⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Donnie Roscoe”

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024-09-12 · Published · cited 0× · 2024 NY Slip Op 04426
Matter of Rebecca S. v Ashley T. (2024 NY Slip Op 04426) Matter of Rebecca S. v Ashley T. 2024 NY Slip Op 04426 Decided on September 12, 2024 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to
Dorsey v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1983-01-10 · Published · cited 12× · 454 A.2d 353; 295 Md. 217; 1983 Md. LEXIS 194
295 Md. 217 (1983) 454 A.2d 353 DONNIE DORSEY AND ROSCOE DORSEY v. STATE OF MARYLAND [No. 47, September Term, 1982.] Court of Appeals of Maryland. Decided January 10, 1983. *218 The cause was argued before MURPHY, C.J., and SMITH, ELDRIDGE, COLE, DAVIDSON, RODOWSKY and COUCH, JJ. Gary W. Christop
District Court, N.D. Texas · 2015-05-08 · Published · cited 1× · 104 F. Supp. 3d 791; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60920; 2015 WL 2165921
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JANE J. BOYLE, District Judge. Following a jury verdict in favor of Plaintiffs on their Fair Labor Standard Act (“FLSA”) claims for unpaid overtime, the parties filed two post-verdict motions now before the Court: Plaintiffs’ Motion for Judgment (doc. 281) (“Plaintiffs’ Motion”) and Defendants’ Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law (doc. 283) (“Defendants’
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003-10-23 · Published · cited 25× · 834 A.2d 106; 2003 D.C. App. LEXIS 623; 2003 WL 22410650
834 A.2d 106 (2003) Michael HARRIS, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. No. 98-CF-1630. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued June 17, 2003. Decided October 23, 2003. *111 Corinne Beckwith, Public Defender Service, with whom James Klein, was on the brief, for appellant. Lisa H. Schertler, Assist
North Carolina Business Court · 2015-06-30 · Published · cited 0× · 2015 NCBC 66
Se. Air Charter, Inc. v. Stroud, 2015 NCBC 66. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION COUNTY OF LEE 11 CVS 946 SOUTHEAST AIR CHARTER, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) ROBERT BARRY STROUD, and wife, ) JE
West Virginia Court of Claims · 1986-04-30 · Published · cited 0× · 16 Ct. Cl. 79
WALLACE, JUDGE: Between 12:30 p.m. and 1:00 p.m., on July 5, 1980, Earl Jeffries, accompanied by Donnie Mcle, was operating his pickup truck in a southerly direction on Route 4 and 20, Rock Cave, Upshur County. A large tree fell over on top of the pickup truck, causing the death of the driver, Earl Jeffries, and causing claimant Donnie Mcle to be paralyzed. It is the claimants' position that the aforemention
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005-02-10 · Published · cited 21× · 867 A.2d 988; 2005 D.C. App. LEXIS 28; 2005 WL 311079
867 A.2d 988 (2005) William D. BAKER (01-CF-383), Bryant C. Woodland (01-CF-392), Jamal R. Sampson (01-CF-517), Eric T. Franklin (01-CF-520), Appellants, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. Nos. 01-CF-383, 01-CF-392, 01-CF-517 and 01-CF-520. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued January 23, 2004. Decided February 10, 2005.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980-07-11 · Published · cited 2× · 627 F.2d 293
627 F.2d 293 200 U.S.App.D.C. 240, 5 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1053 UNITED STATES of Americav.John Roscoe SLADE, a/k/a "Slave", Appellant.UNITED STATES of Americav.Odell JOHNSON, Jr., Appellant.UNITED STATES of Americav.Arthur WATSON, Jr., a/k/a "Speed", Appellant.UNITED STATES of Americav.George Norman MARSHALL, a/k/a "Little George", Appellant.UNITED STATES of Americav.
Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1998-11-25 · Published · cited 17× · 969 P.2d 200; 193 Ariz. 35; 283 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 13; 1998 Ariz. App. LEXIS 201
969 P.2d 200 (1998) 193 Ariz. 35 John G. BOLM, Plaintiff/Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. CUSTODIAN OF RECORDS OF the TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT; and the City of Tucson, Defendants/Appellants/Cross-Appellees. No. 2CA-CV 97-0182. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department A. November 25, 1998. *202 Richa
Harris v. Championpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995-03-30 · Published · cited 39× · 51 F.3d 901
51 F.3d 901 Anthony Jerome HARRIS, Gary Middaugh, Theodore Ford, DoyleKing, Randy Meyer, Terry Crisp, Michael Farmer, JohnHoneycutt, Coy Hill, Troy Brown, Deems Rowell, GordonBunton, Adam Wright, Robert Manous, Kimball Foreman, JoeHeadrick, Terry Steward, Arthur Blackmon, James Smith,Stephen Ross, Johnny Smith, Larry Brown, Walter Robinson,Roger Williams, Kenneth Owens, Marshall Gee, Kelly Craig,Gilbert Payne, Danny Gree
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999-08-19 · Published · cited 0× · 201 F.3d 602
185 F.3d 337 (5th Cir. 1999) HERB FREILER; SAM SMITH, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS CAPACITY AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF HIS MINOR CHILD STEVEN SMITH; JOHN JONES, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES,v.TANGIPAHOA PARISH BOARD OF EDUCATION; E.F. BAILEY; ROBERT CAVES; MAXINE DIXON; LEROY HART; RUTH WATSON, DONNIE WILLIAMS, SR.; ART ZIESKE, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN THEIR CAPACITIES AS MEMBERS OF THE SCHOOL BOARD; TED CASON, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS CAPACITY AS SUPE
Skidmore v. Austinpublic domain
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1964-04-29 · Published · cited 3× · 136 S.E.2d 99; 261 N.C. 713; 1964 N.C. LEXIS 578
136 S.E.2d 99 (1964) 261 N.C. 713 Eleanor Poplin SKIDMORE and husband, Harry P. Skidmore, and Lessie Poplin Carpenter, Widow, Petitioners. v. Flora Poplin AUSTIN and husband, Crawford Austin et al., Defendants. No. 455. Supreme Court of North Carolina. April 29, 1964. *100 Ernest H. Morton, Jr., Albemarle,
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999-08-19 · Published · cited 6× · 185 F.3d 337
BENAVIDES, Circuit Judge: Parents of children in the Tangipahoa Parish Public Schools brought this suit to enjoin their school board from mandating that a disclaimer be read immediately before the teaching of evolution in all elementary and secondary classes. The district court held that the disclaimer constituted an establishment of religion in violation of the First Amendment. W
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980-03-04 · Published · cited 4× · 200 U.S. App. D.C. 240; 627 F.2d 293; 5 Fed. R. Serv. 1053; 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 19976
Opinion for the Court filed by District Judge BARRINGTON D. PARKER. Concurring opinion filed by Senior Circuit Judge BAZELON. BARRINGTON D. PARKER, District Judge: In 1977, the government conducted an extensive investigation of a suspected heroin sales ring operating in Washington, D. C. The investigation, conducted by local and federal undercover agents with the assistance of paid informa
District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2004-06-18 · Published · cited 3× · 343 F. Supp. 2d 546; 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23591; 2004 WL 2651254
343 F.Supp.2d 546 (2004) James M. COX, et al. Plaintiffs v. CITY OF JACKSON, A Municipal Corporation Defendant No. 3:94-CV-623WS. United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Jackson Division. June 18, 2004. *552 Edward P. Lobrano, Jr., Lobrano, Butler & Kirk, Ridgeland, MS, for plaintiffs. Paul M. Neville, Neville
People v. Gilbertpublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 1992-04-29 · Published · cited 75× · 5 Cal. App. 4th 1372; 7 Cal. Rptr. 2d 660; 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3702; 92 Daily Journal DAR 5811; 1992 Cal. App. LEXIS 566
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1374 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1375 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPL
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018-09-13 · Published · cited 314× · 903 F.3d 1090
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL CAMPBELL; et al, * No. 15-56990 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. 2:04-cv-08592- AG-AJW CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-Appellee. CESAR MATA,
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994-01-26 · Published · cited 165× · 15 F.3d 1538; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 1257
15 F.3d 1538 Anthony Jerome HARRIS, Gary Middaugh, Theodore Ford, DoyleKing, Randy Meyer, Terry Crisp, Michael Farmer, JohnHoneycutt, Coy Hill, Troy Brown, Deems Rowell, GordonBunton, Adam Wright, Robert Manous, Kimball Foreman, JoeHeadrick, Terry Steward, Arthur Blackmon, James Smith,Stephen Ross, Johnny Smith, Larry Brown, Walter Robinson,Roger Williams, Kenneth Owens, Marshall Gee, Kelly Craig,Gilbert Payne, Danny Gre
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2015-12-23 · Published · cited 0×
1 @»-~/~/5~004<@@@\/ IN THE FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS F\L\=_o \N PEALS IN THE 'sTATE oF TEXAS b `SWCURTOFAP HOUS"'OM_ TEXAS In the Estate of Michael Edward Schied, DEC 2 3 205 Deceased CHNST H .~ - ‘NE y D'a`V-id Schied, Case No. 434875 CLERK Interested Party Plaintiff/ Principal Co-Heir vs M'ichael Merritt (named “ex_ecutor”) and Wynde Merritt (“co-executor” by Janette Renee Smith proxy) Robin Apostolakis David Munson Co-Defendants/Appellees CERTIFICATE OF SERVIC
Harris v. Championpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995-03-30 · Published · cited 18× · 51 F.3d 901; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 6470
BRORBY, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs-appellants, all of whom were convicted of felonies in Oklahoma and were represented by defendant-appellee Oklahoma Indigent Defense System (OIDS) on their direct appeals in state court, brought suit asserting habeas and civil rights claims against defendants-appellees as a result of allegedly unconstitutional delay by the state in adjudicating plaintiffs’ direct criminal appeals. Plaintiffs