Cases

14 N.Y.3d 46 (2009) 924 N.E.2d 336 897 N.Y.S.2d 382 2009 NY Slip Op 9314 In the Matter of CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Appellants, v. PATROLMEN'S BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, INC., et al., Defendants and SERGEANTS' BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents. No. 205 Court of Appeals of New

OPINION OF THE COURT Tom, J. Petitioners contend that a change in the method of random drug testing utilized by the New York City Police Department (NYPD) for the screening of police officers—from urinalysis to hair analysis—is exempt from collective bargaining because it involves the disciplinary authority of the Police Commissioner, as conferred by New York City Charter § 434 and Administrative Code of

803 A.2d 962 (2002) Harold FISHER, Appellant, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellee. No. 00-CV-41. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued December 6, 2000. Decided July 25, 2002. William Herrington, for appellant. Donna M. Murasky, Senior Assistant Corporation Counsel, with whom Robert R. Rigsby, Corporation Counsel, and Charles L. Reische

942 F.Supp. 684 (1996) EASTERN ENTERPRISES, Plaintiff, v. Donna E. SHALALA et al., Defendants. C.A. No. 93-12372-WF. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. March 30, 1996. *685 John T. Montgomery, William L. Patton, Ropes & Gray, Boston, MA, David Martland, Hutchins, Wheeler & Dittmar, Boston, MA, Rosa C. Hallowe

538 A.2d 170 (1987) Donna R. LEWIS v. Victor R. LEWIS, St. Johnsbury Fruit Co. and Vermont Mutual Insurance Co. No. 85-183. Supreme Court of Vermont. December 4, 1987. *171 Steven A. Adler of Gensburg & Axelrod, St. Johnsbury, for plaintiff-appellee. Swainbank, Morrissette, Neylon & Hickey, St. Johnsbury, for defen

*210 OPINION OF THE COURT SLOVITER, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal by Sherman Kendis, pro se, from the order of the district court denying his motion for reconsideration of the court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to Fed.R. Crim.P. 35. Kendis, an at

People v Tannen (2020 NY Slip Op 02285) People v Tannen 2020 NY Slip Op 02285 Decided on April 16, 2020 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 4

Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v Vista Holding, LLC (2025 NY Slip Op 03707) Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v Vista Holding, LLC 2025 NY Slip Op 03707 Decided on June 18, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary L

94 N.Y.2d 253 (1999) 723 N.E.2d 555 701 N.Y.S.2d 700 In the Matter of GREGORY BALCERAK, Respondent, v. COUNTY OF NASSAU, Appellant. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Argued November 17, 1999. Decided December 16, 1999. *254 Bee, Eisman & Ready, Mineola (Peter

126 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 27 (1989) 558 A.2d 192 Thomas WALSH, Jr., Appellant, v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, Appellee. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, Appellant, v. Thomas WALSH, Jr., Appellee. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Argued December 13, 1988. Decided May 12, 1989. *28 Edward F. Chacker, Daniel J.

163 B.R. 955 (1993) In re CHATEAUGAY CORPORATION, Roemar, Inc., The LTV Corporation, et al., Debtors. LTV STEEL COMPANY, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Donna E. SHALALA, et al., Defendants. Nos. 86 B 11270 (BRL)-86 B 11334 (BRL), 86 B 11402 (BRL) and 86 B 11464 (BRL). No. 93 Civ. 0554 (JSM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. December 15, 1993.

95 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 285 (1986) 505 A.2d 385 Joan McCreary, Appellant v. City of Philadelphia, Appellee. No. 60 T.D. 1984. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. February 26, 1986. Argued December 10, 1985. Before President Judge CRUMLISH, JR., Judge BARRY, and Senior Judge BLATT, sitting as a panel of three.

OPINION OF THE COURT SLOVITER, Circuit Judge. On this, direct appeal from the district court’s denial of defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment on double jeopardy grounds 726 F.Supp. 991, we must decide whether acquittal on a RICO charge bars subsequent prosecution on the predicate acts. This presents the mirror image of the question that we decided in

174 B.R. 722 (1994) In re BLUE DIAMOND COAL COMPANY, Debtor. BLUE DIAMOND COAL COMPANY v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, and . . . Trustees of the United Mine Workers' of America Combined Benefit Fund. No. CIV-3-93-473. United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Knoxville. November 9, 1994. *723

Matter of P. & E. T. Found. (2022 NY Slip Op 02730) Matter of P. & E. T. Found. 2022 NY Slip Op 02730 Decided on April 22, 2022 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judic

OPINION and ORDER OF COURT AMBROSE, District Judge. This action for declaratory and injunctive relief challenges the constitutionality of the Coal Industry Retiree Health Benefit Act of 1992, 26 U.S.C.A. §§ 9701-9722 (Supp.1995) (the “Coal Act”), as applied to Plaintiff Lindsey Coal Mining Company Liquidating Trust, also known as Lindsey Coal

882 F.Supp. 799 (1995) TEMPLETON COAL COMPANY, INC., Sherwood-Templeton Coal Company, Inc., Princeton Mining Company, and Berwind Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant. United Mine Workers of America Combined Benefit Fund and its Trustees, Marty D. Hudson, Michael Holland, Elliot A. Segal, Thomas O.S. Rand, Carlton R. Sickles, Gail R. Willensky, and William P.

855 F.Supp. 990 (1993) TEMPLETON COAL COMPANY, INC., Sherwood-Templeton Coal Company, Inc., Princeton Mining Company, and Berwind Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services, United Mine Workers of America Combined Benefit Fund and its Trustees, Marty D. Hudson, Michael Holland, Elliot A. Segal, Thomas O.S. Rand, Carlton R. Sickles, Gail R. Willensky, and William P. Hobgood, Defen

MOORE, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-Appellant Blue Diamond Coal Company (“Blue Diamond”) appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants-Appellees Donna E. Shalala, Secretary of Health and Human Services (the “Secretary”), and the Trustees of the United Mine Workers of America Combined Benefit Fund (the “Trustees”). Blue Diamond argues that application of the Coal Industry Retiree Health Benefit Act

OPINION OF THE COURT Rivera, J. Defendant challenges a determination of civil contempt for his failure to comply with a January 2010 order issued in the course of the parties’ matrimonial proceeding. That order requires him to deposit in escrow the proceeds of the sale of properties which are the subject of a prior equitable distribution determination in favor of plaintiff. We conclude tha