Cases

GREENE, Judge. Thomas H. Latimer (Plaintiff) appeals the entry of an order granting Dorothy B. Latimer (Defendant)^ Rule 60(b) motion to set aside a judgment of absolute divorce filed on 8 December 1997. The relevant facts show Plaintiff filed an action for absolute divorce on 3 November 1997, seeking a divorce from Defendant wife. On 4 November 1997, Plaintiff delivered to Defendant a copy of the complaint,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE, BUT IMPOSING ALTERNATIVE SANCTIONS William J. Martinez, United States District Judge Currently before the Court are two motions: Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Supplement Her Response to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (“Motion to Supplement”) (ECF No. 61), and Defendant’s Motion to Strike (ECF No. 64). The Co

39 F.3d 829 32 Collier Bankr.Cas.2d 418, Bankr. L. Rep. P 76,172In re Roger Eugene HUCKFELDT, Debtor.Georgianne HUCKFELDT; L.K. Kluge; Dorothy Kluge, Creditors-Appellees,v.Roger Eugene HUCKFELDT, Debtor-Appellant. No. 93-4100. United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit. Submitted May 13, 1994.Decided Oct. 28, 1994.

573 S.E.2d 708 (2002) Bernice Leo FREEMAN, Plaintiff, v. Dorothy Janie (sic) FREEMAN, Defendant. No. COA02-222. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. December 31, 2002. *709 Randall & Hill, by John C. Randall, Durham, for plaintiff-appellant. David R. Huffman, Graham, for defendant-appellee. MARTIN, Judge.

ORDER WILLIAM J. ZLOCH, District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court upon the Report And Recommendation (DE 76) filed herein by United States Magistrate Judge William Matthewman. No Objections have been filed to said Report. The Court has ’conducted a de novo review of the entire record herein and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. On December 3, 2012, the Co

MEMORANDUM OPINION SPORKIN, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court for consideration of a Consent Decree entered into by the parties. Plaintiffs’ case was originally brought in October of 1986, so it has taken ten years to reach this proposed settlement. The Court attributes this delay to the complexity of the action and the settlement discussions, as well as to the untimely death of

McKEE, Circuit Judge. Hugo Castellanos Monzón 1 appeals the District Court's denial of the Petition he filed pursuant to the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (the "Convention") 2 and the Interna

992 P.2d 917 (1999) 1999 OK CIV APP 114 Jimmie G. YOUNG, same person as Jimmy Young, and June Young, husband and wife, and Jim Young and June Young as Trustees of the Young Family Cemetery Trust, and Timothy J. Young, and Timothy E. Wells, Plaintiffs/Appellees, v. Ray VERMILLION, Cecilia Vermillion, Walter B. Anderson, Dorothy Jean Barnes, and the Trust Company of Oklahoma, Trustee of the William R. Albracht I.R.A., Defend

Affirmed and Opinion Filed August 28, 2015. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00951-CV D MAGAZINE PARTNERS, L.P. D/B/A D MAGAZINE, MAGAZINE LIMITED PARTNERS, L.P., AND ALLISON MEDIA, INC., Appellants V. JANAY BENDER ROSENTHAL, Appellee

720 F.Supp.2d 978 (2010) FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. BURNHAM MORTGAGE, INC., Exeter Title Company, Ticor Title Insurance Company, James C. Peddle, Derrick Davis, Eric C. Vehovc, Market Value Appraisal, Inc., Maya N. Jordan, Larry D. Burkes, Kevin R. Brisker, John Jeffrey Hlava, Adam Bat, Adam Butar, Zbigniew Rymarz, Waldemar Florkiewicz, Dorothy Spann, Charlene Adams, Kuba Jasny, a/k/a Grosz Piotr, Barbara Odrzywolska, Marek Maka,

The plaintiff suffered from back pain and her expert, Dr. Southmayd, an orthopedic surgeon, gave to the panel a written opinion which said in substance that the defendant, Dr. Lovejoy (an orthopedist), had failed to *974diagnose a raptured disc and had failed to undertake prompt surgical intervention. Had intervention been prompt, Dr. Southmayd added (he performed such surgery), the patient would

OPINION OF THE COURT ROSENN, Circuit Judge. In 1981, Congress, as part of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA), Pub.L. No. 97-35, 95 Stat. 357 (1981), revised the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program by providing that “specified” AFDC beneficiaries who receive lump-sum income in excess of their monthly standard of need are ineligible for program assistance for a specific perio

1 F.Supp.2d 405 (1998) William Eugene ASQUITH, Plaintiff, v. VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA, William H. Fauver, Dorothy Keller and Ken Savko, Defendants. Civil Action No. 95-300(JEI). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. March 20, 1998. *406 Loughlin & Latimer by Stephen M. Latimer, Lucille M. Rosano, Hackensack, NJ, for Plain

OPINION OF THE COURT SCHWARZER, District Judge. In this appeal, we must decide whether William Asquith, a former New Jersey State inmate, had a protected liberty interest in remaining in New Jersey’s Residential Community Release Agreement Program. We find he did not and, accordingly, affirm the district court. FACTS William Asquith was serving a five-year sentence unde

186 F.3d 407 (3rd Cir. 1999) WILLIAM EUGENE ASQUITH,v.DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA; WILLIAM H. FAUVER, COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; DOROTHY KELLER, ADMINISTRATOR, COMMUNITY RELEASE COORDINATOR; KEN SAFCO, DIRECTOR, VOLUNTEERSOF AMERICA; ROBERT GREGORY, CASE MANAGER, VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA; CHRIS ARRAYO, CASE AIDE, VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA; EDWARD McNAIR, CASE AIDE, VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA, William Asquith, Appe

OPINION OF THE COURT BECKER, Circuit Judge. Shawn James Allen Woodall, a federal prisoner, challenges recently adopted Bureau of Prison (“BOP”) regulations that limit a prisoner’s placement in community confinement to the lesser of ten percent of the prisoner’s total sentence or six months. Woodall’s appeal from the order of the District Court denying hi

ORDER MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Judge: This case is before the court on petitioners’ motion for review of Special Master Richard B. Abell’s February 16, 1993 order dismissing petitioners’ claim under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 300aa-l through 300aa-34 (West 1991 & Supp.1992) (Vaccine Act or Act). I. Facts The facts in this case ar

282 F.2d 179 Dorothy M. HARSHBERGER, as Administratrix of the Estate ofHarry Nelson Harshberger, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.ASSOCIATED TRANSPORT, INC., and Floyd Kenneth Spenton,Defendants-Appellants.ASSOCIATED TRANSPORT, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Dorothy M. HARSHBERGER, as Administratrix of the Estate ofHarry Nelson Harshberger, Deceased, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 263, 264, Dockets 259

CHIN, J. *108 **283 *263 Under Code of Civil Procedure

In each case: Judgment of Appellate Division reversed and the action remitted to that court for determination upon questions *Page 723 of fact there raised (Civ. Prac. Act, § 606), with costs to abide the event, on the ground that in each case the evidence presents questions of fact as to the defendant's negligence, and in the first case as to freedom from contributory negligence on the part of plaintiff's intestate. Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J.,