Cases

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DOUGLAS P. CHAPPELL, Defendant-Appellant,  No. 10-4746 v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Intervenor.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alex

ACCEPTED 05-15-01513-CV 05-15-01513-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 12/11/2015 4:54:22 PM

208 B.R. 709 (1997) In re ROCKY MOUNTAIN REFRACTORIES, doing business as RMR, Inc., doing business as Faux Cerara, Debtor. Stephen W. RUPP, Trustee of the Chapter 7 bankruptcy estate of Rocky Mountain Refractories, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, through its agency INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE; Utah State Tax Commission; Salt Lake County Assessor; Utah Department of Employment Security; and Jerry W. Brailsford, Appellees.

MEMORANDUM ** Mark Cardwell and his wife, Marti Jo Cardwell (hereafter referred to collectively as “Cardwell”) appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment in defendants’ favor in this action alleging age discrimination in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”) and the Arizona Civil Rights Act (“ACRA”), and further alleging retaliation, intentional interference with contrac

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed September 10, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D23-880 Lower Tribunal No. 04-11813 ________________ Steve Ferguson, Appellant,

761 F.Supp.2d 54 (2011) Enio R. RIVERA, Michael Talton, Plaintiffs, v. ROCHESTER GENESEE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, Defendant. No. 07-CV-6483L. United States District Court, W.D. New York. January 26, 2011. *56 Christina A. Agola, Rochester, NY, for Plaintiffs. Daniel J. Moore, Roy R. Galewski, Joshua D. Steele, Ky

ORDER Third-Party Defendant Copart’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 48) Third-Party Plaintiff American Family’s Counter-Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 55) Defendant American Family’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs’ Claims (ECF No. 56) RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION

NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. DATE: 07/16/2024 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 15:10:52 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE

259 P.3d 1049 (2011) 2011 UT 44 Andrew T. ALLEN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Melissa MOYER, Defendant and Appellee. No. 20090841. Supreme Court of Utah. July 29, 2011. Daniel L. Wilson, Scott G. Nance, Ogden, for plaintiff. Kent R. Holmberg, Salt Lake City, for defendant. *1050 Associate Chie

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed November 5, 2025. ________________ No. 3D23-880 Lower Tribunal No. 04-11813 ________________ Steve Ferguson, Appellant, vs. The Republic of Trinidad and Tobago, et al.,

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 16-CV-1135 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, APPELLANT, V. JANET BRYANT, ∗ PERSONAL

94 F.3d 65 PRESIDENTIAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee,TLC Beatrice International Holdings, Inc., Movant-Appellant,v.Michael R. MILKEN; Roy Abbott; Paul Abecassis; JackAckerman; Peter Ackerman; Joseph P. Adams; StevenAndreder; Joel Asen; Andrew Astrachan; Mark Attanasio;Eileen Austen; Herbert Bachelor; Stanley Bailowitz;Jeffrey Balash; Donald Balser; Dan Bathon; Jeffrey P.Beck; Joseph Benci

520 F.Supp.2d 238 (2007) NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS OF THE MID-ATLANTIC, INC. d/b/a Nextel Communications, Plaintiff, v. The TOWN OF BROOKLINE, MASSACHUSETTS, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 06-11251-NG. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. September 28, 2007. *239 *240 Danielle L.

127 F.Supp.2d 801 (2001) Derosher E. PRICE v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION No. CIV. A. G-99-675. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Galveston Division. January 12, 2001. *802 Ted C Litton, Royston Rayzor Vickery and Williams, Houston, TX, for mediator. Gregg M Rosenberg, Gregg M Rosenberg & Associates, Houston, T

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge. On April 9, 2014, the Government filed a 78-count criminal indictment against the Defendant William Scully, also known as “Liam Scully” (“Scully” or “the Defendant”), and codefendant Shahrad Rodi La-meh (“Lameh”)(collectively “the Defendants”). The Government charged the Defendants, as owners and operators of Pharma-logical, Inc. d/b/

738 F.Supp.2d 817 (2010) Gerian Steven MOORE and George Providence II, Plaintiff, v. Dr. Wayne WATSON, President, and Erma Brooks Williams, Associate to President for Communications and External Relations, in their official capacities, Defendants. No. 09 C 701. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. September 7, 2010.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER YOUNG, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION The named End-Payor plaintiffs seek class certification of a class comprised of individual consumers, third-party payors (“TPPs”), union plan sponsors, and insurance companies that purchased or provided reimbursements for Nexium in those states that permit such an action. See Corrected Con-sol. Am. Class Ac

340 F.Supp.2d 415 (2004) Louis Vuitton MALLETIER, Plaintiff, v. DOONEY & BOURKE, INC., Defendant. No. 04 Civ. 2990(SAS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. August 27, 2004. *419 Theodore C. Max, Kevin N. Ainsworth, Charles A. LeGrand, Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo P.C., New York, New York, Howard J. Suss

MOORE, Chief Justice (concurring specially). On June 26, 2015, by a bare 5-4 majority, the United States Supreme Court declared that all states must now recognize a fundamental right to “same-sex marriage.” Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. —, 135 S.Ct. 2584, 192 L.Ed.2d 609 (2015). Because the Alabama Supreme Court had previously issued orders in this case directing the probate judges of this State no

Case: 23-50224 Document: 337-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/23/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED May 23, 2025 No. 23