⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

4 opinions for “Donald W Cundiff and Angela K Cundiff”

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016-07-29 · Published · cited 6× · 830 F.3d 1306; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 13810; 2016 WL 4056030
HULL, Circuit Judge: In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, Defendant Tyrus McDowell appeals the district court’s interlocutory order denying his motion for summary judgment based on qualified immunity. The district court found that Assistant Principal McDowell’s strip search of a minor student violated clearly established constitutional law. After careful review of the record and b
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992-02-10 · Published · cited 7× · 414 S.E.2d 795; 307 S.C. 299
307 S.C. 299 (1992) 414 S.E.2d 795 SHIPYARD PROPERTY OWNERS' ASSOCIATION, Appellant-Respondent v. Stephen MANGIARACINA, William F. Llewellyn, Duncan A. MacLeod, MARILYN A. MacLeod, Justus A. Emens, Lee L. Lachiver, William Ohlson, Henry H. Johnson, Ronald Seamon, Nancy Seamon, Richard C. Chase, Frank Bocuzzi, Mary Bocuzzi, David O. Hoagland, Confidential Escrow & Title, a South Carolina Corporation, Fred Dickerman, Ing
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018-09-13 · Published · cited 313× · 903 F.3d 1090
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL CAMPBELL; et al, * No. 15-56990 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. 2:04-cv-08592- AG-AJW CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-Appellee. CESAR MATA,
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992-02-10 · Published · cited 0× · 307 S.C. 299; 414 S.E.2d 795; 1992 S.C. App. LEXIS 26
Cureton, Judge: In this declaratory judgment action, Shipyard Property Owners’ Association (Shipyard) seeks a judicial declaration granting it authority to alter the assessment provisions in the covenants and restrictions for certain property owners in Shipyard Plantation, a planned unit development (PUD). The master concluded Shipyard could not alter the assessment provisions and Shipyard appeals. We affirm.