Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Dorothy M. Cook”
Dorothy Cook v. Edward H. Withers, M.D.public domain
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 13, 2004 Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 13, 2004. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals<
Cook v. Barnhartpublic domain
347 F.Supp.2d 1125 (2004) Dorothy COOK, Plaintiff, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. Civil Action No. 03-M-742-N. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. February 17, 2004. *1127 Georgia H. Ludlum, Law Offices of Georgia H. Ludlum, Dothan, AL, for Plaintiff. Leura Ga
Cook v. Harrispublic domain
OPINION BAILEY, Judge. Case Summary Appellant-Respondent Dorothy C. Hol-lenga ("Hollenga") and Appellant-Interve-nor Daniel J. Cook ("Cook") appeal the trial court's orders granting Gene Stephen Harris (Harris"), Greg Stewart ("Stewart"), and Janet Becker's ("Becker") (collectively "the Estate Guardians") petition to set aside Hollenga's power of attorney naming Cook as her attorney in fa
Dorothy B. Bach v. First Union National Bankpublic domain
OPINION JULIA SMITH GIBBONS, Circuit Judge. Following trial, a jury determined that defendant-appellant First Union National Bank (FUNB) breached certain provisions of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1681-1681x, and awarded $400,000 in compensatory damages and $2,628,600 in punitive damages to plaintiff-appellee, Dorothy Bach. FUNB app
Cook v. Blockpublic domain
609 F.Supp. 1036 (1985) Dorothy M. COOK, et al., Plaintiffs, v. John R. BLOCK, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 82-2659. United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 15, 1985. *1037 *1038 *1039 Ann S. DuRoss, Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C.,
Taylor v. Cook County Sheriff's Merit Boardpublic domain
Defendant Sheriff Michael Sheahan charged plaintiff Arthur Taylor (Taylor) with a violation of the rules and regulations of the Cook County Department of Corrections (DOC) and sought his dismissal as an officer with the DOC. The complaint was filed with the defendant Cook County Sheriff's Merit Board (Board), which conducted a hearing regarding the matter. At the hearing's close, the Board issued an order finding cause for separation. Taylor then brought this action for administrative
Cannon, Dorothy v. Spring Hill Residential, LLCpublic domain
FILED Nov 21, 2019 01:14 PM(CT) TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT NASHVILLE Dorothy Cannon, ) Docket No. 2018-06-2049 Employee, ) V. ) Spring Hill Residential, LLC, ) State File No. 5562-2018 Employer, ) And ) Safety National Casualty Corp., ) Judge Kenneth M. Switzer Carrier. ) EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER Dorothy Cannon filed a hearing request seeking medical benefits, specific
Lockhart v. Cook County Officers Electoral Boardpublic domain
767 N.E.2d 428 (2002) 328 Ill. App.3d 838 262 Ill.Dec. 968 William LOCKHART and Ralph Bellamy, Petitioners-Appellants, v. COOK COUNTY OFFICERS ELECTORAL BOARD, and its members Daniel Madden, Thomas V. Lyons, and Bernadette Freeman, as designees for David D. Orr, Cook County Clerk, Richard A. Devine, Cook County State's Attorney, and Dorothy Brown, Clerk of the Circuit Court, and Steven Burris, Respo
In re Cookpublic domain
Petitioners Merrill Cook, Charles A. Larsen, and Dorothy C. Larsen bring this petition pursuant to section 20A-7-209 of the Utah Code and rule 65A of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure. Petitioners allege that the ballot title and voter information pamphlet prepared by the Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel ("OLRGC") for Initiative A, Term Limits and Election By Majority Vote or By Runoff ("Initiative A"), are unsatisfactory in that th
Cook v. Maherpublic domain
OPINION Per Curiam: This is an appeal from an order of the district court granting a *1025petition for a writ of mandamus. The district court ordered appellants to verify signatures on petitions seeking to compel a recall election.1 On January 22, 1992, respondents, acting on behalf of
Koeller v. Cook Countypublic domain
180 Ill. App.3d 425 (1989) 535 N.E.2d 1118 DOROTHY KOELLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COOK COUNTY et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 1-87-2116. Illinois Appellate Court First District (4th Division). Opinion filed March 9, 1989. *426 *427 Law Offices of John D. Parrilli,
Cook v. Lindsay Olive Growerspublic domain
BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judge: Joseph Christopher Cook (Cook) and his wife Dorothy Cook appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Lindsay Olive Growers (LOG). Cook argues that his claims for wrongful termination, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress, and employment discrimination on the basis of religion are not preempted by § 301 of
Dorothy Smith v. Schlage Lock Company, LLCpublic domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1391 DOROTHY E. SMITH, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of Julian Jackson Smith, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SCHLAGE LOCK COMPANY, LLC, Defendant - Appellee, and AMETEK, INC., sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Haveg
Succession of Cookpublic domain
CALLOWAY, J., Pro Tempore. | iDuring the last year of his life, Joseph Robert Cook (“Joseph”) executed a will leaving the entirety of his estate to his daughter, Elizabeth. Dianne Cook (“Dianne”), and in the alternative, his housekeeper. His sons, Robert Cook (“Robert”) and David Cook (“David”), filed suit to invalidate the will on the grounds of undue influence by Dianne. Finding clear and convincing evidence of un
Dorothy R. Schroeder v. LND Management LLCpublic domain
OPINION TERRY JENNINGS, Justice. Appellant, Dorothy R. Schroeder, challenges the portion of the county court’s post-judgment order disbursing $4,000 of her $8,000 appeal bond funds as damages to appellee, LND Management, LLC (“LND”), after LND prevailed in its forcible detainer suit against her. In two issues, Schroeder contends that the county court erred
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2019-CA-00097-COA JOHN L. WARD APPELLANT v. THE ESTATE OF MARY S. COOK BY AND APPELLEES THROUGH LYNN E. COOK III, CHARLES J. COOK, AND JEAN COOK ARICK, CONSERVATORS DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/21/2018 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. DOROTHY WINSTON COLOM C
People v. Dorothy H.public domain
945 N.E.2d 81 (2011) In re WILLIAM H., Minor, Respondent-Appellee (The People of the State of Illinois, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Dorothy H., Respondent-Appellant). No. 1-10-2563. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Fifth Division. March 4, 2011. *82 Public Defender of Cook County, Chicago, Abishi C. Cunningham, Jr., Public Defend
State of Tennessee v. Dorothy Denise Crosspublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs May 21, 2014 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. DOROTHY DENISE CROSS Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No. 98878 Bobby R. McGee, Judge No. E2013-02133-CCA-R3-CD - Filed September 25, 2014 Following a jury trial in the Knox County Criminal Court, Defendant, Dorothy Denise Cross, was fo
Domenic Apostolico v. Deborah M. Pagliaropublic domain
Supreme Court No. 2024-209-Appeal. (PC 20-507) Domenic Apostolico : v. : Deborah M. Pagliaro. : NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Rhode Island Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Opinion Analyst, Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 250 Benefi
Ragland v. the Statepublic domain
McFadden, Judge. Terrance Devon Ragland appeals his convictions of rape and enticing a child for indecent purposes. Ragland argues that he received ineffective assistance of counsel but has failed to overcome the strong presumption that counsel’s performance fell within the wide range of reasonable professional assistance. He argues that the trial court improperly admitted evidenc