Cases

13 So.3d 644 (2009) Sanders COLEMAN, III, Individually and as the Administrator of the Estate of his Minor Son, Xavier Coleman v. ST. TAMMANY PARISH SCHOOL BOARD and ABC Insurance Company. Terese Coleman and Sanders Coleman, III, Individually and as the Administrator of the Estate of His Minor Son, Xavier Coleman v. St. Tammany Parish School Board and ABC Insurance Company. Nos. 2008 CA 1979, 2008 CA 1980.

THIRD DIVISION DOYLE, P. J., MARKLE and PADGETT, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules May 13, 2025

OPINION ANNE GARDNER, JUSTICE The trial court denied Appellants’ motion to stay proceedings and compel arbitration. In one issue, Appellants argue the trial court erred in doing so. We agree, reverse the trial court’s order, and remand the cause for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Factual Background

Karen Lecraft Henderson, Circuit Judge: *1062 Doris Jeffries made a credit card purchase at a Centerplate 1 location and received a receipt that displayed her sixteen-digit credit card number and credit card expiration date. Jef

Jocelyn P. v. Joshua P. No. 2125, Sept. Term, 2019 Opinion by Leahy, J. Family Law > Dissolution of Marriage or Partnership > Interests in Pre-embryos Jocelyn and Joshua’s “competing interests in the disputed pre-embryo[] derive from constitutional rights in the realm of reproductive choice.” In re Marriage of Rooks, 429 P.3d 579, 586 (Colo. 2018). At its core, reproductive autonomy “is composed of two rights of equal significance—the right to procreate and the right to avoid procreation.” Davi

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON OCTOBER 1998 SESSION FILED November 2, 1998 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk STATE OF TENNESSEE, )

OPINION In this legal malpractice case, appellants appeal the trial court's take nothing summary judgment in favor of appellees.1 In *Page 290 five issues, appellants generally contend the trial court erred by granting appellees' motions for summary judgment because it (1) improperly applied the discovery rule, (2) failed to apply the Hughes

COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE PATRICIA W. GRIFFIN CHANCERY COURTHOUSE MASTER IN CHANCERY 34 The Circle GEORGETOWN, DELAWARE 19947 Date Submitted: May 17, 2022

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 717 CA 10-02322 PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND GREEN, JJ. DORIS BAITY, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT-RESPONDENT. BOND, SCHOENECK & KING, PLLC, SYRACUSE (S. PAUL BATTAGLIA OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT-RESPONDENT. FARACI LANGE, LLP

OPINION CHRISTOPHER ANTCLIFF, Justice. This is a dispute between Regina Mace Coleman and John Edmund Coleman concerning the estate of Edmund B. Coleman. The trial court granted John’s application to admit a will to probate. Regina appeals from this order. We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part. Factual and PR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE June 14, 2005 Session IN THE MATTER OF THE CONSERVATORSHIP OF DORIS DAVENPORT DORIS DAVENPORT, ET AL. v. RUTH ADAIR, ET AL. Direct Appeal from the Probate and Family Court for Cumberland County No. 14260 Steven C. Douglas, Judge No. E2004-01505-COA-R3-CV - F

KITCHENS, Justice, for the Court: ' ¶ 1. Marcus 1 and Patricia Byrd’s home, 2 located in The Timbers of Crossgates subdivision in Brandon, Mississippi, was managed by Ridgway, Lane <& Associates (Ridgway). The Byrds claimed that mold

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 03-1342 DORIS G. GRIFFIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Defendant-Appellee. ____________ Appeal from the United States Di

OPINION JEFFREY V. BROWN, Justice. In this appeal after remand, Simulis, L.L.C. complains of the trial court’s final judgment dismissing all of its claims with prejudice after the court granted the special exceptions of General Electric Capital Corporation (“GE”) and ordered Simulis to replead to assert a claim for quantum me-ruit only, but Simulis instea

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2003-CA-01955-SCT DORIS M. BLACKBURN AND STEPHEN W. BLACKBURN v. NGAN CHU WONG DATE OF JUDGMENT: 8/27/2003 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. WILLIAM G. WILLARD, JR. COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: BOLIVAR COUNTY CHANCERY COURT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANTS: ANCIL LIDDELL COX, JR.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2023-CA-01300-SCT IN RE THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF EFFIE MAE AUTRY, DECEASED: STEVE AUTRY v. MARCUS AUTRY, STEPHANIE COOPER, MICHEAL AUTRY, MARIS AUTRY, AND DORIS VANZANT DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/03/2023 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. BRADLEY D. TENNISON TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: JOE M. DAVIS JES

PER CURIAM: This is an appeal from the Tax Court of the United States. The appellants, Dr. and Mrs. Robert M. Rose, contend that they are entitled to medical deductions for the cost of food, lodging, and other living expenses of their daughter caused by seeking a climate more favorable to a serious bronchial condition. There can be

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied.

KANNE, Circuit Judge. Doris Griffin brought suit alleging in relevant part that her former employer, the United States Postal Service, discriminated against her because of her age, in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 629-34, and then retaliated when she complained, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2

PER CURIAM: In March, 1971, Doris Moore of California, Inc., appellant’s predecessor in interest, filed a trademark infringement complaint against Sherry Manufacturing Company, Inc. The issue was settled by consent decree wherein appellee was enjoined from using appellant’s trademark, a pair of bare footprints side-by-side, with the