Cases

WINOKUR, J. Finding that the amount awarded by the jury in this personal injury action was inadequate, the court below granted appel-lees’ motion for additur. Upon appellant’s refusal to agree to the additur, the court ordered a new trial on the issue of disputed damages only, as required by statute. Appellant argues that the jury’s award was supported by the evidence and that t

OPINION 1 PER CURIAM: We are asked to delineate the statutory and constitutional limits to the President’s power to control immigration in this appeal of the district court’s order preliminarily enjoining two sections of Executive Order 13780 (“E02” or “the Order”), “Protecting the Nation From Fore

JOHN R. BROWN, Senior Circuit Judge: Louis Donald Lamberti was paroled from sentence on an earlier offense on June 9, 1980. His parole officer’s attempts to verify the employment information Lamberti submitted to him revealed that Lamberti was not regularly employed and had not earned the amounts he claimed. Lamber-ti’s parole was revoked, and information on his employment and

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 14a0094p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ CITY OF PONTIAC RETIRED EMPLOYEES ┐ ASSOCIATION; DELMER ANDERSON; THOMAS │ HUNTER; HENRY C. SHOEMAKER; YVETTE TALLEY;

ORDER PER CURIAM. Plaintiffs, certain condominium owners in the Westmoor Place Condominium development, brought action against the defendants complaining about the management of the condominium and the conduct of elections for the Board of Managers. In their petition, Plaintiffs alleged breach of fiduciary duty, self-dealing, conflict of interest, and fraud. Plaintiffs also sought to pierce the con

BEAM, Circuit Judge. Firefighters’ Instit he for Racial Equality 2 and twenty-two individual plaintiffs (collectively FIRE) brought suit against the City of St. Louis (the City) and the St. Louis Firefighters Association Local 73 (Local 73) 3 for violations of

[1] Melba Anderson (plaintiff) appeals a judgment quieting title to certain real estate in Crawford County, Missouri, to which she claimed title by adverse possession. The judgment declares the owners of the disputed tract of land to be Susie Howald, J. Kent Howald and Elizabeth Howald (defendants). This court affirms. [2] Defendants hold record title to the disputed tract, a triangular parcel of land containing approximately 800 square feet. It provides an access route to othe

897 S.W.2d 176 (1995) Melba ANDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Arthur HOWALD and Susie Howald, his wife, and J. Kent Howald and Elizabeth Howald, his wife, Defendants-Respondents. Melba ANDERSON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Arthur HOWALD and Susie Howald, his wife, and J. Kent Howald and Elizabeth Howald, his wife, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 19466, 19484. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern Distri

ORDER PER CURIAM. John Anderson (Plaintiff) appeals from the judgment sustaining the motion to dismiss his election contest petition against Vicki Lynn Auping (Defendant). Plaintiff was the loser in a three-way election contest for two vacant seats on the Board of Trustees of the Village of New Melle; Defendant was one of the two successful candidates in that race. The sole question presented here

ORDER PER CURIAM. Appellant, Robert H. Grant, appeals from a trial court order granting summary judgment in favor of respondent, St. Louis County, Missouri, on appellant’s claim for payment of one-half of his accumulated sick leave, which appellant alleges was owing upon his exit from employment with respondent. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the l

INMAN, Judge. *196Plaintiffs are 262 property owners in SeaScape at Holden Plantation ("SeaScape"), a residential subdivision near Holden Beach, North Carolina. They appeal from the trial court's orders: (1) dismissing plaintiffs' derivative claims brought on behalf of SeaScape at Holden Plantation Property Owners Association, Inc. ("the POA"

PUDLOWSKI, Presiding Judge. This is an appeal from an order quashing the execution and garnishment for unpaid child support and from an order modifying husband’s obligation to pay child support. We affirm. On September 14, 1979, the marriage of appellant, Shirley Jean Anderson and re*943spondent, Donald Charles Anderson, was dissolved. Care and cus

STROUD, Judge. The SeaScape at Holden Plantation Property Owners Association, Inc. appeals from an order entered 24 January 2013 denying its motion to intervene. We reverse and remand. *5I. Background This action concerns a planned community in Brunswick County called SeaScape at Holden Plantation (“SeaScape Community”). The SeaScape Co

801 F.2d 936 LaDonna ANDERSON as Executor of the Estate of DonaldAnderson, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.MARATHON PETROLEUM COMPANY, f/k/a Marathon Oil Company,Defendant-Appellee. No. 85-3016. United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Circuit. Argued May 29, 1986.Decided Sept. 16, 1986. Robert Brown, Ronald T

WOOD, Circuit Judge, concurring in the judgment. Civilized societies do not condone torture committed by governmental agents, no matter what job title the agent holds. I am confident that every member of this court would agree with that proposition. This is therefore a case of system failure: plaintiffs Donald Vance and Nathan Ertel assert that representatives of the U.S. government (who happened to be mem

ORDER PER CURIAM. This is an appeal from a judgment entered on a jury verdict for defendant in a malpractice case. The evidence in support of the jury verdict is not insufficient and no error of law appears. *254An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value.

WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. Donald E. Reese, a Missouri inmate sentenced to death, appeals the district court’s 1 denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. We affirm. I. Background On March 25,1988, Reese was convicted of two count

Michael J. Kelly, J. (dissenting). I find this case indistinguishable from People v Schultz, 172 Mich App 674; 432 NW2d 742 (1988), lv gtd 432 Mich 891 (1989). The majority says that the sentencing judge stated her belief that the mandatory sen*785tence was "an appropriate sentence in this individual case.” I don’t see i

ORDER PER CURIAM. Direct appeal from the denial of post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 27.26. Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

BENTON, Circuit Judge. Donald Morgan sued his boss Michael Robinson for First Amendment retaliation under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . Robinson moved for summary judgment based on qualified immunity. The district court denied the motion. This court reverses and reman