Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Double Jump, Inc.”
Double Eagle Alloys v. Hooperpublic domain
Appellate Case: 24-5089 Document: 43-1 Date Filed: 04/22/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 22, 2025
ORDER After their boat was stolen and their insurance claim was denied, William and Brian Jump brought suit in diversity against the underwriter and three other parties who had been involved in brokering and administering their insurance policy. The district court dismissed the underwriter after accepting its argument that the Jumps had failed to sue within the one-year time limit prescribed by their policy, and also dismissed the und
FabMetals, Inc. v. Stratacache, Inc.public domain
[Cite as FabMetals, Inc. v. Stratacache, Inc., 2024-Ohio-2006.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY FABMETALS, INC. : : Appellant : C.A. No. 29666 :
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON January 19, 2012 Session GARY PAUL v. DENNIS WATSON and DARLENE WATSON d/b/a DOUBLE D LAWN CARE AND LANDSCAPING Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Benton County No. 1845 Ron E. Harmon, Chancellor No. W2011-00687-COA-R3-CV - Filed February
Case: 22-2185 Document: 58 Page: 1 Filed: 04/04/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ AMS-OSRAM USA INC., FKA AMS SENSORS USA, INC., FKA TEXAS ADVANCED OPTOELECTRONIC SOLUTIONS, INC. Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant v. RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., FKA INTERSIL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant ________________
WECC, Inc.public domain
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of -- ) ) WECC, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 60949 ) Under Contract No. 73-0014-1522 ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: G. Scott Walters, Esq. Brian S. Wood, Esq.
State ex rel. Double v. Indus. Comm.public domain
OPINIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO The full texts of the opinions of the Supreme Court of Ohio are being transmitted electronically beginning May 27, 1992, pursuant to a pilot project implemented by Chief Justice Thomas J. Moyer. Please call any errors to the attention of the Reporter's Office of the Supreme Court of Ohio. Attention: Walter S. Kobalka, Reporter, or Justine Michael, Administrative Assistant. Tel.: (614) 466-4961; in Ohio 1-800-826-9010. Your comments on
USCA4 Appeal: 24-1912 Doc: 41 Filed: 02/10/2025 Pg: 1 of 17 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-1912 CITY OF MARTINSVILLE, VIRGINIA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC.; OPTUMRX, INC.,
Welgo, Inc. v. Wellgistics, LLCpublic domain
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE WELLGISTICS, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff/counterclaim ) defendant, ) C.A. No.: N22C-08-182 KMM ) v. ) ) WELGO, INC., )
USCA4 Appeal: 24-1912 Doc: 41 Filed: 02/10/2025 Pg: 1 of 17 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-1912 CITY OF MARTINSVILLE, VIRGINIA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC.; OPTUMRX, INC.,
Ballistic Recovery Systems, Inc.public domain
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of -- ) ) Ballistic Recovery Systems, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 61333 ) Under Contract No. SPE4A7-16-C-0218 ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Mr. Enrique Dillon Director/President
Wellgistics, LLC v. Welgo, Inc.public domain
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE WELLGISTICS, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff/counterclaim ) defendant, ) C.A. No.: N22C-08-182 KMM ) v. ) ) WELGO, INC., ) ) D
Antidote Health Plan of Arizona, Inc. v. Becerrapublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ANTIDOTE HEALTH PLAN OF ARIZONA, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 1:23-cv-03578 (TNM) v. XAVIER BECERRA, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Defendant.
140 B.R. 969 (1992) In the Matter of MAHURKAR DOUBLE LUMEN HEMODIALYSIS CATHETER PATENT LITIGATION. No. MDL 853. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D. May 28, 1992. *970 Joseph N. Hosteny, Raymond P. Niro, John C. Janka, and Michael P. Mazza, Niro, Scavone, Haller & Niro, Chicago, Ill., for Sakharam D. Mahurkar. Ma
Justin Lytle v. Nutramax Laboratories, Inc.public domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JUSTIN LYTLE and CHRISTINE No. 22-55744 MUSTHALER, D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellees, 5:19-cv-00835- v. FMO-SP NUTRAMAX LABORATORIES, ORDER AND INC. AND NUTRAMAX AMENDED LABORATORIES VETERINARY
Lathem v. Double E. of Yonkers, Inc.public domain
In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered January 27, 1975, which dismissed the complaint at the end of their case, at a jury trial. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. No findings of fact were presented for review. Two eight-year-old girls in a supermarket had to use the ladies’ room. An employee direct
Qualitee Moshi v. Kia Motors Am., Inc.public domain
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0256p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT 24-3609 ┐ QUALITEE MOSHI, Administrator of the Estate on │ behalf of Matthew P. Moshi,
ITG Brands, Inc. v. Reynolds American, Inc.public domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ITG BRANDS, LLC, ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) C.A. No. 2017-0129-AGB REYNOLDS AMERICAN, INC. and ) R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO ) COMPANY, ) )
US Dominion, Inc. v. Newsmax Media, Inc.public domain
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE US DOMINION, INC., DOMINION ) VOTING SYSTEMS, INC., and ) DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS ) CORPORATION, ) C.A. No.: N21C-08-063 EMD ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. )
Justin Lytle v. Nutramax Laboratories, Inc.public domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JUSTIN LYTLE and CHRISTINE No. 22-55744 MUSTHALER, D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellees, 5:19-cv-00835- v. FMO-SP NUTRAMAX LABORATORIES, INC. AND NUTRAMAX OPINION LABORATORIES VETERINARY SCIENCES, INC, Defendants