Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Donna Denise Scott”
Sonya Denise Patterson v. Mississippi Department of Employment Security and Valerie Scott Insurancepublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2019-CC-00977-COA SONYA DENISE PATTERSON APPELLANT v. MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF APPELLEES EMPLOYMENT SECURITY AND VALERIE SCOTT INSURANCE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/03/2019 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. KELLY LEE MIMS COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: ALCOR
Scott v. Behavioral Research Associates, Inc.public domain
43 A.3d 925 (2012) Denise C. SCOTT, Petitioner, v. BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC., Respondent. No. 10-AA-1465. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Submitted December 16, 2011. Decided May 17, 2012. *927 Denise C. Scott, pro se. Donna MP Wilson, Bowie, MD, was on the brief for respondent. Be
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ Case No. 6D2024-0576 Lower Tribunal No. 2019-CA-005811-O _____________________________ SCOTT URBAN and DONNA URBAN, Appellants, v. WALT DISNEY PARKS AND RESORTS US, INC.,
Denise DeMartini v. Town of Gulf Streampublic domain
Case: 17-14177 Date Filed: 11/21/2019 Page: 1 of 73 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 17-14177 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 9:16-cv-81371-DMM DENISE DEMARTINI,
Keenan v. Scott Township Authoritypublic domain
151 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 225 (1992) 616 A.2d 751 John B. KEENAN, Joanne I. Keenan, James R. Wolfer, Donna M. Houghtailing, Dennis H. Hattersley, Thomas J. Kiniry, Marian K. Kiniry, Betty S. Dollman, Samuel B. Kuhn, Miriam E. Kuhn, Daniel W. Morrison, Sharon M. Morrison, William R. Kennedy III, Renata A. Kennedy, James F. Bower, Mary K. Bower, M. Hagan Manning, F. Denise Manning, Christopher P. Lewis, Amy G. Lewis, Samuel B. Slike,
Walker v. Blairpublic domain
Opinion of the Court by Chief Justice MINTON. The United States Supreme Court in Troxel v. Granville1 addressed the federal constitutional implications of state statutes that allow courts to grant non-parent visitation with children over parental objections. A majority of that Court recognized that parents have a constitutionally protected liberty interest in rearing their
Mooradian v. FCA US, LLCpublic domain
JAMES S. GWIN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE: Defendant FCA US, LLC ("FCA") requests that the Court sanction Plaintiff White and his counsel for spoliating evidence.1 FCA manufactures Chrysler automobiles, including Jeep Wranglers. Plaintiffs oppose the sanction motion, arguing that no spoliation occurred.2 For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANT
Scott v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.public domain
17-2208, 18-359 Scott v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2018 (Argued: February 13, 2019 Decided: April 1, 2020) Nos. 17-2208-cv, 18-359-cv MAXCIMO SCOTT, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, JAY FRANCIS ENSOR, CHRISTIN
Community Care, LLC v. Leavittpublic domain
537 F.3d 546 (2008) COMMUNITY CARE, LLC, doing business as Community Care Hospital, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael O. LEAVITT, Secretary, Department of Health & Human Services, Defendant-Appellee. No. 07-30306. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. July 29, 2008. Nancy Scott Degan, Donna D. Fraiche (argued), Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Ber
Community Care, L.L.C. v. Leavittpublic domain
477 F.Supp.2d 751 (2007) COMMUNITY CARE, L.L.C. v. Michael O. LEAVITT, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services. Civil Action No. 05-3768. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. February 27, 2007. *752 Nancy Scott Degan, Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC, Margaret McAlister Silverstein, Mo
Scott v. Moserpublic domain
