Cases

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. CASANUEVA, MORRIS, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. CASANUEVA, MORRIS, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.

People v Tolbert (2023 NY Slip Op 01549) People v Tolbert 2023 NY Slip Op 01549 Decided on March 23, 2023 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT GERALD ELICIOUS TOLBERT, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-02-00501-CV Ahmed Crowley, Appellant v. Donna Lenita Hinson-Crowley, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 53RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. FM202120, HONORABLE SUZANNE COVINGTON, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-02-00501-CV Ahmed Crowley, Appellant v.

Andrews, Judge. In Emmons v. City of Arcade, 270 Ga. 196 (507 SE2d 464) (1998), the Supreme Court affirmed in part and reversed in part the judgment of this Court in City of Arcade v. Emmons, 228 Ga. App. 879 (494 SE2d 186) (1997), which was a consolidation of the appeals in Case Nos. A97A1002 and A97A1334. As to the issues raised in Case No. A97A1002, the Supreme Court partially reversed this Court and aff

407 So.2d 815 (1981) Donna S. TOLBERT v. STATE of Mississippi. No. 52925. Supreme Court of Mississippi. December 16, 1981. Richard E. Stratton, III, Brookhaven, for appellant. Bill Allain, Atty. Gen. by Carolyn B. Mills, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee. *816 Before SMITH, P.J., and WALKER and BOWLING, JJ

494 S.E.2d 186 (1997) 228 Ga. App. 879 CITY OF ARCADE v. EMMONS et al. (Two Cases). Nos. A97A1002, A97A1334. Court of Appeals of Georgia. October 9, 1997. Reconsideration Denied October 22, 1997. Certiorari Granted March 6, 1998. *187 Schreeder, Wheeler & Flint, David

486 S.E.2d 359 (1997) CITY OF ARCADE v. EMMONS et al. No. S97A0032. Supreme Court of Georgia. June 30, 1997. Reconsideration Denied July 17, 1997. *360 David H. Flint, Mark W. Forsling, Schreeder, Wheeler & Flint, L.L.P., Atlanta, Donna S. Golden, Jefferson, for City of Arcade. David Charles Moss, Deck

AVR Carle Place Associates, LLC, Doing Business as Homewood Carle Place, Respondent, againstDonna Rosu-Almazon, Appellant. Donna Rosu-Almazon, appellant pro se. Jay A. Marshall, Esq., for respondent. Appeal from an order of the District Court of Nassau County, First District (Eric Bjorneby, J.), dated June 26, 2015. The order denied tenant's motion to, in effect, vacate a

The People of the State of New York, Appellant, againstMichael McCarthy, Respondent. Nassau County District Attorney (Daniel Bresnahan and Amanda Manning of counsel), for appellant. Barket Epstein & Kearon, LLP (Donna Aldea of counsel), for respondent. Appeal from an order of the District Court of Nassau County, First District (Helen Voutsinas, J.), dated December 22,

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, againstJames Moran, Appellant. James Moran, appellant pro se. Oyster Bay Town Attorney's Office (Donna B. Swanson of counsel), for respondent. Appeal from two judgments of the District Court of Nassau County, Fourth District (Joseph Girardi, J.), rendered August 8, 2016. The judgments, after a nonjury trial, convicted defen

HENDRY, Judge. Plaintiff Lou Poller, individually and as General Partner for Landmark Plaza Associates and Landmark Palace Associates, and counterplaintiff Rose Poller appeal from a final judgment and two additional orders entered against them in a non-jury trial of their lawsuit seeking damages, an accounting, rescission and injunctive relief. The first order appealed is an order granting defendant Nova

*889Proceeding pursuant to Executive Law § 298 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County [John W. Grow, J.], entered July 6, 2005) to review a determination of respondent New York State Division of Human Rights. The determination found after a public hearing, among other things, that petitioner discrimi

Larry Franklin Beverly ("the father") and Helen Patricia S. Beverly ("the mother") were divorced pursuant to a January 11, 2001, judgment of the trial court. The divorce judgment, which incorporated an agreement reached by the parties, provided in relevant part that the mother was awarded custody of the minor child of the marriage and that the father was to pay monthly child support. The child-support provision of the divorce judgment specifically noted that the parties' child, whose

OSCN Found Document:IN RE THE ESTATE OF JAMES IN RE THE ESTATE OF JAMES2020 OK 7Case Number: 115514; Cons. w/115516Decided: 01/28/2020THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2020 OK 7, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHD

OSCN Found Document:IN RE THE ESTATE OF JAMES IN RE THE ESTATE OF JAMES2020 OK 7Case Number: 115514; Cons. w/115516Decided: 01/28/2020THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2020 OK 7, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR

TERRI F. LOVE, Judge. _JjThe defendant seeks review of his conviction for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and his sentence as a multiple offender. The defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying his Batson challenge, denying his Motion to Sever or denying the Motion for Mistrial, and for not ruling on his Motion for New Trial. We find that the State of Louisiana provided race-neutral reason

OSCN Found Document:IN RE THE ESTATE OF JAMES IN RE THE ESTATE OF JAMES2020 OK 7Case Number: 115514; Cons. w/115516Decided: 01/28/2020As Corrected: February 3, 2020THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2020 OK 7, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED,