, United States District Judge: Jose Mediavilla, a participant in several Occupy Wall Street protests that took place in downtown Manhattan in 2011 and 2012, filed a complaint asserting that his rights were violated in connection with his arrests on November 5, 2011 and November 12, 2011 by members of the New York City Police Department. Before me is the motion for
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003-02-28 · Published · cited 1× · 59 F. App'x 375
SUMMARY ORDER THIS SUMMARY ORDER WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REPORTER AND MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENTIAL AUTHORITY TO THIS OR ANY OTHER COURT, BUT MAY BE CALLED TO THE ATTENTION OF THIS OR ANY OTHER COURT IN A SUBSEQUENT STAGE OF THIS CASE, IN A RELATED CASE, OR IN ANY CASE FOR PURPOSES OF COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL OR RES JUDICATA. At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit,