Cases

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2018-CP-01369-COA WILLIE J. McCHESTER APPELLANT v. DOROTHY A. EDWARD McCHESTER APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/04/2018 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JENNIFER T. SCHLOEGEL COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: HARRISON COUNTY CHANCERY COURT,

JAMES, J„ FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. Joe Fuller appeals the judgment of the Chancery Court of Lamar County, Mississippi, ratifying an accounting of the Mary B. Roper Educational Trust No. One (the “Trust”). Finding no error, we affirm. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ¶2. Randi Fuller, a beneficiary of the Trust, passed

ISHEE, J., DISSENTING: ¶83. With respect to the majority,' I must dissent on the issue of Dorothy’s standing. After Barnett’s passing, Dorothy pursued Barnett’s claims under the wrongful-death statute. The wrongful-death statute provides for a decedent’s statutory heirs to recover “all the damages of every kind to the decedent ... [including] property damages and funeral, medical, or other related exp

78 S.W.3d 730 (2002) 349 Ark. 518 THE MONEY PLACE, LLC v. Dorothy BARNES. No. 01-1374. Supreme Court of Arkansas. June 27, 2002. *732 Mixon, Parker, & Hurst, PLC, by: Donald L. Parker, II and Harry S. Hurst, Jr., Jonesboro; Wright, Lindsey & Jennings, LLP, by: Claire Shows Hancock, Little Rock, for

78 S.W.3d 714 (2002) 349 Ark. 411 THE MONEY PLACE, LLC, v. Dorothy BARNES, Individually and o/b/o a Class of Similarly Situated Persons. No. 01-1361. Supreme Court of Arkansas. June 20, 2002. *715 Mixon, Parker & Hurst, PLC, by: Donald L. Parker, II, and Harry S. Hurst, Jr., Jonesboro, for appellant.</

Ray Thornton, Justice. This caseis one of several similar cases involving check-cashing businesses using agreements containing an arbitration clause and the denial of their motions to compel arbitration. See THE/FRE, Inc. v. Martin, 349 Ark. 503, 78 S.W.3d 722 (2002); Tay-Tay, Inc. v. Young, 349 Ark. 369, 78 S.W.3d 721 (2002); The Money Place, LLC v. Barnes, 349 Ark. 411, 78 S.W.3d 714 (2002)

82 S.W.3d 162 (2002) 349 Ark. 420 F & G FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.; Cash Advance Now; Cash Advance of Jonesboro, LLC v. Dorothy BARNES and Jimmie Sue Spencer. No. 01-1376. Supreme Court of Arkansas. June 27, 2002. *164 Mixon Parker & Hurst, PLC, by Donald L. Parker, II, and Harry S. Hurst, Jr., Jones

PER CURIAM. Plaintiff-appellant Dorothy Allen filed a pro se complaint alleging that she had been fired from her job as a transcriptionist at Barnes Hospital because of her race, in violation of Title VII and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. After a one-day trial, the district court, 1 5

98 S.W.3d 558 (2002) Dorothy Christine ECHARD, Personally, and as Personal Representative of Robert L. Echard, Deceased, Respondent, v. BARNES-JEWISH HOSPITAL, Appellant. No. ED 79788. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three. August 20, 2002. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer Denied October 8, 2002. Application for Transf

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0214p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ DOROTHY BIVENS, │ Plaintiff-Appel

This is an appeal from the trial court's grant of a new trial pursuant to Rule 60(b)(2), Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure. We affirm. The plaintiffs, Rankin and Dorothy Barnes, owned a pet chow dog named Brutus. On September 10, 1987, Mrs. Barnes took the dog to the veterinary clinic owned and operated by the defendants, Dr. Ann Branch and Dr. Ben F. George, Jr. The Barneses alleged that while their pet was at the clinic, Dr. George injured the dog by kicking him. Brutus died t

390 B.R. 357 (2008) In re Dorothy Jean BLACK, Debtor. David P. Leibowitz, Trustee of the Estate of Dorothy Jean Black, Plaintiff, v. Barnes Auto Group, Inc. and Turner Acceptance Corporation, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 07 B 11416. Adversary No. 08 A 00083. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. June 23, 2008.

Barnes v Wartburg Receiver, LLC (2025 NY Slip Op 02901) Barnes v Wartburg Receiver, LLC 2025 NY Slip Op 02901 Decided on May 14, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judicia

In seven related actions, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries, Sears, Inc., a third-party defendant in action Nos. 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 and a second third-party defendant in action No. 7, appeals, as limited by its notice of appeal and brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Solomon, J.), dated October 26, 2005, as denied that branch of its motion which was for summary judgment on its cross claims for con

MEMORANDUM PER CURIAM. Movant appeals from the denial of his post-conviction motion based on Rule 29.15. He was convicted of murder in the first degree and robbery in the first degree and sentenced to concurrent terms of life imprisonment without eligibility for probation or parole for fifty years for the murder and twenty-five years for the robbery. The original conviction was affirmed in State v. Ba

TINDELL, J., FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. This appeal arises from a dispute among siblings Paul Posey and Robert Posey (collectively, the Proponents) and Dorothy Pope and Willard Posey (collectively, the Contestants) as to the validity of a 2008 will (the 2008 will) executed by their mother, Gladys Posey. Following Gladys's death in 2013, Paul submitted the 2008 will to probate and recorded t

The opinion of the court was delivered by KING, P.J.A.D. Defendants appeal from a permanent restraining order entered on September 3, 1991 limiting the place and manner of antiabortion residential picketing by defendants. The Chancery judge had entered a temporary restraining order several months earlier on April 8, 1991. See Boffard v. Barnes, 248 N.J.Super. 501, 591 A.2d 699 (Ch.Div.1991). The

PER CURIAM. *112For the reasons stated in the opinion by Wells, J., the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed. On 2 October 1991, this Court allowed the petition of the petitioner-appellant, Wayland S. Barnes, for discretionary review of the additional issue of whether certain taxes should be paid by the estate of Mildred L. Wilson or by the i

402 S.E.2d 164 (1991) Wayland S. BARNES, Individually and Executor of the Estate of Mildred L. Wilson, Petitioner, v. Ken EVANS, Marie Sterling, Ellen Northey O'Neal, Margaret Pomeroy, Virginia Smith, Pat Daly, Colerain Baptist Church, Colerain Methodist Church, Billy Graham Evangelical Association, J. Frank Wilson, Dorothy Wilson, Margaret Sterling, Kay Sterling Ellis, Ruth Bristow, Carol Barnes, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, and A

Appellants claim that the trial court erred in setting aside the decree of the probate court in the final settlement of a guardianship estate. The final settlement of the guardianship was based on the verified joint petition of Dorothy Barnes, one of the appellants and mother of the appellee, and Keith Barnes, appellee and plaintiff below, who was then 21 years of age. The joint petition prayed for final settlement by consent as authorized by Code 1975, § 26-5-12