Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Dorsey v. Boise Cascade L L C”
Alan G. Ross v. Tommy A. Dorseypublic domain
J. JONES, Justice. This is a dispute over a strip of beachfront property adjacent to a Bonner County subdivision. The appellants, Tommy and Erin Dorsey, contend that the beachfront property was conveyed to them when they bought Lot 1, which is adjacent to the beach. The Respondents, who own the other lots in the subdivision, contend t
294 F.Supp. 1015 (1968) BOISE CASCADE INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED, a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. NORTHERN MINNESOTA PULPWOOD PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION, an unincorporated association, and Emery Carlson, Norman Warpula, and James Parnham, individually and as officers of said association, Defendants. No. 5-68 Civ. 52. United States District Court D. Minnesota, Fifth Division.
Davis v. Boise Cascade Corp.public domain
288 N.W.2d 680 (1979) Victor R. DAVIS, Appellant, v. BOISE CASCADE CORPORATION, Respondent. No. 49660. Supreme Court of Minnesota. December 7, 1979. *681 Steven A. Nelson, International Falls, for appellant. Dorsey, Windhorst, Hannaford, Whitney & Halladay and Emery W. Bartle, Minneapolis, for respondent. Consid
272 F.Supp. 847 (1967) BOISE CASCADE CORPORATION d/b/a Kingsberry Homes, Plaintiff, v. GWINNETT COUNTY, GEORGIA, and W. Ray Morgan, W. R. Pruitt, and O. Felton Thompson, as Commissioners of Roads and Revenues of Gwinnett County, Georgia, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 9763. United States District Court N. D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. August 14, 1967.
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,484 John F. Maher v. Zapata Corporation v. William Maldonado, Objector-Appellantpublic domain
*438 GARWOOD, Circuit Judge: This is an appeal by William Maldonado, a Zapata Corporation stockholder, from a judgment approving settlement of a shareholders’ derivative action brought by other shareholders on behalf of Zapata Corporation against several of its past and present officers and directors base
United States Shoe Corp. v. United Statespublic domain
Memorandum Opinion Restani, Judge: The judgment in this action awarded plaintiff $8,281.87, “together with interest and costs as provided by law.” U.S. Shoe Corp. v. United States, Slip Op. 95-197 (Dec. 4, 1995); see also U.S. Shoe Corp. v. United States, 907 F. Supp. 408 (Ct. Int’l Trade 1995). It has come to the court’s attention that “interest” is not a matter without controversy
United States Shoe Corp. v. United Statespublic domain
907 F.Supp. 408 (1995) UNITED STATES SHOE CORP., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant. Slip Op. 95-173. Court No. 94-11-00668. United States Court of International Trade. October 25, 1995. *409 Siegel, Mandell & Davidson, P.C., New York City (Brian S. Goldstein, Steven S. Weiser, Laurence M. Friedman and Paul A. Horowitz),
Gore v. Lafarge North America, Inc.public domain
THOMPSON, Presiding Judge. Albert Dean Gore appeals from the judgment of the Shelby Circuit Court (“the trial court”) finding that a work-related injury to Gore resulted in a permanent partial disability of 10% and awarding workers’ compensation benefits accordingly- The record indicates the following. Gore worked for Lafarge North America, Inc. (“Lafarge”), as a heavy-equipment operator. On February 12, 200
United States v. Kingpublic domain
660 F.3d 1071 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cory Ledeal KING, Defendant-Appellant. No. 09-30442. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted November 3, 2010. Decided October 3, 2011. *1074 Syrena Case Hargrove, Office of the United States Attorney, Boise, ID, Rob
Minnesota Public Interest Research Group v. Butzpublic domain
401 F.Supp. 1276 (1975) MINNESOTA PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP and Sierra Club, Plaintiffs, v. Earl V. BUTZ, Individually and as Secretary of Agriculture, et al., Defendants. No. 4-72 Civil 598. United States District Court, D. Minnesota, Fourth Division. August 13, 1975. *1277 *1278
Magee v. Trustees of Hamline Universitypublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER JOHN R. TUNHEIM, District Judge. This action arises out of the termination of Plaintiff Robin Magee’s employment by the Hamline University School of Law. The matter came before United States Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan on Magee’s motion to amend her complaint. Additionally, Defendant David Titus and Defendants Trustees of the Hamline University (“Hamline”) and Donal
TWN, INC. v. Michelpublic domain
66 P.3d 1031 (2003) 2003 UT App 70 TWN, INC., a Utah corporation, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Uwe MICHEL, an individual; and Ullrich Michel, an individual, Defendants and Appellants. No. 20010999-CA. Court of Appeals of Utah. March 13, 2003. Bruce J. Nelson, Nelson, Rasmussen & Christensen, Salt Lake City, for Appellants. Vincent C.
