Cases

YEGAN, Acting P.J. *909 "The purpose of the law of contracts is to protect the reasonable expectations of the parties." ( Ben - Zvi v. Edmar Co. (1995)

Chief Justice Suttell, for the Court. The plaintiff, Moises Pineda (Pineda), appeals from a Superior Court judgment granting the motion of the defendant, Chase Bank USA, N.A. (Chase), for summary judgment with respect to all claims asserted by Pineda against Chase. This matter came before the Supreme Court pursuant to an order directing the parties to appear and show cause why the issue

Feters, J. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Con-nor, J.), entered December 28, 2005 in Columbia County, which, among other things, dismissed defendant’s counterclaims, upon a decision of the court. In 1997, defendant mortgaged a parcel of property in the Town of Stockport, Columbia County. Defendant used the property as her second residence each weekend until late 2000, when she began to visit on a mo

Opinion GILBERT, P. J. The practice of law can be abundantly rewarding, but also stressful. The absence of civility displayed by some practitioners heightens stress and debases the legal profession. Those attorneys who allow their personal animosity for an opposing counsel or an opposing party to infect a case damage their reputations and blemish the digni

OPINION JOHNSEN, Judge: ¶ 1 In this dispute between two lenders, we address the doctrines of “replacement” and equitable subrogation as they apply to respective lien rights. We affirm the superior court’s application of the replacement doctrine to a claim by US Bank, N.A. for declaratory relief. We vacate the court’s application

*216ORDER DAVID C. CAMPBELL, District Judge. Appellants Douglas Rhoads and Shannon Rhoads (“the Rhoadses”) and their attorney Ronald Ryan (collectively “Appellants”) have filed an unopposed “Request for Certification of Direct Appeal to Court of Appeals” of their Chapter 11 Bankruptcy order. Doc. 17-1. Appellants have appealed the final order of the U

JUSTICE GABRIEL delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶ 1 This case principally requires us to decide the relative priority of competing charging orders filed by multiple judgment creditors against a foreign judgment debtor’s membership interests in several Colorado limited liability companies. 1

OPINION & ORDER NELSON S. ROMÁN, United States District Judge On December I, 2015, Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“JPMC”) filed a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 66.) Subsequently, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, — U.S. -, 136 S.Ct. 1540, 194 L.Ed.2d 635 (2016) (hereinafter, “

MEMORANDUM ORDER AND OPINION Robert M. Dow, Jr., United States District Judge Plaintiff Charles Gagnon (“Plaintiff’) brings his amended complaint [63] against Defendants JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase”), Seterus, Inc. (“Seterus”), Pierce & Associates, P.C. (“Pierce”), Equifax Information Services LLC (“Equifax”), and Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (“Ex-perian”) (collectively, “Defendant

OPINION HOWE, Judge. ¶ 1 Steven and Sarah Waltner brought numerous claims against JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., (“Chase”) and California Reconveyance Company (“CRC”), arising out of Chase’s attempts to foreclose on two properties the Waltners owned. The Waltners appeal from the trial court’s decisions (1) denying their application for entry of default judgment, (2) granting Chase and CRC’s motion for summary

PHILIP A. BRIMMER, United States District Judge This is an appeal by debtors Alexander N. Kim and Laura J. Foster ("debtors") from the November 15, 2016 order [Docket No. 7-15 at 172-182] of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Colorado (the "bankruptcy court"). The Court's jurisdiction is based on 28 U.S.C. § 158

This case involves a legal action by Jefferson County ("the County") against several defendants seeking damages stemming from financial transactions involving the County's sewer system. J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc. ("J.P. Morgan"), JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. ("JPMorgan Chase"), Charles E. LeCroy, and Douglas W. MacFaddin (hereinafter referred to collectively as "the petitioners"), all defendants below, petition this Court for writs of mandamus directing the trial court to dismiss this

738 F.Supp.2d 1093 (2010) Janice ABAT et al., Plaintiff, v. CHASE BANK USA, N.A., Defendants. Case No.: SACV 07-01476-CJC(ANx). United States District Court, C.D. California, Southern Division. September 14, 2010. *1094 Anne Marie Murphy, Joseph Winters Cotchett, Niall P. McCarthy, Cotchett Pitre and McCarthy, Burlingame, CA, Dav

MEMORANDUM OPINION JEFFERY A. DELLER, Bankruptcy Judge. The primary matter before the Court is Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.’s *617Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint (the “Motion to Dismiss”), seeking dismissal of all but two Counts asserted in the adversary complaint filed on December 24, 2010 (the

OMNIBUS ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION JAMES LAWRENCE KING, District Judge. THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.’s Motion to Dismiss on Grounds of Preemption and Further Reconsideration (DE # 1484), filed May 17, 2011.1 Defendants move for reconsideration of the Court’s earlier Omnibus Order Denying Dism

PER CURIAM: * The court has carefully considered the briefs, oral argument, and pertinent portions of the record. After such review, we have determined that the judgment of the district court should be affirmed for essentially the reasons set forth by the district court. Boutari v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., No. 5:09-cv-00608, doc. 88 (W.D. Tex. June 10, 2010) (Order Accepting Report an

740 F.Supp.2d 1192 (2010) JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Plaintiff, v. KB HOME et al., Defendants. And All Related Actions. No. 2:08-CV-01711-PMP-RJJ. United States District Court, D. Nevada. September 27, 2010. *1196 Damion Stodola, James E. Hough, Jamie A. Levitt, Morrison & Foerster LLP, New York, NY, Allyson R. Noto, Jeffrey

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS [Docket No. 48] JOSEPH C. SPERO, United States Magistrate Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Patricia McNeary-Calloway, Colin MacKinnon, Terrie McKinnon, Andrea North, and Sheila M. Mayko (collectively “Plaintiffs”) initiated this putative class action on June 20, 2011, challenging Defendants JPMorgan Chase, N.A. and C

960 A.2d 108 (2008) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellant v. Bruce Alan CHASE, Appellee. No. 18 WAP 2005 Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued September 13, 2006. Decided November 26, 2008. *111 Bradley Henry Foulk, Erie County Dist. Attorney's Office, Douglas Grant McCormick, for the Com. of PA, appellant.

182 P.3d 274 (2008) 219 Or. App. 387 STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Ronald Scott CHASE, Defendant-Appellant. 200417992, A128052. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted August 31, 2007. Decided April 16, 2008. David C. Degner, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With him on