Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Donald W. Brown”
Commonwealth v. Brownpublic domain
ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 2nd day of August, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.
Commonwealth v. Brownpublic domain
ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 2nd day of August, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.
Commonwealth v. Brownpublic domain
ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 2nd day of August, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.
Donald Ray Brown v. Statepublic domain
OPINION ■ Opinion by Justice Carter . A jury convicted Donald Ray Brown of two .counts of aggravated sexual assault of a child under six years, of age. 1 Brown was sentenced to life imprisonment on each count, with • the sentences running consecutively, and was ordered to pay two $10,000,00 fine
Donald Vance v. Donald Rumsfeldpublic domain
WOOD, Circuit Judge, concurring in the judgment. Civilized societies do not condone torture committed by governmental agents, no matter what job title the agent holds. I am confident that every member of this court would agree with that proposition. This is therefore a case of system failure: plaintiffs Donald Vance and Nathan Ertel assert that representatives of the U.S. government (who happened to be mem
Brown v. Statepublic domain
KENNETH S. HIXSON, Judge Appellant Donald Lee Brown was convicted in a jury trial of second-degree murder committed against Damon Wilkins. *313Brown's sentence was enhanced pursuant to the jury's findings that he employed a firearm to commit the offense and that he committed the offense in the presence of a child. Brown's total
In re: Donald Trumppublic domain
NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge: *362 The District of Columbia and the State of Maryland commenced this action against Donald J. Trump in his official *363 capacity as President of the United State
Brown v. Colvinpublic domain
ORDER CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER, United States District Judge Upon careful consideration of the record in this case and the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation filed September 29, 2016, and hearing no objections from the Defendant, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and ACCEPTS the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that [9] Plaintiffs Motion
Blixseth v. Brownpublic domain
470 B.R. 562 (2012) Timothy L. BLIXSETH, Plaintiff, v. Stephen BROWN, an individual; Garlington, Lohn & Robinson, PLLP, a Montana professional limited liability partnership; James A. Patten, an individual; Patten Peterman Bekkedahl & Green, PLLC, a Montana professional limited liability company; J. Thomas Beckett, an individual; Parsons Behle & Latimer, a Utah professional corporation; Thomas L. Hutchinson, an individual; Bullivant, H
Brown v. Griffinpublic domain
OPINION NICKELL, JUDGE: Ashley Brown has appealed from the May 12, 2014, order of the Daviess Circuit Court granting summary judgment in favor of Eric P. Griffin, M.D., and The Women’s Pavilion, P.S.C.,1 on her claim for damages resulting from medical malpractice. Following a careful review of the briefs, the record and the law, we affirm. On December 28, 2
Michael G. Brown, M.D. v. the Texas State Board of Medical Examiners and Donald W. Patrick, M.D., J.D.public domain
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-08-00069-CV Michael G. Brown, M.D., Appellant v. The Texas State Board of Medical Examiners and Donald W. Patrick, M.D., J.D., Appellees FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 345TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-GN-06-001482, HONORABLE STEPHEN YELENOSKY, J
Michael G. Brown, M.D. v. the Texas State Board of Medical Examiners and Donald W. Patrick, M.D., J.D.public domain
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-08-00069-CV Michael G. Brown, M.D., Appellant v. The Texas State
Michael G. Brown, M.D. v. the Texas State Board of Medical Examiners and Donald W. Patrick, M.D., J.D.public domain
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-08-00069-CV Michael G. Brown, M.D., Appellant v.
CADY, Chief Justice. This case is before us on review from a report and recommendation of a division of the Iowa Supreme Court Grievance Commission concerning attorney Donald Capotosto. The report found Capotosto committed ethical violations and recommended he be suspended from the practice of law for sixty days. We find Capotosto violated the Iowa Rules of Professional Conduct by negle
Michael G. Brown, M.D. v. the Texas State Board of Medical Examiners and Donald W. Patrick, M.D., J.D.public domain
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-08-00069-CV Michael G. Brown, M.D., Appellant v. The Texas State Board of Medical Examiners and Donald W. Patrick, M.D., J.D., Appellees FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 345TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-GN-06-001482, HONORABLE STEPHEN YELENOSKY, JUDGE PRE
Alexandra Burns v. Michael Donald Burnspublic domain
OPINION JANE BLAND, Justice. Alexandra Burns appeals the trial court’s order denying her petition to terminate the parental rights of Michael Burns, her ex-husband and the father of their child, M.A. On appeal, she contends that the trial court erred in refusing to terminate Michael’s parental rights. Because the trial court reasonably could have conclud
State v. Brownpublic domain
LISA WHITE HARDWICK, Judge. The State of Missouri appeals the circuit court’s dismissal of a felony charge against Donald Brown for second-degree domestic assault. The State contends the court erred in dismissing the charge under the Uniform Mandatory Disposition of Detain-ers Law (UMDDL), Section 217.450 et seq., RSMo,1 because it did not apply the current version of the statute. For reasons expla
Brown-Thill v. Brown-Thillpublic domain
(Emphasis added.) The court did not find evidence of "gross negligence or willful malfeasance," and Brown fails to show that the court erred in that determination. *633As the court explained, "consolidated financials were offered into evidence," and "[b]oth Trustees were subject to cross-examination, [which] afforded those interested in the Trusts an o
Welch v. Brownpublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
State of Hawaii v. Donald Trumppublic domain
OPINION 1 PER CURIAM: We are asked to delineate the statutory and constitutional limits to the President’s power to control immigration in this appeal of the district court’s order preliminarily enjoining two sections of Executive Order 13780 (“E02” or “the Order”), “Protecting the Nation From Fore