Cases

8 Cal.4th 30 (1994) 876 P.2d 999 32 Cal. Rptr.2d 200 DORIS HELLER, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. NORCAL MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Defendants and Respondents. DORIS HELLER, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FRESNO COUNTY, Respondent; NORCAL MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Real Parties in Interest. Docket No. S034539. Supreme Court of Calif

14 Cal.App.4th 177 (1993) 17 Cal. Rptr.2d 504 THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DONALD ALAN BOX, Defendant and Appellant. Docket No. F016711. Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District. March 16, 1993. *179 COUNSEL Andre P. Gaston, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant a

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND VERDICT OF THE COURT Janis Graham Jack, Senior United States District Judge Named Plaintiffs brought this class action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against officials of the State of Texas. Plaintiffs claim that Texas violates their Fourteenth Amendment substantive due process rights, including “the right to be reasonably safe from harm while in government custody and the right to receive

94 Cal.Rptr.2d 561 (2000) 79 Cal.App.4th 1033 The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Susan Lee RUSSO, Defendant and Appellant. In re Susan Lee Russo, On Habeas Corpus. Nos. F027481, F033159. Court of Appeal, Fifth District. April 11, 2000. *562 Jim Fahey, under appointment by the Court of Appeal; Geo

John Diaz and Daniel Arenas appealed from their judgments of conviction, each having been *Page 549 found guilty after a jury trial on two counts of armed robbery, and on six counts of kidnaping for the purpose of robbery. (Pen. Code, §§ 211a, 969c, 3024 and 209.) The appeal of Arenas has been dismissed. The trial court in its abstract of judgment found that Diaz was arme

261 Cal.App.2d 149 (1968) 67 Cal. Rptr. 601 THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. RUTH ELIZABETH CHAPMAN, Defendant and Appellant. Docket No. 4665. Court of Appeals of California, Third District. April 15, 1968. *157 Richard E. Johnson, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appella

70 Cal.2d 39 (1968) THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. HERMAN YVONNE RISENHOOVER, Defendant and Appellant. Crim. No. 10708. Supreme Court of California. In Bank. Dec. 23, 1968. Molly H. Minudri, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for Defendant and Appellant. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General, Doris H. Maier, Assistant Attorney General, Edsel W

449 F.Supp.2d 1 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and Tobacco-Free Kids Action Fund, American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association, Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights, and National African American Tobacco Prevention Network, Intervenors, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., (f/k/a Philip Morris, Inc.), et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 99-2496(GK). United States Distri

This action was commenced by various plaintiffs on November 6, 1958, and recovery of damages was sought from January 1, 1956, up to the time of filing suit. The first amended complaint, upon which the request for damages and for a permanent injunction was based, sets forth *Page 56 eight causes of action against the defendants, Robert Campbell and Doris Campbell, husband and wife. Seven of these causes of action set forth that a dairy is being ope

67 Cal.App.3d 847 (1977) 136 Cal. Rptr. 429 THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JACK VALLERGA, Defendant and Appellant. Docket No. 27867. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three. February 8, 1977. *853 COUNSEL Murphy, Thornton, Hinerfeld & Cahill, Robert E. Hinerfeld

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1007 OPINION On February 11, 1970, the Grand Jury of Stanislaus County returned an indictment in the superior court of that county charging Leonard Ellsworth Miller, hereafter referred to as defendant, with murder in violation of Penal Code section 187, assault

5 Cal.3d 171 (1971) 486 P.2d 657 95 Cal. Rptr. 761 In re PRESTON R. TUCKER on Habeas Corpus. Docket No. Crim. 13489. Supreme Court of California. In Bank. June 24, 1971. *174 COUNSEL Preston R. Tucker, in pro. per., and Dorsey Redland, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for Peti

Action to contest the alleged will of Hugh W. Thomasson, deceased. The verdict sustained the will. Motion for new trial was overruled and contestants appealed. Testator had no lineal descendants, and contestants are his collateral kin (on his mother's side), second and third cousins, except Henry S. Bolles and Addison Wellborn. These two were not related to testator, but were made parties plaintiff because they were named as beneficiaries under the will. The will was executed September