Cases

*138 OPINION OF THE COURT ALITO, Circuit Judge: Donna K. Gade and her mother filed a three-count complaint in federal court based on diversity of citizenship, seeking to recover damages resulting from an automobile accident with a vehicle operated by defendant Istvan (Steven) J. Cs

CASPER, District Judge. I. Introduction A putative class of retail electricity consumers residing in New England (collectively, "Plaintiffs") have filed this lawsuit against Eversource Energy ("Eversource") and Avangrid, Inc. ("Avangrid") (collectively, "Defendants"), alleging violations of the Sherman Act,

Lenk, J. The wife, Donna Wolcott, appeals from that portion of the parties’ divorce judgment that divides the marital assets, essentially arguing that the judge abused his discretion in awarding the husband, Jeffrey Wolcott, what amounts to ninety percent of the marital estate. She also appeals from the judge’s denial of her request for attorney’s fees. We affirm. Background. What follows are the re

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS DEBORAH J. GREER, DIANA § ELIZABETH MACY, MARVIN No. 08-15-00040-CV GREER, JR. AND MAP2004, LLC § D/B/A MAP2004-OK, WOLF BONE Appeal from the 143rd RANCH PARTNERS LLC, SAPPHIRE § ROYALTIES, INC., STEPHEN District Court FLANAGAN, TRUSTEE OF THE § MIDLAND TRUST, JOHN G. of R

OPINION STEVEN L. HUGHES, Justice In this permissive appeal we are asked to construe a 1927 mineral deed. The 1927 deed is only seven paragraphs long, and no party claims it is ambiguous. But, the parties have widely different interpretations concerning what interests the deed conveyed and the size of those interests. The Appellants are the successors in

122 Wis.2d 427 (1984) 362 N.W.2d 443 STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. William BELL, Defendant-Appellant.[†] No. 84-194. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. Submitted on briefs November 6, 1984. Decided December 12, 1984. For the defendant-appellant, the cause was submitted or the briefs of Donna L. Hintze

910 P.2d 890 (1996) Marguerite BOLAND; Thomas F. and Ruth Corbally; Brian Birkenbuel; Harry and Ruth Gardner; Jeannie and William Jupka; Mary Laird; Winona and Hilmuth Kruckenberg; Minnie Isler; Edward and Suzanne Merlo; Susan Boland; Richard and Donna Osweiler; William and Charlene Kitto; and Betty McGavin, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY OF GREAT FALLS, Montana, Defendant and Respondent, and Top Gun, Inc., Intervenor/Defendant and Respon

406 B.R. 812 (2009) In re William J. LUNKES, Debtor. No. 09 B 00583. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. July 2, 2009. *813 John K. Kneafsey of Nisen & Elliott LLC, Chicago, IL, for Debtor. Zane L. Zielinski of Frank/Gecker LLP, Chicago, IL, for the Chapter 7 Trustee.

PER CURIAM. Following the denial of its motions to disqualify the trial judge, Shands Teaching Hospital and Climes, Inc., (“Shands”), petitions this court for prohibition relief. We previously consolidated these cases for purposes of assigning them to the same panel of judges, and now consolidate them for disposition in this opinion. During the trial of a medical negligence action styled as Dunn v. Sh

Cite as 2021 Ark. 199 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-19-786 Opinion Delivered: November 4, 2021 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF APPEAL FROM THE LEE COUNTY ROBERT H. SLAUGHTER, DECEASED CIRCUIT COURT [NO. 39PR-16-8] GARLAND TRICE, JR. APPELLANT HO

378 F.Supp.2d 1258 (2005) Kathleen HSIUNG, et al., Plaintiff, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU, a municipal corporation of the State of Hawaii, Defendant. No. CV 05-00104DAE-LEK. United States District Court, D. Hawai`i. July 19, 2005. *1259 Martin Anderson, Joachim P. Cox, Robert K. Fricke, Goodsill Anderson Quinn & Stifel LLL

This is a civil action instituted 7 February, 1946, by the plaintiffs under the provisions of the Uniform Declaratory Judgment Act, G.S., 1-253,et seq., for the purpose of obtaining a construction of the last will and testament of Jesse Phillips, late of the County of Greene, which will was duly probated in March, 1925. Jesse Phillips died seized of a tract of land situate in Greene County, N.C. near the Town of Hookerton, and being the lands

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-14-00694-CV Robert LEAL and Ramiro Leal, Appellants v. CUANTO ANTES MEJOR LLC, Appell

926 So.2d 441 (2006) SHANDS TEACHING HOSPITAL AND CLINICS, INC., Petitioner, v. Tatianna SAMUEL, a minor, by and through her parents and natural guardians, Janicka MATHIS and Kina Mathis, Janicka Mathis and Kina Mathis, individually, Rene Rivera-Santiago, and Cardiovascular Perfusionists, Inc., Respondents. Shands Teaching Hospital and Clinics, Inc., Petitioner, v. Wesley Webster, Florida Board of Education, Body Dynamics, Inc., d/b/a

427 B.R. 425 (2010) William J. LUNKES and James A. Lunkes, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Frances GECKER, not individually but as the Chapter 7 trustee of the bankruptcy estates of William J. Lunkes and James A. Lunkes, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 09 C 4589, 09 C 4694. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. March 29, 2010.

591 F.3d 613 (2010) In re PREMPRO PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION, *614 Sandra Kirkland; Patricia Lawton-Wilson; Monica Lee; Katherine Maiello; Dorothy Mallette; Nola McAdoo; Lillian Meeks; Brenda Nicholson; Joanne Nickel; Barbara Norvell; Reva Orr; Regina Parker; April Patterson; Kathleen Perkinson; Donna Peters; Joanne Peterson; Mary Phillips; Viola Plieseis; Joyce Podhayski; Kathleen Preston; Lydia Ross; Diane S

LOUIS B. BUTLER, JR., J. ¶ 88. (concurring). I join the majority opinion with respect to its conclusion that territorial jurisdiction is satisfied in this matter. While I generally agree with the sentiments expressed by Justice Bradley's concurrence that the residual hearsay exception should he sparingly used, Justice Bradley's concurrence, ¶ 85, I nevertheless share the majority's conclusion that Patricia Ellifson's testimony

418 Mass. 523 (1994) 638 N.E.2d 9 COMMONWEALTH vs. WILLIAM BARNOSKI. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Middlesex. April 6, 1994. August 3, 1994. Present: LIACOS, C.J., ABRAMS, NOLAN, & LYNCH, JJ. Rosemary Curran Scapicchio for the defendant. Marguerite T. Grant, Assistant District Attorney, for the Commo

OAKES, Senior Circuit Judge: This appeal raises a simple issue of statutory interpretation, but is set in a complex factual and legal background. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), Megan-Racine Associates, Inc. (“Megan”), and Hudson Engineering Corp. (“Hudson”) appeal a Memorandum-Decision and Order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, Rosemary S. Pooler, Judge, </

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES 0. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Vanderbilt Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Complaint, filed August 31, 2010 (Doc. 36); (ii) the Individual State Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Claims, filed August 31, 2010 (Doc. 41); and (iii) the Motion of the Educational Retirement Fund to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Claims Und