229 S.E.2d 222 (1976) 31 N.C. App. 268 Sallie M. SCOTT (widow) et al., Plaintiffs, v. Ruby Juanita Scott MOSER et al., Defendants. No. 7617DC304. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. November 3, 1976. *225 Folger & Folger by Fred Folger, Jr., and Larry Bowman, Mount Airy, for plaintiffs-appellees. <
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-19-00212-CV Texas State University President Denise M. Trauth; Texas State University Assistant Vice President for Research and Federal Relations Michael Blanda; Texas State University Registrar Louis E. Jimenez, Jr.; and Texas State University Regents William F. Scott, David Montagne, Charlie Amato, Duke Austin, Garry Crain, Veronica Muzquiz Edwards, Dionicio Flores, Nicki Harle, and Ala
Moody v. A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc.public domain
847 P.2d 215 (1992) Donna L. MOODY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. A.G. EDWARDS & SONS, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant-Appellee. No. 91CA1762. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. V. December 3, 1992. Rehearing Denied January 14, 1993. A. Daniel Rooney, Aurora, for plaintiff-appellant. *216 Holland &
Cohen v. Arthur Andersen, L.L.P.public domain
106 S.W.3d 304 (2003) Debra Faye Rashti COHEN, Donna Kaye Rashti, Denise Jaye Rashti, and Michael Rashti, Appellants, v. ARTHUR ANDERSEN, L.L.P., Bradley A. Roe, Ted E. McElroy, and D. Stephen Goddard, Appellees. No. 01-02-00151-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist.). May 1, 2003. *305 Daniel J. Petroski, Vahldiek, Ca
August 20, 2013 JUDGMENT The Fourteenth Court of Appeals GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING AND ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellants V. TAMMYLERN CURRY, RICHARD SZYMANSKI, ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF MARION SZYMANSKI, EMILIE WHITEHEAD, CONNIE BOHANNON, AND LINDA SCOTT, Appellees NO. 14-11-01093-CV NO. 14-12-00300-CV GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING AND ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellants V. ALVAREZ, CAROLYN B., AMAN, MARIA
Edward Schad v. Charles Ryanpublic domain
OPINION PER CURIAM: Plaintiff-Appellant Edward Schad is scheduled to be executed on October 9, 2013, in Arizona for the 1978 murder of Lorimer Grove. His efforts to reopen the district court’s 2006 habeas judgment by invoking Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) have been the subject of another appeal, No. 13-16895, in a separate district court action.
Little Rock School District v. Arkansaspublic domain
674 F.3d 990 (2012) LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, Appellant, v. State of ARKANSAS; Arkansas Department of Education, Appellees. *991 Lorene Joshua; Leslie Joshua; Stacy Joshua; Wayne Joshua, Appellees, v. Pulaski County Special School District, Appellant, Arkansas Department of Education, Appellee. Alexa Armstrong; Karlos Armstrong; Khayyam Davis; Alvin Hudson; Tatia Hudson; Lorene Joshua;
Duff Truck Lines, Inc. v. Vezollespublic domain
OPINION McANULTY, Judge. The issue in this appeal is whether an attorney who successfully defended an employee’s claim for medical expenses in a reopening of a workers’ compensation settlement is entitled to an attorney fee. We have reviewed the applicable law, and affirm the opinion of the Workers’ Compensation Board (hereinafter, the Board) which held that the- award of attorney fees was appr
People v. Scott K.public domain
156 Cal.App.3d 273 (1984) 203 Cal. Rptr. 268 In re SCOTT K., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. SCOTT K., Defendant and Appellant. Docket No. G000368. Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three. May 23, 1984. *274 COUNSEL R
Little Rock School District v. Arkansaspublic domain
664 F.3d 738 (2011) LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, Appellant, v. State of ARKANSAS; Arkansas Department of Education, Appellees. Lorene Joshua; Leslie Joshua; Stacy Joshua; Wayne Joshua, Appellees, v. Pulaski County Special School District, Appellant, Arkansas Department of Education, Appellee. Alexa Armstrong; Karlos Armstrong; Khayyam Davis; Alvin Hudson; Tatia Hudson; Lorene Joshua; Leslie Joshua; Stacy Joshua; Wayne Joshua;