⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Donna Rae Foster”

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2015-10-27 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs March 11, 2015 ROBERT JOHN SKOWRONSKI v. DONNA RAE WADE Appeal from the Chancery Court for Montgomery County No. DI03266 Ross H. Hicks, Judge ________________________________ No. M2014-01501-COA-R3-CV – Filed October 27, 2015 _____________________________
California Supreme Court · 2002-12-02 · Published · cited 79× · 58 P.3d 367; 127 Cal. Rptr. 2d 516; 29 Cal. 4th 345; 2002 Daily Journal DAR 13480; 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 11573; 2002 Cal. LEXIS 8100
127 Cal.Rptr.2d 516 (2002) 29 Cal.4th 345 58 P.3d 367 Timothy L. SMITH, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. RAE-VENTER LAW GROUP, Defendant and Appellant. No. S098760. Supreme Court of California. December 2, 2002. *519 Timothy L. Smith, in pro. per. Law Offices of Ellen Lake, Ellen
California Court of Appeal · 2001-08-29 · Published · cited 0× · 106 Cal. Rptr. 2d 873; 89 Cal. App. 4th 239
106 Cal.Rptr.2d 873 (2001) 89 Cal.App.4th 239 Timothy L. SMITH, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. RAE-VENTER LAW GROUP, Defendant and Appellant. No. H018775. Court of Appeal, Sixth District. May 21, 2001. Review Granted August 29, 2001. *877 Timothy L. Smith, in pro. per., Gregg L. Kays, Norland
Kraft v. Ramospublic domain
North Dakota Supreme Court · 2012-05-17 · Published · cited 0× · 816 N.W.2d 793; 2012 ND 104; 2012 WL 1727630; 2012 N.D. LEXIS 93
MARING, Justice. [¶ 1] Donna M. Kraft, the personal representative for the estate of Emma Boehm, appeals from the trial court’s order recognizing Alicia Rae Ramos as a devisee under the estate of Emma Boehm. We hold Ramos is a proper devisee under Emma Boehm’s will and affirm the trial court’s May 17, 2011, order and its February 17, 2012, opinion on the motion to reconsider in which it concluded William Boehm functioned as a
Nebraska Supreme Court · 2019-05-24 · Published · cited 150× · 303 Neb. 245; 928 N.W.2d 398
Cassel, J. INTRODUCTION After Trevor W. commenced a modification proceeding in the district court, Christine W. counterclaimed to terminate Trevor's parental rights and obtained an order transferring the proceeding to the county court, sitting as a juvenile court. But when the proceeding reached the juvenile court, it "denie[d]" the transfer and purportedly returne
Nebraska Supreme Court · 2019-05-24 · Published · cited 7× · 303 Neb. 245
Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 08/16/2019 12:07 AM CDT - 245 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 303 Nebraska R eports CHRISTINE W. v. TREVOR W. Cite as 303 Neb. 245 Christine W., appella
Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2020-09-02 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 19-0465 Filed September 2, 2020 CHRISTOPHER LEGEAR, Applicant-Appellant, vs. STATE OF IOWA, Respondent-Appellee. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Pottawattamie County, Kathleen A. Kilnoski, Judge. Petitioner appeals the summary dismissal of his third postconviction-reli
State v. Sandovalpublic domain
North Dakota Supreme Court · 2012-05-17 · Published · cited 1× · 2012 ND 95
Filed 5/17/12 by Clerk of Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2012 ND 104 In the Matter of the Estate of Emma Boehm, Deceased Donna M. Kraft, Personal </
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988-01-25 · Published · cited 3× · 536 A.2d 809; 370 Pa. Super. 404; 1988 Pa. Super. LEXIS 59
370 Pa. Superior Ct. 404 (1988) 536 A.2d 809 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. John Richard LOHMAN, Appellant. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued October 29, 1987. Filed January 25, 1988. *405 Craig P. Miller, Lock Haven, for appellant. Donna L. Rae, Assistant District Attorney, Lock Haven, for Com
In re Daniel F.public domain
California Court of Appeal · 2021-05-24 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 5/24/21 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE In re DANIEL F., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. ALAMEDA COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES AGENCY, Plaintiff and Respondent, A160929 v. (Alameda County DANIEL F. et al.,
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lycoming County · 1992-05-08 · Published · cited 0× · 19 Pa. D. & C.4th 399; 1992 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 28
