Cases

438 F.Supp. 358 (1977) Porter DEPEW et ux., etc., Plaintiffs, v. The HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. Porter DEPEW et ux., etc., Plaintiffs, v. INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, Defendant. Porter DEPEW et ux., etc., Plaintiffs, v. The CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. Nos. CIV-2-75-131 to CIV-2-75-133. United States District Court, E. D. Tennessee, Northeastern Di

MEMORANDUM OPINION NEESE, District Judge. These are civil actions. During the trial, the plaintiff Mr. Porter Depew declined to answer certain questions asked him on cross-examination concerning his federal income tax returns on the ground that his answers might tend to incriminate him in some future criminal prosecution, claiming his privilege against self-incrimination under the Constitution, Fifth Amendmen

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER NEESE, District Judge. The defendant The Hanover Insurance Company moved for a summary judgment, Rule 56(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, contending that the plaintiffs were required to furnish notice and a proof of loss, as required by the insurance contract of such parties, as a condition precedent to any recovery against it herein. The motion lacks merit.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER NEESE, District Judge. The plaintiffs moved the Court to shorten to 15 days the time in which the respective defendants are required to respond to certain requests for admissions recently served on them by the plaintiffs.* Rule 36(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; United States v. A. B. Dick Co., D.C. Ohio (1947), 7 F.R.D. 442, 443[3] (relat

PER CURIAM: First National Bank of Oneida, N.A. ("First National") brought this action against Donald Brandt to collect the remaining amounts due on several loans after the real estate securing those loans was sold and the proceeds of those sales did not cover the outstanding balances. Brandt, who had earlier filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition, moved to dismiss First National's clai

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Fboessel, Van Vooehis, Btjbke and Fosteb.

Per Curiam. Defendant-appellant Continental Casualty Co., hereinafter called “ Surety”, wrote performance and payment bonds protecting Depew Paving Company, Inc., hereinafter called ‘ ‘ General Contractor ’ ’, against default on the part of the Newjer Contracting Company, Inc., hereinafter called “ Subcontractor ”. The obligation under the bonds covered the work to be done by the Subcontractor under two road-building c

OPINION Justice ROBINSON, for the Court. The plaintiff, Donald Panarello, appeals from a judgment entered on November 26, 2010 after a lengthy jury-waived trial in the Superior Court. In the detailed deci *353 sion that underlies that judgment, the trial justice ruled that t

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBERT E. NUGENT, Chief Judge. Congress and the Kansas Legislature have each enacted an earned income tax credit (EIC) to afford lower-income families with children not only a refund of over-withheld wages, but also an additional refundable tax credit.1 Until last year, the right to receive the credit, along with the debtor’s income tax refund, was s

The opinion of the court was delivered by Hutchison, J.: We have here two cases involving the same subject matter that by stipulation are to be considered together. One comes to this court by appeal, and the other is an action in quo warranto brought originally in this court on the relation of the attorney general of the state. The first case is an injunction action commenced in the district

ELIZABETH A. KOVACHEVICH, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS CAUSE comes before the Court for consideration on remand by the Eleventh Circuit. (Dkt. 69). Petitioner, First National Bank of Onieda, N.A. ("FNBO "), originally brought this action against Defendant, Donald Brandt ("Brandt "), to collect the remaining amounts due on several loans after the real estate securing those loans

277 Kan. 536 (2004) 86 P.3d 1012 KIMBERLYN D. HOLT, a minor, by and through KIMBERLY R. HOLT and KENNETH F. HOLT, Her Parents, Natural Guardians, and Next Friends, and KIMBERLY R. HOLT and KENNETH F. HOLT, Individually, Plaintiffs, v. WESLEY MEDICAL CENTER, LLC, a Kansas Corporation, D/B/A WESLEY MEDICAL CENTER; WICHITA CENTER FOR GRADUATE MEDICAL EDUCATION, INC., a Kansas Corporation; BENJAMIN J. HARRIS, M.D.; CLIFFORD S.

989 F.2d 1390 Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,402, 38 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 462UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.UNITED MEDICAL AND SURGICAL SUPPLY CORPORATION; C. DonaldStone, Defendants-Appellants.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Robert Morris BUCHANAN, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.C. Donald STONE, Defendant-Appellant. No

Thomas TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-95-00455-CV Donald Scott Thomas and Jane Holt Thomas, Appellants

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 16a0289p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ QUISI BRYAN, ┐ Petitioner-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, │

18 Kan. App. 2d 782 (1993) 859 P.2d 410 FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., Appellant, v. ROBERT LAUDICK, DONALD E. POWERS, PAULA JEAN POWERS, HENRY J. CALNAN, ARDIS B. CALNAN, MILTON A. ROSE, JOYCE A. ROSE, JAMES N. SWAFFORD, and WILMA L. SWAFFORD, Appellees. No. 68,990 Court of Appeals of Kansas. Opinion filed September 17, 1993.

264 P.3d 989 (2011) 293 Kan. 332 Roger ZIMMERMAN, et al., Appellants/Cross-appellees, and A.B. HUDSON and Larry French, Intervenors/Appellants/Cross-appellees, v. Board of County Commissioners of Wabaunsee County, Kansas, Appellees/Cross-appellants. No. 98,487. Supreme Court of Kansas. October 21, 2011. *993<

751 N.W.2d 520 (2008) William E. KASBEN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Beryl W. HOFFMAN, Defendant, and Gary R. Bergstrom, PLC, Appellant. Docket No. 272999. Court of Appeals of Michigan. Submitted March 4, 2008, at Grand Rapids. Decided April 1, 2008, at 9:15 a.m. *521 Donald W. Garthe, Grandville, for William E. K

990 F.2d 780 Monmohan BHATLA; Shabnam Bhatla; Larry Ayrers; AnthonyRead; John E. Barden; Elizabeth Ann Barden; JamesSourwine; Annette Sourwine; Frank Binder; Edward Collier;Jeanne Collier; Joseph Curcio; Mary Curcio; John A.Maxin; Patricia Maxin; Frances Maxin; Judith Maxin;Samuel H. Depew, Marilyn Depew (d/b/a Depew InvestmentGroup); Glenn Dolfi; Martha F. Dolfi; John Driscoll andEileen M. Driscoll; R

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Kathryn H. Vratil, United States District Judge Mary McDonald brings employment claims against the City of Wichita, Kansas and Gary Rebenstorf. Specifically, plaintiff alleges that Rebenstorf deprived her of First Amendment right to free speech and free association and denied her equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment in violation of 42 U.S.C.§ 1983. Plaintiff claims that t