Grassmueck v. Barnettpublic domain
281 F.Supp.2d 1227 (2003) Michael GRASSMUECK, Plaintiff, v. Dwayne BARNETT, et al., Defendants. No. C03-122P. United States District Court, W.D. Washington. July 7, 2003. *1228 Bruce E.H. Johnson of Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, Seattle, WA and Francis N. Scollan, Mark R. Hartney and Patrick E. Breen of Allen Matkins Leck Gamble &am;
United States v. Arrowhead Refining Co.public domain
ORDER MAGNUSON, District Judge. This matter is before the court on the defendants’ and third-party plaintiffs’ objections to Magistrate Judge McNulty’s Report and Recommendation dated November 10, 1992 granting third party defendant Mobil’s motion for summary judgment. Pursuant to statute, the court has conducted a de novo review of the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Local Rule 72.1(c). Bas
ROSS, Circuit Judge. This environmental litigation is before this court en banc for the second time. In Minnesota Public Interest Research Group (MPIRG) v. Butz, 498 F.2d 1314 (8th Cir. 1974) (en banc), we affirmed an order of the district court which temporarily enjoined commercial timber cutting in the Portal Zone of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area (BWCA)
Omega Engineering, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co.public domain
908 F.Supp. 1084 (1995) OMEGA ENGINEERING, INC., Plaintiff, v. EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, Defendant. Civ. No. 5:90CV00554 (PCD). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. December 1, 1995. *1085 *1086 *1087 *1088
Grassmueck v. Barnettpublic domain
*1230ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS, RE OUTSIDE DIRECTOR DEFENDANTS, STEVEN M. READ, et al. PECHMAN, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ Motions To Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Outside Directors Steven M. Read, Jerry R. May, Ph.D., Lawrence J. Lemak, M.D., Michael S. Gilb
Brevik v. Kite Painting, Inc.public domain
404 N.W.2d 367 (1987) Dennis BREVIK, et al., Appellants, State of Minnesota, Plaintiff's-Intervenor, v. KITE PAINTING, INC., Respondent. No. CX-86-1878. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. April 28, 1987. Review Granted June 26, 1987. *368 David A. Singer, Singer & Singer, Minneapolis, for appellants. H
Andersons, Inc. v. Consol, Inc.public domain
185 F.Supp.2d 833 (2001) THE ANDERSONS, INC., Plaintiff, v. CONSOL, INC., Defendant. No. 3:00 CV 7290. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division. January 25, 2001. *834 Elizabeth J. Hall, The Andersons, Inc., Maumee, OH, James R. Jeffery, Spengler Nathanson, Toledo, OH, for Andersons, Inc., The, Plaintiff.
520 A.2d 677 (1987) OFFICE OF PEOPLE'S COUNSEL, Petitioner, v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF the DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Respondent. Liberty Transportation Management Corporation, Abbey Casualty Insurance Company, Amalgamated Casualty Insurance Company, and Columbia Mutual Insurance Company, Intervenors. No. 85-1203. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued February 19, 1