Cases

OPINION W. Neal McBrayer, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Andy D. Bennett and Richard H. Dinkins, JJ., joined. A secured creditor filed suit against a trucking company and two guarantors seeking a deficiency judgment after disposition of the collateral securing payment of the d

BARBERA, J. These consolidated cases present us with our first opportunity to interpret Maryland Code (2001, 2008 Repl. Vol., 2010 Supp.), § 8-301 of the Criminal Procedure Article (“C.P.”),1 providing for Petitions for Writs of Actual Innocence based on *164newly discovered evidence. Both Appe

133 Cal.App.3d 890 (1982) 184 Cal. Rptr. 390 LUCILA GARCIA, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. DOUGLAS AIRCRAFT COMPANY et al., Defendants and Respondents. Docket No. 63950. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four. July 15, 1982. *892 COUNSEL Stutman, Treister & Glatt, Anthony Ca

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 18–1092 Filed March 20, 2020 ANTHONY ROLAND, Appellee, vs. ANNETT HOLDINGS, INC., Appellant. On review from the Iowa Court of Appeals. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Karen A. Romano, Senior Judge. Employer seeks further review of court of appeals decision that affirmed the district court ruling certifying a class actio

Berger, J. This appeal arises from a decision by Appellee, the Maryland Department of the Environment (“MDE” or “the Department”), to issue a refuse disposal system permit to Appellee, Tolson and Associates, LLC (“Tolson”) on November 24, 2014. The Tolson Rubble Landfill permit (“permit” or “the permit”) authorized Tolson to construct

Affirm in part; Reverse and Render in part; Remand and Opinion Filed August 13, 2013 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas __________________________________ NO. 05-12-00963-CV CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, Appellant V. ANTHONY ARREDONDO, CHARLES S. SWANER, JAM

WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge. In this case, we are presented with former participants in a drug conspiracy who raise a myriad of challenges to their convictions and sentences. We affirm in all respects except we remand for the resen-tencing of two defendants because the district court erred by applying U.S.S.G. § 2Dl.l(d)(l), the drug offense murder cross reference, to their sentence

693 So.2d 465 (1996) Ex parte CITY OF JACKSONVILLE. (Re Anthony W. COUCH v. CITY OF JACKSONVILLE). 1950751. Supreme Court of Alabama. December 6, 1996. Rehearing Denied February 21, 1997. O. Stanley Thornton of Wooten, Thornton, Carpenter, O'Brien, Lazenby & Lawrence, Talladega, for Petitioner. Douglas Corretti and Mary Douglas Hawkins of Cor

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Nos. 99-4019, 99-4074, 99-4279, 99-4280, 99-4281, 99-4283 & 99-4296 United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony Thompson, Stephanie Johnson, Anthony D. Spradley, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division. No. IP-98-38-CR-01-13-M/F--Larry J. McKinney, Chief Judge. Argued June 4, 2001--Decided April 9, 2002 Before Rippl

Justice Thomas, with whom The Chief Justice, Justice O’Connor, and Justice Scalia join, dissenting. It is ironic that the Court bases today’s decision on the right of the people to “choose whom they please to govern them.” See ante, at 783, 793, 795, 819. Under our Constitution, there is only one State whose people have the right to “choose whom they please” to represent Arkan

This is an appeal from the involuntary dismissal of a zoning action pursuant to Rule 41(b), Ala.R.Civ.P. The record reveals the following facts. Anthony W. Couch purchased two parcels of land in the City of Jacksonville in February 1992, with the intent to build a number of duplexes on one of the parcels. Before he purchased the land, Couch obtained information from the city on the zoning status of the land to ensure that duplexes could be built on the property. At that time, t

After Remand from the Supreme Court The prior judgment of this court has been reversed and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. On remand to this court, and in compliance with the Supreme Court's opinion of December 6, 1996, 693 So.2d 465 (Ala. 1996), the judgment of the trial court is hereby affirmed. AFFIRMED. ROBERTSON, P.J., and YATES, CRAWLEY, and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

961 F.Supp. 1288 (1997) UNITED STATES ex rel. Daniel G. O'KEEFE, Plaintiffs, v. McDONNELL DOUGLAS CORPORATION, Defendants. No. 4:93CV02188 GFG. United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division. March 10, 1997. *1289 Daniel J. McMichael, McMichael and Logan, Chesterfield, MO, Claire M. Schenk, Office of U.S. Atty., St

GUIDRY, Justice.* | We granted writs in these consolidated matters to consider whether the court of appeal correctly vacated the arbitration award, which had been confirmed by the district court. The court of appeal vacated the award on the basis the arbitration panel, in applying a statute of peremption incorrectly, disturbed a vested right of the plaintiff and, thus, the panel violated the plai

JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *872THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint for Personal Injuries and Damages, filed February 3, 2018 (Doc. 23)("Motion"). The Court held a hearing on June 20, 2018. The primary issue is whether Plaintiff Shirley Walker may sue Great West Ca

530 U.S. 290 (2000) SANTA FE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT v. DOE, individually and as next friend for HER MINOR CHILDREN, et al. No. 99-62. United States Supreme Court. Argued March 29, 2000. Decided June 19, 2000. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT *291

373 B.R. 773 (2007) In re PAN AMERICAN HOSPITAL CORPORATION Pan American Medical Centers, Inc., Debtors. Bankruptcy Nos. 04-11819-BKC-AJC, 04-11820-BKC-AJC. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida, Miami Division. July 17, 2007. Grisel Alonso, Esq, Miami, FL, Patricia M. Arias, Esq, Miami, FL, Gregory P. Borgognoni, Miami, FL, William L. Blagg, Esq, Miami, FL, Leyza Fl

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO GRANT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND ANTHONY W. ISHII, Senior District Judge. I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY In this action Eminence Investors, L.L.L.P. and John Does (“Plaintiffs”) seek to recover for Defendant Bank of New York Mellon’s alleged breaches of duties it owed as the Indenture Trustee of bonds issued to fund the development of real proper

JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *1060THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendants' Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony of William Patterson, filed August 30, 2018 (Doc. 72)("Motion"). The Court held a hearing on November 21, 2018. The primary issues are: (i) whether the Court should allow William Patte

PER CURIAM. This appeal presents purely a fact question which is to be resolved by a determination of the relative credibility of the parties and their respective witnesses. The trial judge resolved this issue and we agree with that determination. Affirmed.