Cases

DAVIS, J. This appeal from a declaratory judgment presents the question of whether a commercial real estate appraisal was rendered in compliance with the dictates of the option agreement to purchase the subject property. VEI Catonsville, LLC (VEI) seeks our review of a declaration rendered by the Circuit Court for Baltimore County that an appraisal of the property at issue complied with the dictates of the “Agreement Regarding

Filed 4/27/16 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO FRIENDS OF MARTIN’S BEACH, Plaintiff and Appellant, A142035 v. MARTIN’S BEACH 1 LLC et al., (San Mateo County Super. Ct.

STEWART, J. At issue in this case is a dispute between the public and property owners over the use of a road, parking area and the inland dry sand of a popular beach. There is no disagreement about defendants' ownership of these areas or the property of which they are a part. Rather, the public rights claimed by plaintiff are predicated on two theories. The first is that a provision of the California Constitution confers on the pu

679 F.Supp. 1204 (1987) Mattiebelle HARRIS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. John O. MARSH, Jr., Defendant. Leonza LOFTIN, Plaintiff, v. John O. MARSH, Jr., Defendant. Nos. 81-60-CIV-3, 80-168-CIV-3. United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Fayetteville Division. December 28, 1987. *1205

17 Cal.3d 129 (1976) 550 P.2d 1001 130 Cal. Rptr. 465 TRUDE BIRKENFELD et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. CITY OF BERKELEY, Defendant and Appellant; FAIR RENT COMMITTEE et al., Interveners and Appellants. Docket No. S.F. 23370. Supreme Court of California. June 16, 1976. *135 CO