Cases

05/07/2025 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON January 8, 2025 Session PAMELA CRENSHAW ON BEHALF OF HER MOTHER DOROTHY MURPHY v. METHODIST HEALTHCARE - MEMPHIS HOSPITALS, ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT-3080-23

ORDER Claiming that she suffers from various physical and mental limitations, Dorothy Murphy applied to the Social Security Administration for supplemental security income and disability benefits. After an evidentiary hearing, the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) found that despite Murphy’s limitations, there were a sufficient number of jobs available for a person in her condition, and consequently denied her application. When the Appeal

LOKEN, Circuit Judge. - Plaintiffs are ranchers in,. Fall River County, South Dakota, who own properties underlying and surrounding a railway right-of-way easement granted by the United States to Grand Island and Wyoming Central Railroad Company in 1897. Burlington Northern Railroad Company (“BN”) subsequently acquired the easement but ceased railroad operations on the line in 1

HARRELL, J. On 3 January 2008, Sheila Murphy, in her capacity as the personal representative for the Estate of Dorothy Mae Urban, filed suit in the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County against Robert Street, Urban’s son. The Estate asked the court to declare null and void a 30 May 2007 deed executed by Urban to Street for an improved residential property at 229 Dale Street, Pasadena, Maryland (“Pasadena property”), because al

WATTS, J. The Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County denied the motion of appellant, Shelia Murphy, Personal Representative of the Estate of Dorothy Mae Urban,1 to stay and dismiss a foreclosure action that had been instituted by appellees, Jeremy K. Fishman, Samuel D. Williamowsky, and Erica T. Davis Ruth, Substitute Trustees. Appellant noted an appeal raising five issues, which we rephrase and c

799 N.E.2d 843 (2003) 343 Ill. App.3d 1155 279 Ill.Dec. 40 In re SHANNA W., a Minor (The People of the State of Illinois, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Dorothy W., Respondent-Appellant). No. 1-03-0159. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Sixth Division. October 17, 2003. *844 Pub

HANSEN, Circuit Judge. Dorothy Jean Egenberger pleaded guilty to five criminal counts related to her fraudulent use of social security numbers. She entered her plea after the Supreme Court’s decision in Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), but prior to the Court’s decision in United States v. Booker, -

716 S.W.2d 870 (1986) Dorothy MURPHY, Respondent, v. Jimmie Lee MURPHY, Appellant. No. WD 37658. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. September 16, 1986. Lori J. Levine, Carson, Coil, Riley, McMillin, Levine & Veit, P.C., Jefferson City, for appellant. David L. Knight, Knight, Ford, Wright, Atwill, Parshall & Baker, Columbia, for respondent.</

PER CURIAM. We initially accepted review of the decision of the Fourth District Court of Appeal in State Department of Transportation v. Barbara’s Creative Jewelry, Inc., 728 So.2d 240 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), which certified a question to be of great public importance. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. Upon further consideration, we find that review was improvidently granted. Accordingly, this review procee

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice, dissenting. [¶ 37] I dissent. [¶ 38] This case was scheduled for a jury trial. The trial court, on its own initiative and without briefing by the parties, denied the jury trial and determined the case would be tried before the court. The trial court’s explanation for canceling the jury trial was short and over simplified and its reasoning and analysis undevelope

PRESIDING JUSTICE MAAG delivered the opinion of the court: Plaintiff, Dorothy Murphy, appeals from a Madison County circuit court order dismissing Alton Memorial Hospital, Dr. Gary Lewis, and Dr. John Hoelscher as respondents in discovery/ defendants (respondents) in plaintiffs lawsuit. According to plaintiff’s pleadings, Barbara W

195 P.3d 1147 (2008) In the Matter of the ESTATE OF Edna R. MURPHY, Deceased. Dorothy J. Moore, Appellant, v. John H. Licht, Personal Representative of the Estate of Edna Murphy, Appellee. No. 07CA0901. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. III. August 7, 2008. Rehearing Denied September 18, 2008. *1149 Ginsberg an

MURPHY, Circuit Judge. This defamation action was brought by Kathleen Suggs against Dorothy Stanley and Betty Hendricks, the sisters of her deceased companion. The jury ruled in favor of Suggs, and the sisters appeal from the judgment, contending that the district court2 erred by denying their motion for judgment as a matter of law and that it improperly admitted certain evidence. Suggs filed a cro

NAJAM, Judge. STATEMENT OF THE CASE Danny and Dorothy Murphy appeal from the trial court's order granting summary judgment in favor of John F. Cole, Jr. in a negligence action brought by the Murphys against Cole. We reverse. On January 8, 1992, Danny was a passenger in a vehicle driven by Cole, Danny's half-brother. Cole lost control of the vehicle and collided with another vehicle and

PETERSON, J. We adopt the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law as set forth below and, accordingly, affirm the final judgment. FINAL JUDGMENT POET ROBERT FROST in his poem “Mending Wall” closes with the phrase “GOOD FENCES MAKE GOOD NEIGHBORS”. The essence of this cause involves the placement of a fence between two neighbors and came on t

680 S.E.2d 110 (2009) Evelyn L. "Peach" MURPHY, Administratrix of the Estate of and Andrew John Murphy, Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. EASTERN AMERICAN ENERGY CORPORATION, a West Virginia corporation; Kenneth Greathouse, a West Virginia resident; Rodney Paxton, a West Virginia resident; Dorothy Lewis, a West Virginia resident; Dennis Lewis, a West Virginia resident; The Jack Company, a Pennsylvania corporation; S.W. Jack Drilling Company, a Penns

171 F.Supp.2d 636 (2001) Denise MURPHY, et al. v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO, et al. No. CIV. A. 00-2457. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. April 24, 2001. Stephen Barnett Murray, Perry Michael Nicosia, David T. Smith, Murray Law Firm, New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiffs. *637 Stephen H. Kupperman, Phillip A. Whittmann,

763 S.W.2d 237 (1988) Jimmie Lee MURPHY, Appellant, v. Dorothy MURPHY, Respondent. No. WD 40413. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. November 22, 1988. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer Denied December 27, 1988. Application to Transfer Denied February 14, 1989. *238 Lori J. Levine, Je

964 P.2d 581 (1998) John Tucker MURPHY, Sr., Charles E. Murphy, Dorothy Maryse Neubrand, Evelyn Collette Nolan, Margaret M. Walsh, Winifred Fitzmorris, Keith Tucker, and Donna Oleski, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Charles Frederick GLENN and Jean Kathryn Glenn, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 96CA0093, 96CA0094. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. IV. March 5, 1998. Reheari

Cite as 2020 Ark. App. 34 Digitally signed by Elizabeth ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS Perry Date: 2022.08.10 12:40:13 DIVISION I -05'00' No. CV-19-177 Adobe Acrobat version: 2022.001.20169 Opinion Delivered: January 22, 2020 CARL LEWIS A