BROWN, J., Several motions for discovery are before the court as a result of an action for medical malpractice in which an interpretation of the Peer Review Protection Act, 63 P.S. §425.1 et. seq., has become necessary. Plaintiff has requested the production of certain documents and answers to interrogatories, and a clear delineation of the privilege extended by the PRPA is required to determine what is discoverable. Th
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2005-02-17 · Published · cited 0×
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-04-00569-CV Jamie Ross, Appellant <
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008-09-16 · Published · cited 18× · 2008 OK 80; 195 P.3d 896; 2008 Okla. LEXIS 86; 2008 WL 4272177
2008 OK 80 IN THE MATTER OF BTW, Deprived child under the age of eighteen (18) years. No. 105671. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. September 16, 2008. Susan K. Meinders, Office of the District Attorney of Woodward County, Woodward, Oklahoma, for the State of Oklahoma. Jean L. Foard, Carelyn Stuckey Talley, Foard, Talley & Stake, P.L.L.C., Woodward, Oklahoma, for the ch
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2005-02-17 · Published · cited 0×
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-04-00569-CV Jamie Ross, Appellant v. Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY, 51ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. A-03-0053-CPS, HONORABLE RAE LEIFESTE, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORA
Araujo v. Araujopublic domain
Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2017-07-18 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE NEBRASKA COURT OF APPEALS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ON APPEAL (Memorandum Web Opinion) ARAUJO V. ARAUJO NOTICE: THIS OPINION IS NOT DESIGNATED FOR PERMANENT PUBLICATION AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY NEB. CT. R. APP. P. § 2-102(E). DENA M. ARAUJO, APPELLANT, V.
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana · 2007-03-05 · Published · cited 12× · 363 B.R. 591; 2007 Bankr. LEXIS 719; 2007 WL 678341
363 B.R. 591 (2007) In re Daniel Edward BROWN, and Shirley Ann Brown, Debtors. Thomas E. Boland, Plaintiff, v. Darcy M. Crum, Joseph V. Womack, Richard J. Samson, William M. Kebe, Jr., Ross P. Richardson, Gary S. Deschenes, Donald W. Torgenrud, Jr., Robert G. Drummond, Daniel Edward Brown, Shirley Ann Brown, James A Patten, Sharon R. Pruitt, Earl D. Pruitt, Laura J. Sandstrom, Clayton J. Arceneaux, Kenneth Johnson, Brandi L. Hazen, Gayle Ride
District Court, S.D. New York · 2007-03-26 · Published · cited 1× · 478 F. Supp. 2d 624
478 F.Supp.2d 624 (2007) In re EPHEDRA PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. Pertains To Stafford v. Weight Watchers Inc. et al, No. 05 Civ. 3021. No. 04 M.D. 1598(JSR). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 26, 2007. *625 *626 Anne Andrews, Andrews Kurth LLP, Dallas, TX, Catherine T
State v. Shaferpublic domain
Washington Supreme Court · 2006-02-09 · Published · cited 53× · 128 P.3d 87
128 P.3d 87 (2006) STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Stoney Daye SHAFER, Appellant. No. 75605-8. Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. Argued June 30, 2005. Decided February 9, 2006. *88 Lenell Rae Nussbaum, Attorney at Law, Seattle, for Petitioner/Appellant. Gerald Allen Horne, Kathleen Proctor, John Ma
Wyoming Supreme Court · 1995-08-25 · Published · cited 4× · 901 P.2d 1107; 1995 WL 503876
901 P.2d 1107 (1995) H. Douglas MILLER and Danene R. Miller, individually and as conservator(s) of Laura K. Miller, Lindy L. Miller and Clint T. Miller, minors; Steve Adams and Peggy Adams, individually and as conservator(s) of Christie Adams and Jamie Adams, minors; Scott G. Anderson and Tobey J. Anderson, individually and as conservator(s) of Michael Todd Anderson, Chanel S. Anderson, and Tobin P. Anderson, minors; Paul D. Bailey, Jr.; Roxanne G. Randa
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2015-05-07 · Published · cited 0× · 2015 Ark. 200
Cite as 2015 Ark. 200 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS IN RE SUSPENSIONS OF Opinion Delivered May 7, 2015 ATTORNEYS WHO FAILED TO PAY ANNUAL ATTORNEY-LICENSE FEE PER CURIAM On May 14, 2014, we held unconstitutional former Rule VII(C) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar to the extent the former rule provided for the suspension of attorneys