Cases

Judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Delin, J.), rendered August 22, 1980, affirmed. No opinion. This case is remitted to the County Court, Nassau County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). Gibbons, J. P., Gulotta, Cohalan and Bracken, JJ., concur.

SHINER, COMMONWEALTH vs., 101 Mass. App. Ct. 206 COMMONWEALTH vs. DOMINIC SHINER. 101 Mass. App. Ct. 206 September 8, 2021 - June 15, 2022 Court Below: Superior Court, Suffolk County Present: Rubin, Milkey, & Henry, JJ. No. 19-P-758. Homicide. Intimidation of Witness. Evidence, Experiment, Demonstration,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2023-CA-00285-SCT ST. DOMINIC-JACKSON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL v. MERILYN J. MARTIN DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/01/2022 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. ADRIENNE ANNETT HOOPER- WOOTEN TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: YANCY B. BURNS MARCUS AMIR WILLIAMS

[Cite as Caruso v. Leneghan, 2014-Ohio-1824.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 99582 ANGELA CARUSO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE/ CROSS-APPELLANT

Matter of Caruso - 2026 NY Slip Op 03355 skip to main content It appears you are using Adblock. Please disable Adblock to best experience our website. Law Reporting Bureau Thomas J.K. Smith, State Reporter

Arbona Lago, Juez Ponente TEXTO COMPLETO DE LA SENTENCIA Antecedentes A Ante el Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Sala Superior de Bayamón (TPI) y en la causa DAC1999-1252, se tramitó en conjunto la división de herencia de los hermanos María Josefa, María de las Mercedes y José Antonio González Rodríguez, a las que concurren 42 coherederos. El pleit

560 F.Supp.2d 153 (2008) Michael SPENCER, Plaintiff, v. State of CONNECTICUT, City of Stamford, Stamford Police Department, Thomas Snyder, Frederick Caruso, Eugene Dohmann, Larry Eisenstein, Douglas Robinson, and Wayne Scutari, Defendants. No. 3.06CV01209 (DJS). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. June 18, 2008. *155 Pa

994 F.Supp. 1454 (1998) MICHAEL CARUSO & CO, INC., Plaintiff, v. ESTEFAN ENTERPRISES, INC. and Bongos Cuban Cafe, Inc., Defendants. No. 97-2993-CIV-KING. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. February 12, 1998. *1455 *1456 Wilfredo A. Rodriguez, Holland & Knight, Miami, FL, Lesli

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 15 OPINION Effective January 1, 1983, the Legislature substantially revised the statutory scheme for sentence reductions (see Stats. 1982, ch. 1234) amending Penal Code sections 2930, 2931, 2932 and 4019, and adding sections 2933, 2934, and 2935.2

779 F.Supp. 332 (1991) Conrad S. CARUSO, Plaintiff, v. PEAT, MARWICK, MITCHELL & CO., Defendant. 86 Civ. 3408 (RPP). United States District Court, S.D. New York. December 6, 1991. *333 Vladeck, Waldman, Elias & Engelhard, P.C. by Joseph J. Garcia, Laura S. Schnell, New York City, for plaintiff. Cahill Gordon &

SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Supreme Court. Please note that, in the interest of brevity, portions of any opinion may not have been summarized.) John Giovanni Granata v. Edward F. Broderick, Jr. (A-31/32-16) (078207) (NOTE: The Court did not write a plenary

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County, rendered September 28, 1973, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of robbery in the second degree. The issues raised on this appeal are whether defendant knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived his right to counsel and privilege against self incrimination prior to making a confession; whether his confession was the product of coercion resulting from a police-dominated atmosphere dur

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

OPINION and ORDER ROBERT P. PATTERSON, JR., District Judge. This is a motion by plaintiff to vacate its default for failure to defend on defendants’ counterclaims and failure to prosecute its complaint. BACKGROUND In March 1990, the parties submitted a joint pretrial order. On April 6,1990, counsel for both parties appeared at a pretrial conference, where the Court in

REDMANN, Chief Judge. Appealing only the amount of a $17,600 jury award for “loss of wages or impairment of earning capacity,” defendant argues that there is no medical evidence to support an award other than for about three weeks of disability because of a nose operation three months after the accident. (Plaintiff did not miss any work immediately following the accident.) Treating general surgeon Dr. Cla

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Cruger v. Love, 599 So.2d 111 (Fla.1992); Holly v. Auld, 450 So.2d 217 (Fla.1984). GRIFFIN, C.J., COBB and PETERSON, JJ., concur.

*1437 Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Caruso, J.) entered January 15, 2015 in Schenectady County, which dismissed petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, without a hearing. Petitioner commenced this habeas corpus proceeding claiming to be il

Rockefeller v Leon (2024 NY Slip Op 06370) Rockefeller v Leon 2024 NY Slip Op 06370 Decided on December 18, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. </

ELY, Circuit Judge: U.S.A. Motel Corporation (hereinafter USA) petitioned for reorganization under Chapter X of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C. §§ 501-676. USA’s petition was approved, a trustee and a special master were appointed, and a hearing date was set. 11 U.S.C. §§ 517, 541, 556, 561. Two stockholders of USA, Henry Caruso and Caruso Enterprises, Incorporated (hereinafter CEI), filed two pleadings controverting the alleg

Friscia v Village of Geneseo (2021 NY Slip Op 04793) Friscia v Village of Geneseo 2021 NY Slip Op 04793 Decided on August 26, 2021 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau p