Cases

The Full Commission has reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based on the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Douglas E. Berger and the briefs and oral argument on appeal. The appealing party has not shown good ground to reconsider the evidence, to receive further evidence or to amend the prior Opinion and Award, which is therefore Affirmed. In this matter, the parties were given fifteen days from the filing date of Deputy Commissioner Berger's Interlocutory Opinion an

162 F.Supp.2d 1262 (2001) James R. MILLSAP, et al. Plaintiffs, v. MCDONNELL DOUGLAS CORPORATION, a foreign corporation, Defendant. No. 94CV633. United States District Court, N.D. Oklahoma. September 5, 2001. *1263 Joseph R. Farris, James David Mustain, Tony Michael Graham, Feldman, Franden, Woodward, Farris & Taylor, Tulsa, O

LUCERO, J., Circuit Judge, dissenting. Under the majority’s result, the class plaintiffs are entitled to neither reinstatement nor back pay. Not only does the majority’s holding fail to deter ERISA violations, it also encourages employers who violate ERISA to delay proceedings as long as possible, “lead[ing] to the strange result that .... the most egregious offenders could be subject to the least sanctions.”

PER CURIAM. We reverse and remand for the entry of separate commitment orders, one for each offense, see A.F. v. State, 718 So.2d 260 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), and direct that the commitment order for the offense of battery must not exceed one year, see M.J.P. v. State, — So.2d -, 22 Fla.L. Weekly D2090, 1997 WL 536011 (Fla. 1st DCA Sept.3, 1997), approved 717 So.2d 459 (Fla.1998); C.P. v. State,

BRIAN MILLSAP V. SHOW TRUCKS USA, INC. NO. 07-05-0387-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL D APRIL 25, 2006 ______________________________ DOUGLAS D. COX,

BRIAN MILLSAP V. SHOW TRUCKS USA, INC. NO. 07-05-0387-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL D APRIL 25, 2006 ______________________________ DOU

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 17-1101 Filed October 11, 2017 IN THE INTEREST OF J.H., K.H., and K.A., Minor Children, J.L., Father of K.A., Appellant, A.A., Mother, Appellant, K.H., Father of J.H. and K.H., Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Wright County, Paul B. Ahlers, District Associate

OPINION DROWOTA Justice. In this case involving the commercial speech doctrines of the First Amendment, the Tennessee State Board of Dentistry (Board) appeals from the Court of Appeals’ judgment vacating the public reprimand issued by the Board to J. Lee Douglas, a licensed dentist, for violation of the Board’s advertising rules. This case presents the following issue: whether the Board may require Dougla

164 S.W.3d 555 (2005) Kavita Vicky TARNEJA, Respondent, v. Kailash C. TARNEJA, Appellant. No. 26421. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two. June 15, 2005. *558 M. Douglas Harpool, Kristoffer R. Barefield, Lathrop & Gage, L.C., Springfield, for appellant. Mark J. Millsap, J. Matthew Miller, Baird, L

(2008) Maurice John GATES, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF LEBANON, et al., Defendants. Case No. 08-3293-CV-S-ODS. United States District Court, W.D. Missouri, Southern Division. October 22, 2008. ORDER AND OPINION GRANTING DEFENDANTS' PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS ORTRIE D. SMITH, District Judge. Pending is Defendants' partial motion to dismiss, wh

PER CURIAM. Erelson Warner appeals his sentences under the “Prison Releasee Reoffender Punishment Act.” See 775.082(8), Fla. Stat. (1997). We affirm, but, as we did in Woods v. State, 740 So.2d 20 (Fla. 1st DCA) rev. granted 740 So.2d 529 (Fla. 1999), we certify the following question to the Florida Supreme Court: DOES THE PRISON RELEASEE REOFFENDER PUNISHMENT ACT, CODIFIE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF No. 84948 THOMAS JOSEPH HARRIS, DECEASED. TODD ROBBEN, Appellant, FIL VS. TARA FLANAGAN, IN HER CAPACITY JUL 08 2022 AS THE COURT APPOINTED

520 F.Supp.2d 1349 (2007) Wade E. JENSEN and Donald D. Goff, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. SOLVAY CHEMICALS, INC., Solvay America, Inc., and Solvay America Companies Pension Plan, Defendants. No. 06-CV-273 J. United States District Court, D. Wyoming. October 18, 2007. *1350 Richard H.

657 S.E.2d 528 (2008) WOODHAM v. CITY of ATLANTA et al. (Two Cases). Nos. S07A1309, S07A1566. Supreme Court of Georgia. February 11, 2008. *529 John Floyd Woodham, Woodham and Associates, LLC, Atlanta, Appellant pro se. Frances Conway Mulderig, Asst. Atty. Gen., Thurbert E. Baker, Atty. Gen., Dept. of Law, Atlanta; Joshua

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Western District STATE OF MISSOURI, ) ) Respondent, ) ) WD86924 V. ) ) OPINION FILED: JAMES KEITH EGGLESTON,

CLAY D. LAND, CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiffs are shareholders of Defendant Aflac Incorporated ("AFLAC"). Concerned about several corporate transactions and potential mismanagement, they urged AFLAC to bring claims against certain officers and members of the board of directors for breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, and violations of sections 10(b), 14(a), and 20A(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. §§

OPINION James Douglas Johnson, Jr., has appealed his conviction of the offense of attempted murder. After the jury found him guilty, the judge assessed his punishment at confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections for twenty years. We affirm. Appellant has ten numbered grounds of error, but they really amount to two questions for us: One — Did the trial court err in orally communicating with the jury without th

IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT U.S. BANK TRUST, N.A., TRUSTEE, ) ) Respondent, ) ) WD86866 v. ) ) OPINION FILED: ) November 5, 2024 ) D

ROBIN F. WYNNE, Judge. _JjTara Wittig, Randy Millsap, and Josh Davis separately appeal from the order of the circuit court terminating their parental rights to their children. We affirm the order of the circuit court as to all three appellants. This case began on March 5, 2010, when the Arkansas Department of Human Services (DHS or the Department) took a seventy-two-hour

*658MEMORANDUM OF DECISION TERRY L. MYERS, Chief Judge. On July 10, 2012, Douglas and Janina Johns (“Debtors”) filed a chapter 13 petition. Their case was converted to chapter 7 on May 1, 2013. Debtors claimed a homestead exemption in several separately described but contiguous parcels of real property in Juliaetta, Idaho. Banner Bank objected to Debt