Cases

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Dowdy v. Singletary, 704 So.2d 1052 (Fla.1998). MICKLE, LAWRENCE and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

10/01/2025 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 12, 2025 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JAMES ANDREW DIDOMENICO Appeal from the Circuit Court for Williamson County No. W-CR220446 Joseph A. Woodruff, Judge ___________________________________

WINDOM, Presiding Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I agree with the majority’s opinion with one exception. I do not agree with the majority’s decision to remand this cause with instructions for the circuit court to conduct further proceedings on Yeomans’s claim that Juror L.J. failed to disclose during voir dire that her sister had been the victim of a crime.

BAKER, Judge. - ■ [1] Carl Summerhill sued Craig Klauer for negligence following a collision between Summerhill’s moped and Klauer’s motorcycle. Following trial, a jury declined to find Klauer liable. Summerhill now appeals that judgment, arguing that the trial court erred in excluding certain evidence and that he was prejudiced as a result. We agree with Summerhill that' the tria

Classification/Desc Year Corpus Source or Source Type Excerpt of Concordance Line Contextual summary ription As we said in both Benoit and Ros

KING, Chief Judge: After a jury trial, Defendant-Appellant Steve Caldwell was convicted of three counts of mail fraud and one count of money laundering. On appeal he challenges his convictions and sentence on several grounds. Finding no reversible error, we AFFIRM Caldwell’s conviction and sentence. I. BACKGROUND On November 4, 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. HUNTER SEEFRIED, Case No. 21-cr-287 (TNM) Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Did the electoral certification on January 6, 2021 involve the “administration of justice”? The answer determines whether significant sentencing enh

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A13-1245 Court of Appeals Gildea, C.J. Dissenting, Page and Stras, JJ. State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Filed: February 11, 2015

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 06-3713 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MARK A. SAMUELS, Defendant-Appellant. ____________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of

687 N.W.2d 342 (2004) 263 Mich. App. 42 PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Theron Mark MATUSZAK, Defendant-Appellant. Docket No. 244817. Court of Appeals of Michigan. Submitted February 10, 2004, at Detroit. Decided July 13, 2004, at 9:00 a.m. Released for Publication September 29, 2004.

Filed 12/2/25; nonpub opn filed 11/4/25 vacated CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN THE PEOPLE, B336625 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BA143017) v. KENNETH DOZIER, D

HILL, Justice. [T1] Appellants, Michael Hannifan (Han-nifan) and Kevin Hampleman (Hampleman) (collectively Appellants) contend that they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law.1 because there is insufficient evidence that either of them acted "intentionally" to harm the Appellees, Leslie Roy "Les" Butts (Butts), or Davis Butts and Dawson Butts, the minor children of Butts (hereafter "Children"

470 F.Supp.2d 554 (2007) UNITED STATES of America v. William ATWELL. No. 06-651-SKG. United States District Court, D. Maryland. January 5, 2007. *555 *556 *557 *558 William C. Atwell, III, Odenton, MD, pro se. Leo

787 A.2d 152 (2001) 367 Md. 348 Robert Allen SMITH v. STATE of Maryland. No. 64, Sept. Term, 2000. Court of Appeals of Maryland. December 20, 2001. *153 Nancy S. Forster, Asst. Public Defender (Stephen E. Harris, Public Defender, on brief), Baltimore, for petitioner. M. Jennifer Landis, Asst. Atty.

144 B.R. 121 (1992) In re S & D FOODS, INC., formerly known as Consolidated Pet Foods, Inc., a/k/a Consolidated Pet Food, Inc., North American Trading Co., Debtor. Larry A. LARSEN, Plaintiff, v. CONSOLIDATED PET FOODS, INC., a/k/a Consolidated Pet Food, Inc., North American Trading Company, Donald A. Kunkel, Susan L. Kunkel, FBS Business Finance Corporation, United Protein, Inc., Marks and Clare, Escrow Agents, and City of Dodge City, Kan

OPINION OF THE COURT BECKER, Circuit Judge. This case presents the question whether the Territorial Court of the Virgin Islands erred in considering a spouse’s responsibility for the failure of a marriage in the distribution of the marital homestead pursuant to V.I.Code Ann. tit. 33 § 2305(d) (1967 & Supp.1985). For the reasons that follow, we concl

551 So.2d 132 (1989) James T. JACKSON v. STATE of Mississippi. No. 57904. Supreme Court of Mississippi. July 6, 1989. Rehearing Denied September 20, 1989. *134 Jim Kitchens, Constance L. Johnson, Dowdy, Kitchens, Whittington & Burkhalter, Jackson, for appellant. Mike Moore, Atty. Gen. by DeWitt Allred,

The indictment is as follows: "The grand jury of said county charge that, before the finding of this indictment, Daniel W. Fuller with intent to injure or defraud, did falsely make, alter, forge or counterfeit an instrument in writing, in words and figures substantially as follows: Date Clerk Dept No 14 01 500 Charge to William Samuel Wyatt, Jr. Street R.F.D. 3 Box 475 A 1

SANDERS, Justice. The Grand Jury of St. Martin Parish indicted Russell Alexander for the murder of Mrs. Aline Bulliard Carter. Upon arraignment, he pleaded not guilty and the court fixed a time for filing pleas and motions. The defendant filed motions to quash the indictment and for a change of venue, based upon the allegation that widespread prejudice existed against him in St. Martin Parish. After hearing, the trial judge

This appeal is from a default judgment entered against appellant, Golden Arrow Mines, Inc., on an amended cross-complaint. The amended cross-complaint was filed and summons issued thereon was served on appellant, Golden Arrow Mines, Inc., which will hereinafter be referred to as the Mining Company. The cross-plaintiffs sought to quiet their title, against the Mining Company, to certain mining property situated in Blaine county. The question here involved is the sufficiency of the amended cros