Cases

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: DEFENDANT PATRICK DONA-HOE’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOCKET ENTRY #25) BOWLER, United States Magistrate Judge. Pending before this court is a motion for summary judgment filed by defendant Patrick Donahoe, Postmaster General of the United States Postal Service (“defendant”). (Docket Entry #25). Plaintiff Edward Thomas Doherty (“plaintiff’), proceeding pro se, opposes summary ju

OPINION OF THE COURT GIBBONS, Chief Judge: Gary Golden is a federal prisoner serving a twenty-nine year sentence. The judgment of sentence was affirmed by this court, and certiorari was denied on November 13, 1984. A motion for reduction of sentence was filed on his behalf by assigned trial counsel on June 13, 1985. Because it was filed more than 120 days after the

Opinion by Judge Palladino, In this appeal the Borough of Baldwin (Borough) seeks review of the decision of the Civil Service Commission (Commission) of the Borough of Baldwin with regard to the sanction imposed upon Clarence Schmidt (cross-appellee). More specifically, the Borough would have this Court vacate the one year suspension ordered by the Commission and mandate the permanent dismissal of the cross-ap

2024 IL App (4th) 221109 FILED NO. 4-22-1109 February 26, 2024 Carla Bender th IN THE APPELLATE COURT 4 Distric

OPINION OF THE COURT A. LEON HIGGINBOTHAM, Jr., Circuit Judge. This is an appeal from the final judgment of conviction and sentence imposed upon Appellant, Charles J. Burks, M.D., pursuant to a jury verdict of guilt of mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (1982). The Appellant contends that his conviction cannot stand because there was insufficient evidence o

OPINION OF THE COURT GREENBERG, Circuit Judge. On June 22, 1989, appellants Benjamin Woods, Michael Hartman, and Ablebuilt Construction Co., were charged in a twenty-nine count indictment which included a RICO count under 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c), the City Council of Pittsburgh being the RICO enterprise, numerous Hobbs Act counts and tax counts, arising from public corruption in the Pittsburgh area.

BECKER, Circuit Judge, concurring. I concur in the judgment and join in the majority opinion except for its discussion of the sufficiency of the evidence against Hauser and Cotton on the conspiracy charge and its discussion of imposition of a mandatory life sentence on McGIory. Unlike the majority, I would not place reliance in assessing the sufficiency of the evidence to support Hauser and Cotton’s convic

JUAN M. PEREZ-GIMENEZ, SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiffs Danny Dominguez and Elionai Fernandez sued Defendants Minerva Ramos ("ADA Ramos") and Dennis Morales Rodriguez ("Officer Morales") (collectively, "Defendants") for alleged violations of their rights under the Fourth Amendment.1 Docket No. 1. They specifically

*31JUSTICE LaVECCHIA concurring. I concur in the majority opinion remanding this disability discrimination matter for trial. I agree that plaintiff has met her pretrial obligation to present a prima facie case of unlawful discrimination under our Law Against Discrimination (LAD), N.J.S.A. 10:5-1 to -42, entitling her to a determination by a jury

ENTRY ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS RICHARD L. YOUNG, Chief Judge. Plaintiffs, Little Arm Inc. d/b/a B & B Distributions (“Little Arm”), Bohemian Groove LLC (“Bohemian”), MELX2 Enterprises Inc. (“MELX2”), and IDK Anything LLC (“IDK”), bring this action against all Prosecuting Attorneys in Indiana (“Defendants”) seeking injunctive and declaratory relief as to Indiana Code

915 F.2d 854 UNITED STATESv.Benjamin H. WOODS, Appellant in No. 90-3044,Michael A. Hartman, Appellant in No. 90-3045,Ablebuilt Construction Company, Inc., a/k/a Ablebuilt Homes,Inc., Appellant in No. 90-3046. Nos. 90-3044, 90-3045 and 90-3046. United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Argued Aug. 13, 1990.Decided Oct. 1, 1990.

341 Mass. 640 (1961) 171 N.E.2d 287 JAMES P. KANE vs. FIELDS CORNER GRILLE, INC. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Suffolk. November 7, 1960. January 9, 1961. Present: WILKINS, C.J., SPALDING, WILLIAMS, WHITTEMORE, & CUTTER, JJ. Thomas D. O'Brien III, for the defendant. Francis J. DiMento, for the plaint

968 F.2d 309 35 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1124 UNITED STATES of Americav.Reginald D. McGLORY, Melvin Hauser, Norman Gomez, a/k/aChubbs, Roland Slade, Norma Jean Pruitt, ViraKulkivit, a/k/a Wee, Yongyos Thauthong,Willie J. Purdom and Charles Cotton.Vira Kulkovit, Appellant.UNITED STATES of Americav.Reginald D. McGLORY, Melvin Hauser, Norman Gomez, a/k/aChubbs, Roland Slade, Norma Jean Pr

The foregoing opinion by DAVIS, C., is adopted as the opinion of the court. All of the judges concur. ON MOTION FOR REHEARING. In his motion for a rehearing, defendant challenges the finding of a record entry that shows that the bill of exceptions was duly filed. The abstract of the record shows this entry: "Thereafter, on the 23rd day of April, 1927, and within the timeObjections allowed by the court and by law, plaintiff duly

Loring, J. In the first of these cases the defendant is complained of for a violation of Pub. Sts. c. 68, § 16, in selling ice in a street in Boston without license from the Secretary of the Commonwealth. The motion to quash was rightly overruled. It is too late to object in the Superior Court that a complaint originally filed in an inferior court is insufficient in form. Pub. Sts. c. 214, § 25. Commonwea

Statutory will contest. The question below was whether one Jacob Lampert, the testator, was *Page 520 fraudulently misled or wrongfully influenced in the execution of his alleged will. The contestants were nieces and nephews of the testator. The proponents of the alleged will, all named as defendants, were a sister and her husband, other relatives, friends and sundry charitable institutions. Rosa Graff, the sister, was the chief beneficiary.